io.github.gustavoatar/remodeleriq
REMOTE · REMODELERIQ.COM
Check if a contractor's remodeling bid is fair: analyze a quote, get cost + labor estimates.
Available components
Last scanned (18 hours ago)
Scores higher than 90% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 6 Nov 2026.
Category Finance and Payments
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security74
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability80
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1809 tokens (~164/item across 11 items; 10 tools + 1 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 10 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 12 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities73
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
- Supports UI / widget rendering.Pass
Checks we ran (14)
- TLS certificate
- Authorization
- HTTPS
- HSTS header
- DNSSEC
- Transport
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
- Capabilities
Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)
- Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
- Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 6 Nov 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 28 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 17 Sept 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 16 Sept 26 0
- Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
- 26 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Aug 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 18 Aug 26 0
- Authorization: unverified → partial ▲ security
- Transport: fail → pass ▲ security
- MCP protocol: unverified → fail ▼ functional
- Endpoint reachability: not serving MCP → reachable ▲ functional
- Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- Schema quality: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- Stability: unverified → 0.77 ▲ functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 6 Nov 2026 · Probed https://remodeleriq.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=remodeleriq.com | CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 21 Sept 2026 | 20 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 6703fcf1868c7a6696536d65fa233aaf31c |
| SANs: *.remodeleriq.com, remodeleriq.com | ||||||
| CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115 |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of remodeleriq.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Trust anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | DS published | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| remodeleriq.com. | No DS | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://remodeleriq.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://remodeleriq.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://remodeleriq.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
analyze_bid ~238
Deprecated: prefer remodeleriq_analyze_bid. Analyze a home-remodeling contractor's bid/estimate for fairness and risk. Returns a 0-100 confidence score, red flags, a plain-English summary, and negotiation talk tracks. Note: analyses may contribute de-identified data to aggregate remodeling-risk research.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| bid_text | string | yes | The full text of the contractor's bid/estimate (line items, terms, scope). |
| bid_total | number | – | The total dollar amount of the bid, if known. |
| finish_tier | string | – | Quality tier of finishes specified in the bid. |
| scope_depth | string | – | Depth of work: cosmetic (paint/fixtures only), pull_and_replace (replace but not reconfigure), full_gut (down to studs), addition (new square footage). |
| square_footage | number | – | Project area in square feet, if known (e.g. 200 for a bathroom, 400 for a kitchen). |
| state_code | string | – | Two-letter US state code (e.g. 'TX', 'GA') for localized labor/legal context. Defaults to GA. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| _meta | object | – | – |
| confidence_score | number | yes | 0–100 bid confidence score |
| missing_items | array | yes | – |
| negotiation_talk_track | array | yes | – |
| red_flags | array | yes | – |
| score_breakdown | object | – | – |
| summary | string | yes | – |
| verdict | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
compare_bids ~62
Deprecated: prefer remodeleriq_compare_bids. Compare 2–5 contractor bids side-by-side with per-trade cost comparison, scope-gap matrix, and winner recommendation.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| bids | array | yes | 2–5 contractor bids to compare side-by-side. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| _meta | object | – | – |
| all_flags | array | – | All critical and high-severity flags across every bid. |
| apples_to_apples | array | yes | Stated total + scope adjustment = adjusted comparable total per bid. |
| bid_count | number | yes | – |
| bids | array | yes | – |
| cost_comparison | array | yes | Per-trade cost table sorted by price variance (largest gap first). |
| outlier_flags | array | – | Trades where one bid is ≥2× or ≤0.5× the median. |
| scope_gaps | array | yes | Trades present in some bids but absent from others, with estimated gap value. |
| winner | object | – | – |
No examples provided.
get_cost_estimate ~145
Deprecated: prefer remodeleriq_get_cost_estimate. Get a 2026 market cost range for a home-remodeling project in a US state/city, backed by Zonda Cost vs. Value benchmarks with regional adjustment.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| city_key | string | – | Optional city slug (e.g. 'atlanta-ga') for city-level precision. |
| project_type | string | yes | Project type, e.g. 'kitchen-remodel', 'bathroom-remodel', 'roofing', 'siding', 'deck', 'addition', 'basement'. |
| state_code | string | yes | Two-letter US state code (e.g. 'CA', 'TX'). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| _meta | object | – | – |
| data_source | string | – | – |
| location | string | yes | – |
| note | string | – | – |
| project | string | yes | – |
| range_high | number | yes | – |
| range_low | number | yes | – |
| regional_multiplier | number | – | – |
| typical_cost | number | yes | – |
No examples provided.
