Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Model Ruler — AI Cost Calculators

REMOTE · MODELRULER.DEV

Read-only AI/LLM cost tools with current MCP discovery and attributable Registry transport.

Available components

+3 this week 74 Trust /100

Last scanned (12 hours ago)

Scores higher than 66% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 23 Oct 2026.

Category AI and Machine Learning

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability83
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 2015 tokens (~167/item across 12 items; 12 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Tools include usage examples.Pass
Stability & Change Management53
  • Stability observed for 16 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety75
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • 0 of 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation; "eval-cost-calculator" implies "eval" and declares readOnlyHint instead, contradicting what its own name says it does. See how to fix → Fail
  • An AI judge read all 13 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 22 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 20 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 18 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 16 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 14 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 12 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 9 Oct 26 +1
    • Stability: unverified → 0.07 ▲ functional
  • 7 Oct 26 67

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 23 Oct 2026 · Probed https://modelruler.dev/mcp?dist=model_everywhere_registry_native_official_registry

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=modelruler.dev CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 27 Sept 2026 26 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 a73715fba800d2080e9308d4770c4263
SANs: modelruler.dev, *.modelruler.dev
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of modelruler.dev. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
dev. present 60074 8 Verified
modelruler.dev. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://modelruler.dev/mcp?dist=model_everywhere_registry_native_official_registry Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://modelruler.dev/mcp?dist=model_everywhere_registry_native_official_registry Inconclusive 405
MCP tools · 12 exposed · ~1,867 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
agent-loop-cost-calculator ~243

Use for LLM inference/reasoning cost per successful multi-step agent task, including failure overhead and context growth across turns. Use agent-workflow-cost-calculator for iPaaS/app-action/MCP orchestration fees. Use automation-cost-calculator for generic Zapier/Make/n8n workflow billing.

NameTypeReqDescription
avg_tokens_in_per_turnnumber–Avg input tokens per turn (default 3000)
avg_tokens_out_per_turnnumber–Avg output tokens per turn (default 400)
context_growth_factornumber–Multiplier on input tokens as conversation grows (default 1.4)
modelstring–LLM model (default claude-sonnet-4-6)
providerstring–LLM provider (default anthropic)
steps_per_tasknumber–Avg reasoning steps per task (default 5)
success_ratenumber–Task success rate 0-1 (default 0.7)
tasks_per_monthnumberyesTasks attempted per month
tool_calls_per_stepnumber–Avg tool invocations per step (default 2)

No output schema declared.

{"tasks_per_month":60000}
agent-workflow-cost-calculator ~158

Use for automation-platform/iPaaS cost of an AI agent workflow, including app-action fan-out and MCP tool-call accounting, explicitly excluding LLM token spend. Use automation-cost-calculator for generic non-agent workflow billing. Use agent-loop-cost-calculator for LLM inference/reasoning cost per successful multi-step agent task.

NameTypeReqDescription
agent_runs_per_monthnumberyesAgent workflow runs per month
app_actions_per_runnumber–Downstream app actions per agent run (default 3)
make_modules_per_runnumber–Make modules per run; defaults to app actions + MCP calls
mcp_tool_calls_per_runnumber–MCP tool calls per agent run (default 1)

No output schema declared.

{"agent_runs_per_month":20000}
automation-cost-calculator ~146

Use for generic or non-agent recurring workflow platform billing across Zapier task billing, Make credit billing, and n8n execution billing. Use agent-workflow-cost-calculator instead when the workflow is explicitly an AI agent with app actions or MCP tool calls. Use agent-loop-cost-calculator instead when the question is about LLM inference/reasoning cost per successful agent task.

NameTypeReqDescription
billable_steps_per_runnumber–Billable actions/modules per run (default 5)
make_modules_per_runnumber–Make module actions per scenario run; defaults to billable_steps_per_run
workflow_runs_per_monthnumberyesWorkflow/scenario runs per month

No output schema declared.

{"workflow_runs_per_month":120000}
context-window-planner ~121

Use when a user needs to know whether a document plus prompt plus output fits within a model's context window, or wants a strategy recommendation (truncate/summarize/rag/chunk).

NameTypeReqDescription
doc_tokensnumberyesPrimary document/content tokens
expected_out_tokensnumber–Reserved output budget (default 1000)
model_context_windownumberyesTarget model context size
overhead_tokensnumber–System prompt + few-shot + history (default 2000)
strategy_hintstring–Preferred strategy (optional)

No output schema declared.

{"doc_tokens":18000,"model_context_window":200000}
eval-cost-calculator ~205

Use when a user needs to budget an LLM evaluation run. Given samples/models/trials, returns total cost, per-run cost, and parallel time estimate.

NameTypeReqDescription
avg_tokens_innumber–Avg input tokens per sample (default 2000)
avg_tokens_outnumber–Avg output tokens per sample (default 500)
judge_enabledboolean–Enable LLM-as-judge second pass (default false)
judge_tokens_innumber–Judge input tokens (default 1500)
judge_tokens_outnumber–Judge output tokens (default 200)
modelstring–Eval model (default claude-sonnet-4-6)
modelsnumber–Candidate models (default 1)
providerstring–Eval provider (default anthropic)
samplesnumberyesNumber of eval samples
trials_per_samplenumber–Repeats per sample (default 1)

No output schema declared.

{"samples":2000}
fine-tune-roi-calculator ~163

Use when a user is considering fine-tuning vs prompt engineering. Returns training cost, monthly inference savings, months-to-ROI, and breakeven volume.

