The AI Agent Index
REMOTE · THEAIAGENTINDEX.COM
Search AI agents and agencies: pricing, MCP support, integrations, categories and ratings.
Available components
Last scanned (23 hours ago)
Scores higher than 69% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.
Category Search and Retrieval
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability71
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 760 tokens (~152/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management30
- Stability observed for 9 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 3 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 1 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 30 Oct 26 +1
- “search_agents” reworded the description of “agent_type” cosmetic
1 cosmetic change on this day. Switch on “Show cosmetic changes” to see it.
- 28 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 27 Oct 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 26 Oct 26 73
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://theaiagentindex.com/mcp/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=theaiagentindex.com | CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 20 Sept 2026 | 19 Dec 2026 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 55b818a03d32e7f4b01e40ea0f6f258ea4b |
| SANs: theaiagentindex.com | ||||||
| CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319 |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of theaiagentindex.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| theaiagentindex.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://theaiagentindex.com/mcp/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://theaiagentindex.com/mcp/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://theaiagentindex.com/mcp/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
get_agency Get Agency Details ~41
Get full structured details for a specific AI automation agency by its slug identifier.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | string | yes | The agency slug identifier e.g. taycon-ai |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| clients | array | yes | – |
| company_type | – | yes | – |
| description | string | yes | – |
| headquarters | – | yes | – |
| hourly_rate | – | yes | – |
| industries | array | yes | – |
| long_description | – | yes | – |
| min_budget | – | yes | – |
| name | string | yes | – |
| pricing_model | – | yes | – |
| rating | number | yes | – |
| regions | array | yes | – |
| review_count | number | yes | – |
| services | array | yes | – |
| slug | string | yes | – |
| team_size | – | yes | – |
| tools | array | yes | – |
| url | string | yes | – |
| website | – | yes | – |
No examples provided.
get_agent Get Agent Details ~89
Get full structured details for a specific AI agent by its slug identifier. Returns pricing, capabilities, integrations, agent_type, pros, limitations, buyer decision fields, and ratings. Competitor price references and GitHub star counts are resolved to live values before returning.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | string | yes | The agent slug identifier e.g. apollo-io, cursor, intercom-fin, github-copilot |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| agent_type | – | yes | – |
| best_for | – | yes | – |
| billing_period | – | yes | What starting_price means: annual (this is the annual-commit rate, month-to-month costs more), monthly (no commitment), usage (consumption-based, see price_unit), or null (unclassified, treat as mont… |
| capabilities | – | yes | – |
| category | – | yes | – |
| community_rating | object | – | Community (user) review average and count. Present only when real user reviews exist; distinct from the editorial rating. |
| contract_type | – | yes | – |
| data_training | – | yes | – |
| deployment | – | yes | – |
| description | – | yes | – |
| developer | string | yes | – |
| difficulty | – | yes | – |
| editorial_rating | object | yes | – |
| g2_rating | – | yes | – |
| g2_review_count | – | yes | – |
| github_stars | – | yes | – |
| human_in_loop | – | yes | – |
| integrations | – | yes | – |
| last_verified_at | – | yes | – |
| limitations | – | yes | – |
| long_description | – | yes | – |
| mcp_compatible | – | yes | – |
| mcp_status | – | yes | – |
| name | string | yes | – |
| price_currency | – | yes | The ISO currency code that starting_price is denominated in, e.g. USD or EUR. Never assume dollars. |
| price_unit | – | yes | What one unit of starting_price buys. For usage pricing (billing_period = usage) this is the billable unit, e.g. "per resolution", "per ticket", "per minute". For subscription pricing it is the entit… |
| pricing | – | yes | – |
| pricing_transparency | – | yes | – |
| pricing_url | – | yes | – |
| pros | – | yes | – |
| security_certifications | – | yes | – |
| segment | – | yes | – |
| slug | string | yes | – |
| starting_price | – | yes | – |
| url | string | yes | – |
| website | – | yes | – |
No examples provided.
list_categories List Categories ~41
List all available categories in the AI Agent Index, including AI agent software categories and the AI Automation Agencies services directory. Returns slugs, display names, and counts.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| categories | array | yes | All categories with slugs, display names, type (agents or agencies), and counts |
No examples provided.
search_agencies Search AI Automation Agencies ~188
Search the AI Agent Index for AI automation agencies (services firms that build AI solutions for clients). Filter by service type, industry, tools, or region.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| industry | string | – | Industry served e.g. SaaS, Finance, Healthcare, Manufacturing |
| limit | number | – | Number of results to return, max 20 |
| query | string | – | Free text search across agency names and descriptions |
| region | string | – | Region served e.g. North America, Europe, Global / Remote |
| service | string | – | Service tag: ai-agent-building, workflow-automation, ai-strategy, chatbot-development, custom-integrations, voice-agents, rag-development, data-pipeline, prompt-engineering, ai-training |
| tool | string | – | Tool or platform specialization e.g. openai, anthropic, langchain, make, n8n, zapier |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| agencies | array | yes | Array of matching agencies |
| count | number | yes | Number of agencies returned |
No examples provided.
search_agents Search AI Agents ~401
Search the AI Agent Index for agents matching specific criteria. Returns structured agent data. Use this to find agents by category, sub-type, pricing model, integration, capability tag, or MCP role (mcp=server finds agents that expose an MCP server).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| agent_type | string | – | Sub-type within a category for precise matching. Examples: prospecting, ai-sdr, crm, sales-engagement (sales); helpdesk, ticket-resolution, chatbot, voice-agent (support); academic-research, deep-res… |
| capability | string | – | Capability tag e.g. lead-generation, ticket-resolution, code-generation, web-search, autonomous |
| category | string | – | Category slug: ai-sales-agents, ai-customer-support-agents, ai-research-agents, ai-marketing-agents, ai-coding-agents, ai-hr-agents, ai-workflow-agents, ai-customer-success-agents |
| integration | string | – | Integration name e.g. HubSpot, Salesforce, Slack, Zapier |
| limit | number | – | Number of results to return, max 20 |
| mcp | string | – | MCP role: server (product exposes an MCP server agents can connect to), client (connects out to external servers), both, or none |
| pricing | string | – | Pricing model: free, freemium, subscription, usage-based, custom |
| query | string | – | Free text search across agent names and descriptions |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| agents | array | yes | Array of matching agents with full structured details |
| count | number | yes | Number of agents returned |
No examples provided.
How do I install the The AI Agent Index MCP server?
The AI Agent Index is a hosted endpoint at https://theaiagentindex.com/mcp/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · theaiagentindex.com
claude mcp add --transport http heathermacavelia-cell-ai-agent-index 'https://theaiagentindex.com/mcp/mcp'
What is the The AI Agent Index MCP server?
The AI Agent Index is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.heathermacavelia-cell/ai-agent-index. Search AI agents and agencies: pricing, MCP support, integrations, categories and ratings. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://theaiagentindex.com/mcp/mcp).
Is the The AI Agent Index MCP server safe to use?
The AI Agent Index scores 77 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the The AI Agent Index MCP server expose?
The AI Agent Index exposes 5 tools: search_agents, get_agent, list_categories, search_agencies, get_agency. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 760 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the The AI Agent Index MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to The AI Agent Index without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the The AI Agent Index MCP server still maintained?
The AI Agent Index is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.