Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.github.girik-chadha/interviewer-mcp

NPM · INTERVIEWER-MCP · SCANNED SEP 20

Full technical interview prep: company briefing, concepts, code deep-dive, mock interviews.

Available components

+1 this week 83 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security98
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • 31 of 96 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency48
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 64 days ago).Pass
  • Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability71
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1874 tokens (~234/item across 8 items; 8 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management93
  • Stability observed for 28 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 8 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 9 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Install

How do I install the io.github.girik-chadha/interviewer-mcp server?

io.github.girik-chadha/interviewer-mcp runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y interviewer-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · interviewer-mcp

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add girik-chadha-interviewer-mcp -- npx -y interviewer-mcp
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "girik-chadha-interviewer-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "interviewer-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "girik-chadha-interviewer-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "interviewer-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
# add to Codex CLI
codex mcp add girik-chadha-interviewer-mcp -- npx -y interviewer-mcp
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "girik-chadha-interviewer-mcp": {
      "type": "local",
      "command": [
        "npx",
        "-y",
        "interviewer-mcp"
      ],
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add girik-chadha-interviewer-mcp --command npx --arg -y --arg interviewer-mcp
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  girik-chadha-interviewer-mcp:
    command: "npx"
    args: ["-y", "interviewer-mcp"]
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "girik-chadha-interviewer-mcp": {
      "Transport": "stdio",
      "Command": "npx",
      "Arguments": [
        "-y",
        "interviewer-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
# add to Vellum
assistant mcp add girik-chadha-interviewer-mcp -t stdio -c npx -a -y interviewer-mcp
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "girik-chadha-interviewer-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "interviewer-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 20 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 18 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 17 Sept 26 −3
    • Stability: pass → 0.83 functional
  • 16 Sept 26 +1
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 14 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 12 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 10 Sept 26 −3
    • Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
  • 9 Sept 26 +1
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Analysed npm/interviewer-mcp@0.4.0

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem npm

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 96 packages
Packages resolved 96
Stale 31
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 8 exposed · ~1,070 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_code_section ~115

Fetch the actual code for one section, plus its file context (imports at the top of the file). Use during TEACH mode to walk the user through their code one section at a time, and during INTERVIEW mode to ground questions in the real code. After the user demonstrates understanding of a section in teach mode, call mark_covered — this tool does not mark automatically.

NameTypeReqDescription
repostringyesRepo id in owner/repo form
section_idstringyesSection id from list_sections or ingest_repo

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_interview_targets ~149

Get the most probe-worthy parts of the repo for a mock interview: external API calls, auth/secrets handling, raw SQL, concurrency, long uncommented functions, leftover TODOs — plus any sections the user previously performed poorly on (weakness_score > 0 comes first). Call this at the START of every interview session and build questions from the returned reasons. Use focus='weak_spots' on returning users to re-attack past struggles.

NameTypeReqDescription
focusstringall (default): every target. weak_spots: only sections with prior weak performance. design_decisions: only heuristic-detected probe points.
repostringyesRepo id in owner/repo form

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_progress ~100

Get the user's full learning state for a repo: coverage %, session history, top weaknesses with notes, and recent interview performance. Call this FIRST at the start of any returning session ('let's continue', 'test me again', 'where were we') so you can resume from weak spots instead of starting over. Also call it to generate the strengths/weaknesses summary after an interview.

NameTypeReqDescription
repostringyesRepo id in owner/repo form

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

ingest_repo ~155

Fetch and index a GitHub repository so it can be taught and interviewed. Call this FIRST whenever the user provides a repo URL or asks to prep a repo that has not been ingested yet. Builds a code map (sections in a suggested teaching order) and caches file contents locally. Returns the repo summary and the first few sections — NOT full code; use get_code_section to pull code. Safe to call again on the same repo: it refreshes the code while preserving the user's progress and weakness history.

NameTypeReqDescription
branchstringBranch to ingest; defaults to the repo's default branch
repo_urlstringyesGitHub repo URL (https://github.com/owner/repo) or shorthand owner/repo

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_sections ~96

List all sections of an ingested repo in the suggested teaching order, with covered status and weakness scores. Use this to decide what to teach next (first uncovered section) or what to re-attack in an interview (highest weakness_score). Returns metadata only, never code — keep context small and pull code per-section with get_code_section.

NameTypeReqDescription
repostringyesRepo id in owner/repo form, as returned by ingest_repo

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

log_interview_result ~179

Record one interview question and how the user performed. Call this after EVERY question-answer exchange in a mock interview — this is what powers cross-session memory of weaknesses. performance: 'strong' (clear, correct, justified), 'okay' (mostly right, some gaps), 'weak' (couldn't explain or wrong). Include the specific gap in notes when performance is weak or okay, e.g. 'could not explain why JWT is verified server-side'.

NameTypeReqDescription
notesstringSpecific gap or strength observed; be concrete
performancestringyesHow the user performed on this question
questionstringyesThe interview question that was asked
repostringyesRepo id in owner/repo form
section_idstringSection this question targeted, if any — weak performance raises its weakness_score

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

mark_covered ~78

Mark a section as covered in teach mode. Call this ONLY after the user has explained the section back in their own words or answered a comprehension question about it correctly — not merely after showing them the code.

NameTypeReqDescription
repostringyesRepo id in owner/repo form
section_idstringyesSection id to mark as covered

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

set_job_description ~198

Store the prep context: job description, and optionally company name and CV text, tied to a repo. Call this when the user pastes or describes any of them. Once set, use it throughout: in teach mode, point out where the code demonstrates JD-required skills; in interview mode, probe JD-required concepts the repo does NOT demonstrate (e.g. 'the JD requires Docker and your repo has no containerization — how would you containerize this app?'). The JD is returned by get_progress so returning sessions stay JD-aware.

NameTypeReqDescription
companystringCompany name, for company-specific briefing and question style
cv_textstringThe candidate's CV/resume text — every claimed skill becomes bootcamp + interview material
job_descriptionstringyesThe full job description text, or the user's summary of the role
repostringyesRepo id in owner/repo form this JD applies to

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the io.github.girik-chadha/interviewer-mcp server?

io.github.girik-chadha/interviewer-mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.girik-chadha/interviewer-mcp. Full technical interview prep: company briefing, concepts, code deep-dive, mock interviews. This page covers its npm package (interviewer-mcp).

Is the io.github.girik-chadha/interviewer-mcp server safe to use?

io.github.girik-chadha/interviewer-mcp scores 83 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 20 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the io.github.girik-chadha/interviewer-mcp server expose?

io.github.girik-chadha/interviewer-mcp exposes 8 tools: ingest_repo, list_sections, get_code_section, mark_covered, get_interview_targets, and 3 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,070 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the io.github.girik-chadha/interviewer-mcp server still maintained?

io.github.girik-chadha/interviewer-mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the io.github.girik-chadha/interviewer-mcp server under?

io.github.girik-chadha/interviewer-mcp declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.