NameTypeReqDescription
base_inference_cost_1mnumber–Baseline API output cost per 1M
finetuned_inference_cost_1mnumber–Fine-tuned inference cost per 1M
monthly_inference_tokensnumberyesExpected monthly inference volume (output tokens)
prompt_reduction_pctnumber–Prompt size reduction % from eliminating few-shot (default 0)
train_cost_per_1mnumber–Training cost per 1M tokens
train_tokensnumberyesTraining tokens (dataset × epochs)

No output schema declared.

{"monthly_inference_tokens":300000000,"train_tokens":50000000}
observability-cost-calculator ~95

Use when a user needs to budget LLM observability tooling. Returns monthly cost at given request volume with retention adjustment.

NameTypeReqDescription
avg_log_bytesnumber–Avg payload bytes per traced request (default 4096)
providerstringyesObservability provider
requests_per_daynumberyesAverage daily LLM requests
retention_daysnumber–Retention in days (default 30)

No output schema declared.

{"provider":"langsmith","requests_per_day":50000}
provider-cost-calculator ~145

Use when a user asks what an LLM workload costs on a specific provider/model, or wants to compare cost across providers. Given tokens per call and call volume, returns monthly cost plus a tier comparison table.

NameTypeReqDescription
calls_per_monthnumber–Monthly call volume
include_comparisonboolean–Include tier comparison table (default true)
modelstring–Target model (e.g. claude-sonnet-4-6)
providerstring–Target provider (e.g. anthropic, openai, together)
tokens_innumberyesInput tokens per call
tokens_outnumberyesOutput tokens per call

No output schema declared.

{"calls_per_month":100000,"tokens_in":1200,"tokens_out":400}
quantization-calculator ~124

Use when a user is planning to quantize an LLM to fit on smaller hardware. Given parameter count and precision transition, returns VRAM requirement, speedup estimate, and approximate quality delta.

NameTypeReqDescription
batch_sizenumber–Serving batch size (default 1)
kv_cache_tokensnumber–Max KV cache tokens (default 8192)
params_billionsnumberyesModel parameter count in billions
precision_fromstring–Starting precision (default bf16)
precision_tostring–Target precision (default int4)

No output schema declared.

{"params_billions":8}
rag-pipeline-cost-calculator ~215

Use when a user needs end-to-end RAG cost estimation (embedding + vector store + generation). Returns monthly cost with breakdown and dominant-component identification.

NameTypeReqDescription
answer_tokensnumber–Avg answer tokens (default 400)
chunk_size_tokensnumber–Avg chunk size (default 512)
chunks_retrievednumber–Chunks per query (default 5)
corpus_tokensnumberyesIndexed corpus size in tokens
embedding_providerstring–Embedding model
generator_modelstring–Generator model (default claude-sonnet-4-6)
generator_providerstring–Generator LLM provider (default anthropic)
queries_per_daynumberyesUser query volume per day
question_tokensnumber–Avg question tokens (default 100)
reindex_fraction_per_monthnumber–Fraction of corpus re-embedded per month (default 0.1)
vector_storestring–Vector store

No output schema declared.

{"corpus_tokens":25000000,"queries_per_day":5000}
self-host-breakeven-calculator ~161

Use when a user is deciding between API usage and self-hosted GPU inference at a given volume. Returns breakeven token volume, monthly cost comparison, and go/no-go recommendation.

NameTypeReqDescription
api_cost_per_1m_outnumber–Current API output cost per 1M tokens
gpu_providerstring–GPU provider (e.g. runpod, modal)
gpu_typestring–GPU type (e.g. h100, a100-80gb)
monthly_tokensnumberyesMonthly output token volume
operational_overhead_pctnumber–Ops overhead % on GPU cost (default 40)
utilization_pctnumber–Expected GPU utilization % (default 60)

No output schema declared.

{"monthly_tokens":750000000}
token-counter ~91

Use when a user asks how many tokens a given text will consume, or needs to estimate prompt size before pricing a workload. Given text and tokenizer family, returns low/high token range and byte-level measurements.

NameTypeReqDescription
expected_out_tokensnumber–Expected output token budget (optional)
textstringyesText content to count tokens for
tokenizerstring–Tokenizer family (default: default)

No output schema declared.

{"text":"Summarize the Q3 board deck into five concise bullet points for the exec team."}
Install

How do I install the Model Ruler — AI Cost Calculators MCP server?

Model Ruler — AI Cost Calculators is a hosted endpoint at https://modelruler.dev/mcp?dist=model_everywhere_registry_native_official_registry, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · modelruler.dev

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http helphub369-model-ruler 'https://modelruler.dev/mcp?dist=model_everywhere_registry_native_official_registry'
Common questions

What is the Model Ruler — AI Cost Calculators MCP server?

Model Ruler — AI Cost Calculators is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.helphub369/model-ruler. Read-only AI/LLM cost tools with current MCP discovery and attributable Registry transport. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://modelruler.dev/mcp?dist=model_everywhere_registry_native_official_registry).

Is the Model Ruler — AI Cost Calculators MCP server safe to use?

Model Ruler — AI Cost Calculators scores 74 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Model Ruler — AI Cost Calculators MCP server expose?

Model Ruler — AI Cost Calculators exposes 12 tools: token-counter, provider-cost-calculator, self-host-breakeven-calculator, context-window-planner, quantization-calculator, and 7 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,867 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Model Ruler — AI Cost Calculators MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Model Ruler — AI Cost Calculators without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Model Ruler — AI Cost Calculators MCP server still maintained?

Model Ruler — AI Cost Calculators is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 23 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.