Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Gas Fee Predictor

REMOTE · API.GASFEEPREDICTOR.COM · 2 COMPONENTS

Live Ethereum and L2 gas fees: current gas, cheapest L2, forecast, ETH price, cost estimates.

+3 this week 72 Trust /100

Last scanned (11 hours ago)

Scores higher than 58% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Crypto and Web3

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security46
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability80
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 530 tokens (~75/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management80
  • Stability observed for 24 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (11)

  • TLS certificate
  • HSTS header
  • DNSSEC
  • Transport
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Checks we could not complete (2)

These are gaps on our side, not findings about this hosted endpoint. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.

  • Authorization in Endpoint SecurityAuthorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 7 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe.
  • HTTPS in Endpoint SecurityHTTPS enforcement could not be verified: the plaintext port answered with HTTP 405, which proves neither a plaintext path nor enforcement.

Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)

  • Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
  • Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 20 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://api.gasfeepredictor.com/api/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=api.gasfeepredictor.com CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 27 Sept 2026 26 Dec 2026 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 552413f11340fdb4eb05a6b4d6774f91860
SANs: api.gasfeepredictor.com
CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of api.gasfeepredictor.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. Trust anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. DS published 19718 13 Verified
gasfeepredictor.com. No DS Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://api.gasfeepredictor.com/api/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://api.gasfeepredictor.com/api/mcp Inconclusive 405
MCP tools · 7 exposed · ~458 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
best_time_to_transact ~40

Find out whether to send a transaction now or wait — returns the current recommendation, expected savings, and when the next cheaper gas window is predicted.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

estimate_transaction_cost ~120

Estimate the current USD gas cost of a specific Ethereum mainnet action (ETH transfer, ERC-20/USDC transfer, Uniswap swap, or NFT mint), or a custom gas-units amount, at the chosen priority tier.

NameTypeReqDescription
actionstringyesThe transaction type. Use "custom" with gas_units for anything else.
gas_unitsnumber–Required when action is "custom": the gas units the transaction uses.
tierstring–Priority tier: low (cheapest), average, or high (fastest).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_current_gas ~58

Get the current Ethereum mainnet gas price (low / average / high, in Gwei) plus the live ETH/USD price and a send-now-vs-wait recommendation. Use this to answer "what is the gas fee right now".

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_eth_price ~23

Get the current ETH/USD spot price and its 24-hour change.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_gas_forecast ~76

Get the forward-looking hourly Ethereum gas forecast (up to 24 hours ahead) with the predicted cheapest window. Use for "when will gas be cheaper", "should I wait until tomorrow", or planning a transaction.

NameTypeReqDescription
hoursinteger–How many hours ahead to return (1-24). Defaults to 12.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_gas_history ~72

Get recent historical Ethereum mainnet gas prices over a chosen window, with min/max/average. Use to answer "what has gas been doing", "was gas cheaper yesterday", or to compare the current price against a recent baseline.

NameTypeReqDescription
rangestring–Look-back window. Defaults to 1d.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_l2_gas ~69

Compare live Layer-2 gas fees across Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, and Polygon (Gwei and the estimated wallet fee in USD for a standard transfer), and identify the cheapest right now. Use for "cheapest L2" / "L2 gas fees" questions.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Gas Fee Predictor MCP server?

Gas Fee Predictor is a hosted endpoint at https://api.gasfeepredictor.com/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · api.gasfeepredictor.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http higherbeing-gasfeepredictor-mcp 'https://api.gasfeepredictor.com/api/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Gas Fee Predictor MCP server?

Gas Fee Predictor is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.higherbeing/gasfeepredictor-mcp. Live Ethereum and L2 gas fees: current gas, cheapest L2, forecast, ETH price, cost estimates. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://api.gasfeepredictor.com/api/mcp).

Is the Gas Fee Predictor MCP server safe to use?

Gas Fee Predictor scores 72 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Gas Fee Predictor MCP server expose?

Gas Fee Predictor exposes 7 tools: get_current_gas, get_l2_gas, get_eth_price, best_time_to_transact, estimate_transaction_cost, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 458 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Gas Fee Predictor MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Gas Fee Predictor without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Gas Fee Predictor MCP server still maintained?

Gas Fee Predictor is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What did VerifyMCP test on the Gas Fee Predictor MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 11 checks on Gas Fee Predictor, covering TLS certificate, HSTS header, DNSSEC, Transport and 7 more. 2 items could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about Gas Fee Predictor: Authorization and HTTPS. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.