get_labor_rates ~98
Deprecated: prefer remodeleriq_get_labor_rates. Get 2026 burdened construction trade labor rates ($/hour) for a US state, derived from BLS wage data.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| state_code | string | yes | Two-letter US state code (e.g. 'TX', 'NY'). |
| trade | string | – | Optional specific trade to filter to (e.g. 'plumber', 'electrician', 'carpenter'). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| _meta | object | – | – |
| note | string | – | – |
| rates | array | yes | – |
| state | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
get_risk_stats ~124
Deprecated: prefer remodeleriq_get_risk_stats. Get aggregate red-flag statistics from the RemodelerIQ bid corpus.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| bid_size_bucket | string | – | Bid total range to filter. Omit for all sizes. |
| project_type | string | – | Project type to filter (e.g. 'kitchen-remodel', 'bathroom-remodel', 'roofing'). Omit for all project types. |
| state_code | string | – | Two-letter US state code to filter stats (e.g. 'GA', 'TX'). Omit for national data. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| _meta | object | – | – |
| avg_bid_total | number | – | Average bid total for bids where a total was provided. |
| cell_n | number | – | Bids matching your filters. |
| confidence_score | object | – | – |
| corpus_n | number | yes | Total bids in the RemodelerIQ corpus. |
| filter | object | – | – |
| status | string | yes | – |
| suppressed | boolean | – | True when cell_n < 30 — data withheld to protect granularity. |
| top_flags | array | – | – |
No examples provided.
remodeleriq_analyze_bid ~290
Analyze a home-remodeling contractor's bid/estimate for fairness and risk. Returns a 0-100 confidence score, score_breakdown by dimension, red flags with stable flag IDs (deposit traps, vague scope, missing items, payment terms), a plain-English summary, and negotiation talk tracks. Score rubric: contract clarity 40%, scope completeness 30%, price realism 30%. Use when a homeowner asks 'is this contractor quote fair?' or shares a remodeling estimate. Note: analyses may contribute de-identified data to aggregate remodeling-risk research.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| bid_text | string | yes | The full text of the contractor's bid/estimate (line items, terms, scope). |
| bid_total | number | – | The total dollar amount of the bid, if known. |
| finish_tier | string | – | Quality tier of finishes specified in the bid. |
| scope_depth | string | – | Depth of work: cosmetic (paint/fixtures only), pull_and_replace (replace but not reconfigure), full_gut (down to studs), addition (new square footage). |
| square_footage | number | – | Project area in square feet, if known (e.g. 200 for a bathroom, 400 for a kitchen). |
| state_code | string | – | Two-letter US state code (e.g. 'TX', 'GA') for localized labor/legal context. Defaults to GA. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| _meta | object | – | – |
| confidence_score | number | yes | 0–100 bid confidence score |
| missing_items | array | yes | – |
| negotiation_talk_track | array | yes | – |
| red_flags | array | yes | – |
| score_breakdown | object | – | – |
| summary | string | yes | – |
| verdict | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
remodeleriq_compare_bids ~141
Compare 2–5 contractor bids for the same project side-by-side. Returns: per-bid confidence scores; a per-trade cost comparison table sorted by price variance; a scope-gap matrix (what Bid A includes that Bid B omits); apples-to-apples adjusted totals (normalizing for scope gaps); outlier detection (trades priced ≥2× or ≤0.5× the median); consolidated red flags across all bids; and a winner recommendation. Use when a homeowner has multiple quotes and wants to know which is best and why.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| bids | array | yes | 2–5 contractor bids to compare side-by-side. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| _meta | object | – | – |
| all_flags | array | – | All critical and high-severity flags across every bid. |
| apples_to_apples | array | yes | Stated total + scope adjustment = adjusted comparable total per bid. |
| bid_count | number | yes | – |
| bids | array | yes | – |
| cost_comparison | array | yes | Per-trade cost table sorted by price variance (largest gap first). |
| outlier_flags | array | – | Trades where one bid is ≥2× or ≤0.5× the median. |
| scope_gaps | array | yes | Trades present in some bids but absent from others, with estimated gap value. |
| winner | object | – | – |
No examples provided.
remodeleriq_get_cost_estimate ~164
Get a 2026 market cost range for a home-remodeling project in a US state/city, backed by Zonda Cost vs. Value benchmarks with regional adjustment. Use when a homeowner asks 'how much does a [kitchen/bathroom/roof/etc.] remodel cost in [place]?'
