TheArtOfService Compliance Intelligence
REMOTE · API.THEARTOFSERVICE.COM · SCANNED AUG 3
Query 692+ compliance frameworks, 13,700+ controls, and 280K+ cross-framework mappings.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score →
Endpoint Security57
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 10 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability77
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 1076 tokens (~107/item across 10 items; 10 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management27
- Stability observed for 8 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage88
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 64% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Add this component to your MCP client. Where a client-specific snippet is available, pick your client below and copy it straight into your config; otherwise use the connection detail shown.
remote · api.theartofservice.com
claude mcp add --transport http gjb65-compliance-intelligence https://api.theartofservice.com/mcp
[mcp_servers.gjb65-compliance-intelligence] url = "https://api.theartofservice.com/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"gjb65-compliance-intelligence": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://api.theartofservice.com/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add gjb65-compliance-intelligence --url https://api.theartofservice.com/mcp --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
gjb65-compliance-intelligence:
url: "https://api.theartofservice.com/mcp" {
"mcpServers": {
"gjb65-compliance-intelligence": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://api.theartofservice.com/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 3 Aug 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Jul 26 +1
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 30 Jul 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 29 Jul 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 28 Jul 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 27 Jul 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 26 Jul 26 62
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 3 Aug 2026 · Probed https://api.theartofservice.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=api.theartofservice.com | CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 16 Jun 2026 | 14 Sept 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 598cdced9fa9b3c2ce2d19c17a4f76e896a |
| SANs: api.theartofservice.com | ||||||
| CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of api.theartofservice.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| theartofservice.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://api.theartofservice.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://api.theartofservice.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://api.theartofservice.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability.
agent_coverage_report ~96
Get cross-framework coverage report for a framework Returns a coverage analysis showing how many controls in the given framework map to controls in every other framework. Includes total controls, mapped control counts, and coverage percentages per target framework. Use this to understand which frameworks overlap most and plan multi-framework strategies. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | string | yes | — |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
agent_cross_framework_map ~140
Map controls between two compliance frameworks Returns the complete control-to-control mapping between a source and target framework. Each mapping shows which source control maps to which target control(s). This enables multi-framework compliance: satisfy one control to cover requirements in both frameworks. Use exact framework names as returned by agent_search_frameworks. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| source | string | yes | Source framework name (e.g. 'ISO 27001:2022') |
| target | string | yes | Target framework name (e.g. 'NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0') |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
agent_get_control ~100
Get detailed information about a specific control Returns full details for a single control by its code identifier: title, description, domain, and framework. Control codes are framework-specific (e.g. 'A.5.1' for ISO 27001, 'AC-1' for NIST 800-53). ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| code | string | yes | — |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
agent_get_control_cross_references ~102
Get cross-framework mappings for a control Returns all controls in other frameworks that map to the given control via MAPS_TO relationships. This is the core cross-framework mapping capability: use it to find equivalent controls across different compliance frameworks (e.g. NIST 800-53 equivalents of ISO 27001 controls). ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| code | string | yes | — |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
agent_get_framework ~83
Get detailed information about a compliance framework Returns comprehensive details about a specific compliance framework: description, jurisdiction, version, domains with control counts, and cross-framework mapping statistics. Use the exact framework name as returned by agent_search_frameworks. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | string | yes | — |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
agent_get_framework_controls ~110
Get all controls for a compliance framework Returns all controls belonging to a framework, optionally filtered by domain. Each control includes: code, title, description, and domain. For large frameworks (e.g. NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5), use the domain filter to narrow results. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| domain | string | — | Filter controls by domain name |
| name | string | yes | — |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
agent_platform_stats ~58
Get platform statistics Returns current platform statistics: total framework count, control count, cross-framework mapping count, and domain count. No authentication required. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
agent_pricing_info ~68
Get API pricing and rate limit information Returns current API pricing tiers, monthly call limits, and (if authenticated) your current month's usage. Use this to understand costs before making API calls. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
agent_search ~157
Full-text search across controls and frameworks Search the compliance knowledge graph using full-text search. Type 'controls' searches control titles and descriptions. Type 'frameworks' searches framework names and descriptions. Use specific compliance terms for best results (e.g. 'access control', 'encryption at rest', 'data breach notification'). ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | — | Maximum results to return |
| query | string | yes | Search query (e.g. 'access control', 'encryption at rest') |
| type | string | — | Search type: 'controls' for control titles/descriptions, 'frameworks' for framework names/descriptions |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
agent_search_frameworks ~162
Search and list compliance frameworks Search the compliance knowledge graph for frameworks by name, keyword, or jurisdiction. Returns framework metadata including name, description, jurisdiction, domain count, control count, and mapping-partner count. Without a query, returns all frameworks. Use this as the starting point to discover available frameworks. ### Responses: **200**: Successful Response (Success Response) Content-Type: application/json
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| jurisdiction | string | — | Filter by jurisdiction (e.g. 'International', 'Australia', 'United States', 'European Union') |
| limit | integer | — | Maximum frameworks to return |
| q | string | — | Search query to filter by name or keyword (e.g. 'ISO 27001', 'privacy', 'Australian') |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.