Aviation Accident Analysis MCP
PYPI · AVIATION-ACCIDENT-ANALYSIS · SCANNED SEP 22
Aviation accident report parsing and prompt generation service under the SHELL framework.
Available components
Recent critical change
CVE-2026-78683 affects this package (9 Sept 2026). See the changelog before you install this server.
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security74
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- CVE check failed: an unpatched critical CVE affects this package; the score is capped at 0. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Runs hatchling.build at install time, a recognised native-build step with no shell scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
- Dependency health was assessed across the 163 of 165 dependencies we could resolve, so this covers what we could see, not the whole tree. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 56 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
- Schema quality not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no schema to assess.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no schema to compare.Unverified
Tool Coverage0
- Tool coverage not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no tool definitions to assess.Unverified
Tool Safety0
- Tool safety not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no tool text to scan.Unverified
Capabilities0
- Protocol version not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we never saw its MCP handshake.Unverified
Unverified: 5 categories
Categories scored 0 because our sandbox run of this package has not given us the schema these checks need to read. That is a gap on our side rather than a finding about the package, and we only credit what we can confirm, so the score stands at 0 until the capture succeeds. We are working through the fleet, so this normally clears without any action from you. How we score packages →
How do I install the Aviation Accident Analysis MCP server?
Aviation Accident Analysis MCP runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx aviation-accident-analysis. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
pypi · aviation-accident-analysis
claude mcp add hzy9981-aviation-accident-analysis -- uvx aviation-accident-analysis
{
"mcpServers": {
"hzy9981-aviation-accident-analysis": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"aviation-accident-analysis"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"hzy9981-aviation-accident-analysis": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"aviation-accident-analysis"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add hzy9981-aviation-accident-analysis -- uvx aviation-accident-analysis
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"hzy9981-aviation-accident-analysis": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"uvx",
"aviation-accident-analysis"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add hzy9981-aviation-accident-analysis --command uvx --arg aviation-accident-analysis
mcp_servers:
hzy9981-aviation-accident-analysis:
command: "uvx"
args: ["aviation-accident-analysis"] {
"McpServers": {
"hzy9981-aviation-accident-analysis": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "uvx",
"Arguments": [
"aviation-accident-analysis"
]
}
}
} assistant mcp add hzy9981-aviation-accident-analysis -t stdio -c uvx -a aviation-accident-analysis
{
"mcpServers": {
"hzy9981-aviation-accident-analysis": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"aviation-accident-analysis"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 9 Sept 26 0
- CVE-2026-78683 affects this package: high ▼ critical
- CVE-2026-79657 affects this package: high ▼ critical
- 2 Sept 26 −36
- CVE-2026-79675 affects this package: high ▼ critical
- Score status: scored → failed ▼ critical
- Known CVEs: CVE check failed: an unpatched critical CVE affects this package; the score is capped at 0. critical
- CVE-2026-62388 no longer affects this package ▲ security
- CVE-2026-63311 no longer affects this package ▲ security
- CVE-2026-12072 no longer affects this package ▲ security
- CVE-2026-12061 no longer affects this package ▲ security
- CVE-2026-54293 no longer affects this package ▲ security
- CVE-2026-12243 no longer affects this package ▲ security
- CVE-2026-12074 no longer affects this package ▲ security
- CVE-2026-12075 no longer affects this package ▲ security
- 29 Aug 26 0
- CVE-2026-62388 affects this package: high ▼ security
- CVE-2026-63311 affects this package: high ▼ security
- 27 Aug 26 0
- Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
- 26 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 23 Aug 26 0
- CVE-2026-12061 affects this package: high ▼ security
- CVE-2026-12072 affects this package: high ▼ security
- CVE-2026-54293 affects this package: high ▼ security
- CVE-2026-12074 affects this package: high ▼ security
- CVE-2026-12075 affects this package: high ▼ security
- CVE-2026-12243 affects this package: high ▼ security
- Known CVEs: partial → fail ▼ security
- 11 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 4 Aug 26 0
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Known CVEs: unverified → partial ▲ security
- Dependency health: unverified → partial ▲ functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 22 Sept 2026 · Analysed pypi/aviation-accident-analysis@0.1.0
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | pypi |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Install scripts 1 script
| Hook | Tier | Command |
|---|---|---|
| build_backend | allowlisted | hatchling.build |
Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →
Vulnerabilities 62 findings
| ID | CVE | Severity | Vector | Fix available |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHSA-8mgp-746c-j5xp | CVE-2026-81726 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L | no |
| GHSA-3gq4-3j92-5w49 | CVE-2026-79674 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-3gqm-fcw5-w839 | CVE-2026-63311 | medium | yes | |
| GHSA-568f-pv23-39p4 | CVE-2026-62385 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-6hm5-jgcp-p838 | CVE-2026-12072 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-6hwm-xvph-95vm | CVE-2026-78680 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-6ww7-3frv-cqxh | CVE-2026-78682 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-72r2-7mfr-5xr9 | CVE-2026-65915 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-8mpw-7fpc-4gqj | CVE-2026-81725 | medium | yes | |
| GHSA-97qj-x29f-37w7 | CVE-2026-78681 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-cv22-g7mw-8v73 | CVE-2026-71514 | low | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-cw6x-m8jw-qmrh | CVE-2026-81724 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L | yes |
| GHSA-f794-5jv7-7672 | CVE-2026-81727 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-ff5c-cp5c-9wjf | CVE-2026-12876 | medium | yes | |
| GHSA-fg7f-2386-8897 | CVE-2026-12061 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-m42h-3232-vpv3 | CVE-2026-12243 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-m4rf-3fr8-xwx3 | CVE-2026-79675 | critical | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-p3m8-78j2-g5p3 | CVE-2026-62388 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-p4gq-832x-fm9v | CVE-2026-54293 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-p4rw-rvv2-7xwr | CVE-2026-79676 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-qvv7-cg9c-w4x3 | CVE-2026-12075 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-qx2g-xrx7-vfh8 | CVE-2026-72818 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-rhp5-r9x4-f5g2 | CVE-2026-78683 | critical | yes | |
| GHSA-rrv8-h7p8-rx55 | CVE-2026-80205 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-vp2x-qp44-57v7 | CVE-2026-81723 | low | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L | yes |
| GHSA-w3v8-gmh9-3wv7 | CVE-2026-80206 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-ww6m-cw3f-q94g | CVE-2026-81722 | medium | yes | |
| GHSA-x5ph-mj9p-rfr8 | CVE-2026-63312 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-x99w-6fgc-pmfw | CVE-2026-79657 | critical | yes | |
| GHSA-xh95-f55m-82fw | CVE-2026-12074 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N | yes |
| PYSEC-2026-2078 | CVE-2026-54293 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N | yes |
| PYSEC-2026-3581 | CVE-2026-12072 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N | yes |
| PYSEC-2026-3582 | CVE-2026-12061 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| PYSEC-2026-3583 | CVE-2026-12075 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N | yes |
| PYSEC-2026-3584 | CVE-2026-12074 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N | yes |
| PYSEC-2026-3722 | CVE-2026-62388 | none | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-3723 | CVE-2026-63311 | none | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-3728 | CVE-2026-62385 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N | yes |
| PYSEC-2026-3730 | CVE-2026-63312 | none | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-3731 | CVE-2026-65915 | none | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-3733 | CVE-2026-78682 | none | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-3734 | CVE-2026-78683 | none | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-3735 | CVE-2026-79657 | none | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-3736 | CVE-2026-79674 | none | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-3737 | CVE-2026-79676 | none | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-3738 | CVE-2026-81722 | none | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-3739 | CVE-2026-81724 | none | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-3740 | CVE-2026-81726 | none | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-3741 | CVE-2026-81727 | none | yes | |
| PYSEC-2026-3748 | CVE-2026-78681 | none | yes |
Showing 50 of 62 vulnerabilities.
Background: What a vulnerability scan can and cannot prove →
Dependencies 163 packages
| Packages resolved | 163 |
|---|---|
| Deprecated | 1 |
| Stale | 20 |
| Tree resolution | Partial |
The dependency tree was only partially resolved, so these counts may be incomplete.
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
Tools for package channels are captured by running the package in an isolated sandbox. The most recent sandbox run could not capture a tool list from this package.
What is the Aviation Accident Analysis MCP server?
Aviation Accident Analysis MCP is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.hzy9981/aviation-accident-analysis. Aviation accident report parsing and prompt generation service under the SHELL framework. This page covers its PyPI package (aviation-accident-analysis).
Is the Aviation Accident Analysis MCP server still maintained?
Aviation Accident Analysis MCP is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 22 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the Aviation Accident Analysis MCP server under?
Aviation Accident Analysis MCP declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.