Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

OpenHire · 哨兵

PYPI · OPENHIRE · SCANNED SEP 22

Radar for remote AI/Infra jobs from employer ATS; your résumé never transits the server.

Available components

−12 this week 58 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security49
  • Malware scan not yet available for this package.Unverified
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • Runs hatchling.build at install time, a recognised native-build step with no shell scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
  • 6 of 54 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
Schema Quality & AI Usability56
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 2719 tokens (~453/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management60
  • Stability observed for 18 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage71
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
  • Structured output schemas are declared (17% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Install

How do I install the OpenHire · 哨兵 MCP server?

OpenHire · 哨兵 runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx openhire. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

pypi · openhire

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add gzchenhao-openhire -- uvx openhire
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "gzchenhao-openhire": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "openhire"
      ]
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "gzchenhao-openhire": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "openhire"
      ]
    }
  }
}
# add to Codex CLI
codex mcp add gzchenhao-openhire -- uvx openhire
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "gzchenhao-openhire": {
      "type": "local",
      "command": [
        "uvx",
        "openhire"
      ],
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add gzchenhao-openhire --command uvx --arg openhire
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  gzchenhao-openhire:
    command: "uvx"
    args: ["openhire"]
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "gzchenhao-openhire": {
      "Transport": "stdio",
      "Command": "uvx",
      "Arguments": [
        "openhire"
      ]
    }
  }
}
# add to Vellum
assistant mcp add gzchenhao-openhire -t stdio -c uvx -a openhire
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "gzchenhao-openhire": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "openhire"
      ]
    }
  }
}
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 22 Sept 26 −15
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified security
    • Schema quality: 374 → 453 functional
    • Package version: 0.6.0 → 0.6.1 functional
  • 21 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 18 Sept 26 +16
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass security
  • 17 Sept 26 −15
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified security
  • 16 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 15 Sept 26 +15
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass security
  • 14 Sept 26 −15
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified security
    • Schema quality: 257 → 374 functional
    • Package version: 0.5.1 → 0.6.0 functional
  • 13 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 22 Sept 2026 · Analysed pypi/openhire@0.6.1

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem pypi

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Install scripts 1 script
Hook Tier Command
build_backend allowlisted hatchling.build

Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →

Dependencies 54 packages
Packages resolved 54
Stale 5
No linked repository 1
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 6 exposed · ~2,595 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
authorize_application ~203

Record an authorized, employer-direct application. REFUSES résumés. (Formerly `apply` — renamed to make explicit that this only records the user's authorization to apply as themselves; it never submits anything on their behalf.) This tool never accepts a résumé, file, cover letter, name, email or phone — a résumé never transits the server. It only takes a job_id, an anonymous fingerprint, and an explicit per-job authorization. On success it returns the apply_channel (the employer's own application URL) for the user to submit as themselves, plus resume_transmitted=false. Do NOT paste résumé content into any argument. Args: job_id: the job to apply to (from search_jobs / check_watches). fingerprint: the user's anonymous fingerprint. authorized: must be true — explicit per-job consent.

NameTypeReqDescription
authorizedbooleanyes
fingerprintstringyes
job_idstringyes

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

check_watches ~131

Pull matches that are new since this fingerprint's last check. stdio has no server push, so clients pull: call this at the start of a session. Returns the new matches per watch and advances each watch's last-notified marker. The FIRST pull on a watch returns everything matching it, not an increment: nothing has been reported for that watch before, so the whole standing set is new to the user. Each result says which it is via `is_first_pull`; do not present a first pull to the user as "postings that appeared since last time".

NameTypeReqDescription
fingerprintstringyes

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_company_info ~131

Aggregate, anonymous trust signals for one employer. Returns ghost_score_avg, active_jobs, and index_built_at (when the index was last built). NEVER returns any individual candidate data — the server holds none. `claimed` is true only when the employer has claimed this tenant and we verified them by corporate identity — never by payment, and it never affects ranking. It is the only signal here that comes from the employer rather than from their public ATS data, and it is what makes `response_sla_days` non-null on their postings.

