Coating Lab
PYPI · COATINGLAB-MCP
Real surface finishes for game gun models: sourced finishes, variants, wear baked from use
Available components
Last scanned (3 hours ago)
Scores higher than 66% of PyPI servers
Category Design and Media
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security100
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- Runs hatchling.build at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
- 1 of 29 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 2 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability52
- AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
- Tool/resource definitions use about 719 tokens (~55/item across 13 items; 13 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage73
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 19% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 13 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 14 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Unverified: 1 category
A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 15 Oct 26 64
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 17 Oct 2026 · Analysed pypi/coatinglab-mcp@0.1.0
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | pypi |
| Reason | No attestation published |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Install scripts 1 script
| Hook | Tier | Command |
|---|---|---|
| build_backend | allowlisted | hatchling.build |
Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →
Dependencies 29 packages
| Packages resolved | 29 |
|---|---|
| No linked repository | 1 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
bake ~46
Bakes the wear masks into a copy of the model (FBX for an engine, .blend for renders): about a minute.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | – | – | – |
| spec | object | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
check_coating ~36
Each variant against its wear level's band, wear kept out of corners, every finish physical.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| bake_folder | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
check_finish ~57
A finish of your own against the rules before you add it.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| finish | object | yes | a finish: {name, substrates, base {linear, metallic, roughness}, worn_to, sources} |
| finish_id | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
check_library ~29
The library against the physical rules: the finishes that break one, and why (empty: all hold).
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
describe_model ~42
Any model's meshes and material slots (an FBX), to write a coating spec for a model Model Lab did not make.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| fbx | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
engine_params ~39
A variant's values by slot for an engine material that follows the shared wear formula.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| spec | object | yes | – |
| variant | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_finishes ~36
Every finish: name, process, colour (sRGB hex), metallic, roughness, what it wears to, measured or estimated.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_templates ~45
The ready variant sets (e.g. ar15: issued, new_black, fde_two_tone, odg_ceramic, tungsten_stainless, abused_parkerized).
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_wear_levels ~33
The wear levels (new, issued, worn, abused): each mask's threshold and what the level looks like.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
read_finish ~26
One finish in full, with its notes and sources.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| finish | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
render_variants ~53
Look-dev renders of the variants (labelled: not a game's view) and a sheet of them.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| bake_folder | string | yes | – |
| variants | – | – | – |
| views | – | – | right, left, close |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
spec_for_modellab ~61
A coating spec for a Model Lab build: a template's variants on the slots it has, the wear zones from its marks.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| build | string | yes | a Model Lab build folder |
| template | string | – | – |
| variants | – | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
validate_spec ~38
Every problem with a coating spec: a slot without a finish, a finish that does not go on its material.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| spec | object | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Coating Lab MCP server?
Coating Lab runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx coatinglab-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
pypi · coatinglab-mcp
claude mcp add hpdkhoa-coatinglab-mcp -- uvx coatinglab-mcp
What is the Coating Lab MCP server?
Coating Lab is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.hpdkhoa/coatinglab-mcp. Real surface finishes for game gun models: sourced finishes, variants, wear baked from use. This page covers its PyPI package (coatinglab-mcp).
Is the Coating Lab MCP server safe to use?
Coating Lab scores 64 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 17 October 2026. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Coating Lab MCP server expose?
Coating Lab exposes 13 tools: list_finishes, read_finish, check_library, check_finish, list_wear_levels, and 8 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 541 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the Coating Lab MCP server still maintained?
Coating Lab is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 17 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the Coating Lab MCP server under?
Coating Lab declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.