Kronos
PYPI · KRONOS-MCP
Stock price forecasting for China A-shares — Kronos K-line time-series model
Available components
Last scanned (17 hours ago)
Scores higher than 87% of PyPI servers
Category Finance and Payments
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security100
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- Runs hatchling.build at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
- 1 of 31 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency48
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (Apache-2.0).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 54 days ago).Pass
- Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability79
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 346 tokens (~173/item across 2 items; 2 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage71
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 2 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 2 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 3 Nov 26 −15
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- 31 Oct 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 30 Oct 26 −1
- Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
- 28 Oct 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 27 Oct 26 −15
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- 26 Oct 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 25 Oct 26 −15
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Analysed pypi/kronos-mcp@0.1.2
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | pypi |
| Reason | No attestation published |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Install scripts 1 script
| Hook | Tier | Command |
|---|---|---|
| build_backend | allowlisted | hatchling.build |
Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →
Dependencies 31 packages
| Packages resolved | 31 |
|---|---|
| No linked repository | 1 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
kronos_health ~72
确认 Kronos 服务能连上、你的 key 是有效的。 **遇到任何问题先调这个。**它能把「key 不对」和「代码不对」区分开 —— 直接调 predict 失败时,这两种原因看起来是一样的。
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
kronos_predict ~274
预测一只股票未来 N 根日 K 线。 symbol A 股代码,`600519` 或 `600519.SH` 两种写法都认 pred_len 预测多少根,1~30。默认 10 返回每根预测 K 线的 date / open / high / low / close / volume, 外加 `last_close`(最后一根真实收盘价)和 `expected_return` (末根预测收盘 / 最后真实收盘 − 1)—— 这个比例是最常用的那个数。 ⚠️ **一次调用要 30-70 秒**(GPU 推理),这是正常的,不要因为慢就重试。 要问多只票就依次调用,不要指望批量 —— 上游一次只接受一个代码。 ⚠️ **只有 A 股有数据。** 问美股或港股会返回 symbol_not_found。 ⚠️ 这是模型的**统计外推,不是投资建议**。它没有读新闻、不知道停牌和财报, 极端行情下会显著偏离。把它当成一个参考信号,不要当结论。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| pred_len | integer | – | – |
| symbol | string | yes | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
How do I install the Kronos MCP server?
Kronos runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx kronos-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
pypi · kronos-mcp
claude mcp add hangeaiagent-kronos-mcp -- uvx kronos-mcp
What is the Kronos MCP server?
Kronos is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.hangeaiagent/kronos-mcp. Stock price forecasting for China A-shares, Kronos K-line time-series model. This page covers its PyPI package (kronos-mcp).
Is the Kronos MCP server safe to use?
Kronos scores 84 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 4 November 2026. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Kronos MCP server expose?
Kronos exposes 2 tools: kronos_health, kronos_predict. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 346 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the Kronos MCP server still maintained?
Kronos is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the Kronos MCP server under?
Kronos declares the Apache-2.0 licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.