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| city_key | string | – | Optional city slug (e.g. 'atlanta-ga') for city-level precision. |
| project_type | string | yes | Project type, e.g. 'kitchen-remodel', 'bathroom-remodel', 'roofing', 'siding', 'deck', 'addition', 'basement'. |
| state_code | string | yes | Two-letter US state code (e.g. 'CA', 'TX'). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| _meta | object | – | – |
| data_source | string | – | – |
| location | string | yes | – |
| note | string | – | – |
| project | string | yes | – |
| range_high | number | yes | – |
| range_low | number | yes | – |
| regional_multiplier | number | – | – |
| typical_cost | number | yes | – |
No examples provided.
remodeleriq_get_labor_rates ~127
Get 2026 burdened construction trade labor rates ($/hour) for a US state, derived from BLS wage data. Returns rates by trade (carpenter, plumber, electrician, painter, etc.). Use when a homeowner asks what trade labor should cost or whether a bid's labor line is fair.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| state_code | string | yes | Two-letter US state code (e.g. 'TX', 'NY'). |
| trade | string | – | Optional specific trade to filter to (e.g. 'plumber', 'electrician', 'carpenter'). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| _meta | object | – | – |
| note | string | – | – |
| rates | array | yes | – |
| state | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
remodeleriq_get_risk_stats ~214
Get aggregate red-flag statistics from the RemodelerIQ bid corpus — real anonymized data from bids analyzed by the platform. Returns the most common risk flags and their fire rates, average confidence scores, and bid-total distributions, filtered optionally by US state, project type, or bid size. Requires corpus ≥ 500 submissions; cells below 30 submissions are suppressed. Use when a homeowner asks 'how common is a 40% deposit demand?' or 'what do most kitchen-remodel bids get flagged for?'. This is proprietary empirical data available nowhere else.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| bid_size_bucket | string | – | Bid total range to filter. Omit for all sizes. |
| project_type | string | – | Project type to filter (e.g. 'kitchen-remodel', 'bathroom-remodel', 'roofing'). Omit for all project types. |
| state_code | string | – | Two-letter US state code to filter stats (e.g. 'GA', 'TX'). Omit for national data. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| _meta | object | – | – |
| avg_bid_total | number | – | Average bid total for bids where a total was provided. |
| cell_n | number | – | Bids matching your filters. |
| confidence_score | object | – | – |
| corpus_n | number | yes | Total bids in the RemodelerIQ corpus. |
| filter | object | – | – |
| status | string | yes | – |
| suppressed | boolean | – | True when cell_n < 30 — data withheld to protect granularity. |
| top_flags | array | – | – |
No examples provided.
How do I install the io.github.gustavoatar/remodeleriq MCP server?
io.github.gustavoatar/remodeleriq is a hosted endpoint at https://remodeleriq.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · remodeleriq.com
claude mcp add --transport http gustavoatar-remodeleriq 'https://remodeleriq.com/mcp'
What is the io.github.gustavoatar/remodeleriq MCP server?
io.github.gustavoatar/remodeleriq is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.gustavoatar/remodeleriq. Check if a contractor's remodeling bid is fair: analyze a quote, get cost + labor estimates. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://remodeleriq.com/mcp).
Is the io.github.gustavoatar/remodeleriq MCP server safe to use?
io.github.gustavoatar/remodeleriq scores 85 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.gustavoatar/remodeleriq MCP server expose?
io.github.gustavoatar/remodeleriq exposes 10 tools: remodeleriq_analyze_bid, remodeleriq_get_cost_estimate, remodeleriq_get_labor_rates, analyze_bid, get_cost_estimate, and 5 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,603 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the io.github.gustavoatar/remodeleriq MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to io.github.gustavoatar/remodeleriq without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the io.github.gustavoatar/remodeleriq MCP server still maintained?
io.github.gustavoatar/remodeleriq is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 6 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What did VerifyMCP test on the io.github.gustavoatar/remodeleriq MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 14 checks on io.github.gustavoatar/remodeleriq, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 10 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.