Consilium Principis
MCPB · CONSILIUM-PRINCIPIS.MCPB · SCANNED SEP 20
AI advisory board (MCP): quotes verified word-for-word against public-domain texts, fail-closed
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security13
- Malware scan not yet available for this package.Unverified
- Known CVEs could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM, so there is no dependency list to read. Publishing one would let us assess it.Unverified
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- Dependency health could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM, so there is no dependency list to read. Publishing one would let us assess it.Unverified
Provenance & Transparency48
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 57 days ago).Pass
- Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability61
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 10287 tokens (~168/item across 61 items; 61 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management93
- Stability observed for 28 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage68
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 5% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 61 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 62 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities20
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2024-11-05; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Add this component to your MCP client. Where a client-specific snippet is available, pick your client below and copy it straight into your config; otherwise use the connection detail shown.
mcpb · consilium-principis.mcpb
Download bundleEvery change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 20 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 16 Sept 26 −3
- Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
- 15 Sept 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 13 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 11 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 10 Sept 26 −3
- Stability: pass → 0.83 functional
- 9 Sept 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Analysed mcpb/https://github.com/ilyautov/consilium-principis/releases/download/v0.1.3/consilium-principis.mcpb
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | mcpb |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
run_calculation ~181
Детерминированный Монте-Карло по ВАЛИДНОЙ карте решения (ноль LLM в счёте: считает код, сид фиксирован, тот же сид → тот же результат). Невалидная карта → отказ с errors (fail-closed, доноси их вопросами совета). Возвращает на вариант mean/median/p10/p90, P(лучший), expected_regret, торнадо, top_uncertainties + label_text — готовую «📐 рамку»: показывай расчёт ТОЛЬКО с ней, лейбл «📐» — рядом с 🔵/🟢/🟡, НИКОГДА не смешивая.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| map | object | yes | – |
| n | integer | – | – |
| seed | integer | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
save_decision_card ~320
Записать Decision Card артефактом decisions/<дата>-<slug>.card.json — момент РЕШЕНИЯ (я выбрал вариант X): UUID (dc_…), prediction contract (числа из mc_run хранятся ЧИСЛАМИ: event probability ИЛИ metric p10/p50/p90+единицы), допущения, критерий успеха, дата ревью. МУТИРУЮЩИЙ тул: зови ТОЛЬКО с согласия юзера (Rule 0), ОДИН РАЗ после того как юзер выбрал вариант. chosen_option — id из map.options или null (defer). Нужна дата возврата: review_date или review_horizon_days. Возвращает card_id + journal_line с якорем. Закрытие исхода — close_decision_card, точность — prediction_calibration.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| assumptions | array | – | – |
| chosen_option | string|null | yes | – |
| form | string | – | – |
| map | object | yes | – |
| map_path | string | – | – |
| n | integer | – | – |
| owner | string | – | – |
| reversibility | string | – | – |
| review_date | string | – | – |
| review_horizon_days | integer | – | – |
| seed | integer | – | – |
| session_id | string | – | – |
| situation_ref | string | – | – |
| slug | string | – | – |
| statement | string | – | – |
| success_criterion | object | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
save_decision_map ~167
Сохранить карту решения артефактом decisions/<дата>-<slug>.json в корне доски (внутри — карта + МК-сводка с predicted). МУТИРУЮЩИЙ тул: зови ТОЛЬКО с явного согласия юзера (правило 0) — предложи ОДИН РАЗ после расчёта. Возвращает path + journal_line («Прогноз: 📐 …») — готовую строку прогноза для записи в журнал решений (§4.3). slug — латиница/цифры/дефисы.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| map | object | yes | – |
| n | integer | – | – |
| seed | integer | – | – |
| slug | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
scaffold_principis ~60
Собрать principis.md из ответов юзера (who/vector/interface_mode/temperament/not_known). Вектор не дан → пробел держим живым. Возвращает markdown — запиши его.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| answers | object | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
seed_council ~87
Собрать стартовый совет PD-мудрецов (Аврелий+Эпиктет) с нуля — холодный старт без шелла. ФОНОВЫЙ ДЖОБ (долго + сеть Gutenberg): вернёт {job_id} сразу, опрашивай job_status. Идемпотентно по уже собранным.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
setup_full ~81
Поднять FULL-тир (семантика) ИЗ АГЕНТА: системный ollama НЕ ставим молча (вернём инструкцию под ОС), модель bge-m3 — авто-pull при consent. Возвращает шаги + финальный статус. consent=false → только план, без выполнения.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| consent | boolean | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
situation_analyze ~100
Ситуационная карта: оценить дерево ходов (ты+оппонент). Возвращает оценку, главную линию, ЧЕСТНЫЙ вердикт. opponent∈{self,person,world}, stance∈{competitive,cooperative}. Фабрикацией (grounded:false) не выигрывают.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| opponent | string | – | – |
| stance | string | – | – |
| tree | object | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
situation_stress_test ~82
Adversarial-стресс-тест карты: держится ли линия под возмущениями мира (invalidate/weaken/inject_counter). Даёт robustness и fragile_under. Возмущает мир/позицию, НЕ уста советников.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| perturbations | array | yes | – |
| stance | string | – | – |
| tree | object | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
stability ~55
Доверие через стабильность: вердикты N прогонов → robust/leaning/coin-flip. Отличает устойчивый вывод от монетки в обёртке мудрости.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| verdicts | array | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
validate_decision_map ~134
Гейты честности карты решения («Principis-расчёт», fail-closed): каждая величина подтверждена юзером (confirmed_by_user), тройки min<=mode<=max / prob в [0,1], статус-кво вариант есть, формулы парсятся, у каждой — словесная версия. → {valid, errors[]}. Ошибки доноси до юзера ВОПРОСАМИ совета, не техдампом. Зови после допроса карты, ПЕРЕД run_calculation.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| map | object | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
validate_manifest ~86
МОАТ-гейт сборки: проверить тир-манифест советника — region-маркеры реально есть в источнике (иначе тиры съедут, 🔵 не на тех словах), тиры валидны, файлы на месте. Зови ПЕРЕД build-advisor. advisor_dir = advisors/{имя}.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| advisor_dir | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the Consilium Principis MCP server?
Consilium Principis is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.ilyautov/consilium-principis. AI advisory board (MCP): quotes verified word-for-word against public-domain texts, fail-closed. This page covers its MCPB bundle (https://github.com/ilyautov/consilium-principis/releases/download/v0.1.3/consilium-principis.mcpb).
Is the Consilium Principis MCP server safe to use?
Consilium Principis scores 50 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Consilium Principis MCP server expose?
Consilium Principis exposes 61 tools: fidelity_check, add_source, catalog_list, catalog_search, catalog_preview, and 56 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 6,791 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
What licence is the Consilium Principis MCP server under?
Consilium Principis declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.