io.github.HewlettPackard/greenlake-subscriptions-mcp
PYPI · GREENLAKE-SUBSCRIPTIONS-MCP
HPE GreenLake subscriptions MCP Server
Available components
Last scanned (15 hours ago)
Scores higher than 30% of PyPI servers
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security99
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- Known CVEs were checked across the 38 of 39 dependencies we could resolve, so this covers what we could see, not the whole tree.Partial
- Runs hatchling.build at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
- Dependency health was assessed across the 38 of 39 dependencies we could resolve, so this covers what we could see, not the whole tree. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency48
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (Apache-2.0).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 162 days ago).Pass
- Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
- Schema quality not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no schema to assess.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no schema to compare.Unverified
Tool Coverage0
- Tool coverage not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no tool definitions to assess.Unverified
Tool Safety0
- Tool safety not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no tool text to scan.Unverified
Capabilities0
- Protocol version not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we never saw its MCP handshake.Unverified
Unverified: 5 categories
Categories scored 0 because our sandbox has not given us the schema these checks need to read. That is a gap on our side rather than a finding about the package, and we only credit what we can confirm, so the score stands at 0 until the capture succeeds. We are working through the fleet, so this normally clears without any action from you. How we score packages →
Checks we ran (9)
- Malware scan
- Known CVEs
- Install scripts
- Dependency health
- Source repository
- Provenance
- License
- Maintenance
- Security disclosure
Checks we could not complete (5)
These are gaps on our side, not findings about this package. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.
- Schema quality in Schema Quality & AI Usability (scores 0 for this)Schema quality not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no schema to assess.
- Stability in Stability & Change Management (scores 0 for this)Stability not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no schema to compare.
- Tool coverage in Tool Coverage (scores 0 for this)Tool coverage not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no tool definitions to assess.
- Tool safety in Tool Safety (scores 0 for this)Tool safety not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no tool text to scan.
- Capabilities in Capabilities (scores 0 for this)Protocol version not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we never saw its MCP handshake.
Does not apply to this package (2)
- Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
- Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 29 Oct 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 8 Oct 26 −15
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- 3 Oct 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 1 Oct 26 24
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- 30 Sept 26 0
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 29 Sept 26 0
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- 28 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 26 Sept 26 0
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed pypi/greenlake-subscriptions-mcp@1.1.2
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | pypi |
| Reason | No attestation published |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Install scripts 1 script
| Hook | Tier | Command |
|---|---|---|
| build_backend | Known build tool | hatchling.build |
Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →
Dependencies 38 packages
| Packages resolved | 38 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 3 |
| No linked repository | 1 |
| Tree resolution | Partial |
The dependency tree was only partially resolved, so these counts may be incomplete.
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
Tools for package channels are captured by running the package in an isolated sandbox. The most recent sandbox run could not capture a tool list from this package.
How do I install the io.github.HewlettPackard/greenlake-subscriptions-mcp server?
io.github.HewlettPackard/greenlake-subscriptions-mcp runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx greenlake-subscriptions-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
pypi · greenlake-subscriptions-mcp
claude mcp add hewlettpackard-greenlake-subscriptions-mcp -- uvx greenlake-subscriptions-mcp
What is the io.github.HewlettPackard/greenlake-subscriptions-mcp server?
io.github.HewlettPackard/greenlake-subscriptions-mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.HewlettPackard/greenlake-subscriptions-mcp. HPE GreenLake subscriptions MCP Server. This page covers its PyPI package (greenlake-subscriptions-mcp).
Is the io.github.HewlettPackard/greenlake-subscriptions-mcp server safe to use?
io.github.HewlettPackard/greenlake-subscriptions-mcp scores 39 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
Is the io.github.HewlettPackard/greenlake-subscriptions-mcp server still maintained?
io.github.HewlettPackard/greenlake-subscriptions-mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the io.github.HewlettPackard/greenlake-subscriptions-mcp server under?
io.github.HewlettPackard/greenlake-subscriptions-mcp declares the Apache-2.0 licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.
What did VerifyMCP test on the io.github.HewlettPackard/greenlake-subscriptions-mcp server?
VerifyMCP ran 9 checks on io.github.HewlettPackard/greenlake-subscriptions-mcp, covering Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health and 5 more. 5 items could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about io.github.HewlettPackard/greenlake-subscriptions-mcp: Schema quality, Stability, Tool coverage, Tool safety and 1 more. 5 categories score 0 for that reason, because we only credit what we can confirm. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to a PyPI package, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.