NameTypeReqDescription
company_idstringyes

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

refresh_index ~349

Re-crawl ONE employer's public ATS now. Takes about a minute. Throttled to 6h. The index is refreshed weekly, so `search_jobs` can be up to seven days behind and `check_watches` has nothing new to report until it moves. This is the manual nudge for the case that matters: the user is about to act on one employer and wants today's truth. Rules worth knowing before you call it: * ONE employer per call. A full crawl is 20+ minutes and no client will wait; a vague word like "robot" is refused with the list of candidates rather than fanned out into eleven live crawls. * At most one crawl per employer per 6 hours. A throttled call returns immediately with `refreshed: false`, `reason: "throttled"` and `last_refreshed_at` — no network request is made. That is not an error: it means the data you already hold is that fresh. * Do NOT call this speculatively or in a loop. Every call hits somebody else's public endpoint. Search first; refresh only when the user needs today's state of one employer. Args: company: one employer — an id ("unitree") or any part of the name in either language ("宇树", "XPeng"). Ambiguous input is refused, not guessed. Returns: `refreshed` plus `last_refreshed_at` / `next_allowed_at`; when it did run, also jobs_new / jobs_updated / jobs_delisted / jobs_unchanged.

NameTypeReqDescription
companystringyes

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_jobs ~1,594

Search the live job index by hard filters; returns ranked JobPosting[]. The server does ONLY a hard filter plus a fixed ranking of match-quality × freshness — precise re-ranking is left to you, the client, which holds the user's context. Every result includes the five protocol fields (verified_at, source, ghost_score, response_sla_days, apply_channel) plus datePosted, days_open, remote_scope, eligible_regions, role_group and ghost_reason. `verified_at` and `ghost_score` answer DIFFERENT questions and routinely disagree: a posting confirmed live today can score 1.0. Live means the employer's ATS still returns it; the score means it has been returned for a long time, or keeps being relisted. `ghost_reason` says which input drove the score ("age only: open 367d, never relisted") so you can tell the user that instead of a bare number. Neither field measures intent — a long-open role can equally mean hard-to-fill. `response_sla_days` is null on almost every row, and that is a meaningful null: it is the employer's OWN committed reply window, set only when they claim their tenant. We never infer or estimate it — the application deep-links to the employer and never touches this server, so we cannot observe a reply even in principle. Read null as "no employer has claimed this tenant", never as "missing data" or "slow". `employer_correction` appears only when the employer has claimed this tenant and said something about this specific role. It is the employer's own account, verified by corporate identity, and it sits BESIDE ghost_score, never on it: `status: "evergreen"` explains a high score (they hire continuously, so there is no single opening to fill), it does not lower it. `status: "closed"` means they say they are no longer hiring even though their ATS still returns the row, so stop sending people there. `date_semantics: "requisition_created"` means their ATS reports the day the req was opened internally rather than the day it went live, so days_open overstates for…

NameTypeReqDescription
collapse_role_groupboolean
company
currency
limitinteger
min_salary
offsetinteger
remote
remote_scope
require_stated_salaryboolean
required_skills
role_family
skills
NameTypeReqDescription
resultyes

No examples provided.

watch_intent ~187

Register a standing intent so new matches can be pulled later. The caller supplies its OWN anonymous fingerprint (e.g. "#a3f9") — the client generates and owns it; the server stores but can never recover it, so persist it client-side and pass the identical one to check_watches. Only the fingerprint and non-PII filter keys are stored — never a name, email, phone or résumé. Accepted filter keys mirror search_jobs: `skills` (ANY-overlap), `required_skills` (ALL/AND — use this to keep sales / solutions-architect roles out), `remote` (bool), `role_family` (e.g. "engineering"), `min_salary` (int). Returns { watch_id, status, fingerprint, fingerprint_notice }.

NameTypeReqDescription
filtersobjectyes
fingerprintstringyes

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the OpenHire · 哨兵 MCP server?

OpenHire · 哨兵 is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.gzchenhao/openhire. Radar for remote AI/Infra jobs from employer ATS; your résumé never transits the server. This page covers its PyPI package (openhire).

Is the OpenHire · 哨兵 MCP server safe to use?

OpenHire · 哨兵 scores 58 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 22 September 2026. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the OpenHire · 哨兵 MCP server expose?

OpenHire · 哨兵 exposes 6 tools: search_jobs, get_company_info, watch_intent, refresh_index, check_watches, authorize_application. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 2,595 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the OpenHire · 哨兵 MCP server still maintained?

OpenHire · 哨兵 is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 22 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the OpenHire · 哨兵 MCP server under?

OpenHire · 哨兵 declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.