Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.github.GiovannaFilippini/gazzetta-mcp

PYPI · GAZZETTA-MCP

Free, local MCP server to consult and search the Italian Gazzetta Ufficiale. Unofficial.

Available components

+4 this week 86 Trust /100

Last scanned (23 hours ago)

Scores higher than 89% of PyPI servers

Category Education and Research

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security100
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • Runs hatchling.build at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
  • 1 of 23 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency100
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to GiovannaFilippini/gazzetta-mcp). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 6 days ago).Pass
  • Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability58
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 2106 tokens (~351/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management67
  • Stability observed for 20 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage71
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (16)

  • Malware scan
  • Known CVEs
  • Install scripts
  • Dependency health
  • Source repository
  • Provenance
  • License
  • Maintenance
  • Security disclosure
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Does not apply to this package (2)

  • Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
  • Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +15
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed pypi/gazzetta-mcp@0.1.0

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem pypi
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo GiovannaFilippini/gazzetta-mcp
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/GiovannaFilippini/gazzetta-mcp/.github/workflows/release.yml@refs/heads/main
Rekor log index 3281243613
Predicate type PyPI publish attestation https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1
Subject digest sha256:a86bedcbb45ec3f7e46015e9c799d7c8bf112c800b13bf4e8a7f9b57d9153604

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Install scripts 1 script
Hook Tier Command
build_backend Known build tool hatchling.build

Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →

Dependencies 23 packages
Packages resolved 23
Stale 1
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 6 exposed · ~1,703 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
cerca ~527

Cerca per parole chiave tra gli atti della Gazzetta Ufficiale, anche a cache vuota. Usalo quando l'utente descrive un argomento senza codici: "decreti sul bonus edilizia", "atti che parlano di semplificazione", "qualcosa sulla caccia in Veneto". Mette i risultati in ordine di pertinenza; da un risultato prendi il codice per leggi_atto. Con aggiorna=true (predefinito) e serie SG, S4 o non indicata, scarica prima, con poche richieste distanziate, i sommari dei numeri recenti (SG: ultimi 24, circa 30 giorni; S4: ultimi 9) non ancora in cache. Si cerca nei titoli e negli enti (singolare e plurale sono equivalenti; se nessun titolo ha tutte le parole, ripiega su quelli che ne hanno almeno una), NON nel testo completo. In piu' interroga l'archivio degli atti normativi su Normattiva (leggi e decreti per titolo; senza dal copre l'ultimo anno; con solo_vigenti=true, predefinito, esclude gli atti gia' abrogati): quei risultati hanno origine 'normattiva' e per leggerli con leggi_atto va passata anche la data. La risposta dice quali date e quali archivi sono stati usati: la copertura puo' restare parziale (avvisi e concorsi vecchi non ci sono), dillo all'utente. Con periodo='anno' la cache locale della Serie Generale viene estesa all'indietro, 24 numeri per chiamata, fino a un anno (anche per atti non normativi): la risposta dice a che punto e', ripeti la ricerca per proseguire. Con aggiorna=false non si fa rete. Filtri facoltativi: serie (SG, S1-S5, P2), tipo (es. DECRETO, LEGGE, AVVISO), dal / al (AAAA-MM-GG), limite (massimo 100).

NameTypeReqDescription
aggiornaboolean––
al–––
dal–––
limiteinteger––
periodo–––
serie–––
solo_vigentiboolean––
testostringyes–
tipo–––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

cerca_concorsi ~367

Cerca bandi di concorso pubblico (4a Serie Speciale, Concorsi ed esami). Usalo per richieste come "concorsi per infermiere in Lombardia", "bandi per istruttore amministrativo", "ci sono concorsi per insegnanti in Toscana". Basta qualche parola chiave (profilo, ente, citta') e, se l'utente la nomina, la regione. Non chiedere date o codici. Al primo uso scarica, con poche richieste distanziate, i sommari dei numeri degli ultimi 30 giorni (tipicamente 8-9) e li tiene in cache. Cerca nel titolo e nell'ente di ogni atto, non nel testo del bando: ogni risposta dichiara i numeri esaminati, quindi i risultati possono essere parziali; dillo all'utente. La regione e' stimata dal nome dell'ente; gli atti di regione non determinata sono contati a parte. aperti: solo numeri degli ultimi 30 giorni (i bandi sono di norma ancora aperti); con false si aggiungono i numeri piu' vecchi gia' in cache. includi_altri_atti: aggiunge diari delle prove, graduatorie, rettifiche, commissioni. limite: massimo di risultati (fino a 100). Il bando completo va letto sul sito ufficiale (link in ogni risultato) o con leggi_atto.

NameTypeReqDescription
apertiboolean––
includi_altri_attiboolean––
limiteinteger––
parole_chiavestringyes–
regione–––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

leggi_atto ~259

Legge il testo di un atto della Gazzetta Ufficiale, ripulito per la lettura. Usalo quando l'utente vuole il testo di un atto: "dammi il testo del decreto X", "riassumimi questo decreto", "cosa dice l'atto 26A05182". Il codice (es. 26A05182) lo trovi nei risultati di ultime_pubblicazioni, sommario, cerca o cerca_concorsi: non chiederlo all'utente. La data e la serie di solito NON servono: vengono ricordate dai risultati gia' visti o cercate tra le ultime pubblicazioni. Se l'atto non e' recente e non e' mai comparso in un risultato, cercalo prima con cerca o ultime_pubblicazioni. I testi lunghi sono divisi in pagine: per continuare richiama con offset uguale al 'prossimo_offset' del risultato precedente. Il testo non e' ufficiale: cita sempre il link nel campo 'link'.

NameTypeReqDescription
codicestringyes–
data–––
offsetinteger––
serie–––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

rimando_normattiva ~150

Costruisce il link a Normattiva (testo vigente) di una legge o di un decreto. Usalo per richieste come "link Normattiva della legge 241/1990", "dove leggo il testo aggiornato del DL 144/2026". Restituisce solo il link: nessun testo viene scaricato. atto: gli estremi in parole, ad esempio 'legge 5 agosto 2026, n. 140', 'DL 144/2026', 'DPR 26 ottobre 1972 n. 633' oppure un codice di un atto gia' trovato.

NameTypeReqDescription
attostringyes–

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

sommario ~167

Elenco completo degli atti di un numero della Gazzetta Ufficiale di un certo giorno. Usalo quando l'utente indica un giorno: "cosa e' uscito il 2 ottobre", "sommario della Gazzetta del 15 settembre". Se l'utente non indica un giorno usa invece ultime_pubblicazioni. Restituisce codice, titolo, emettitore e link di ogni atto, piu' il link al numero e al PDF. data: giorno di pubblicazione, formato AAAA-MM-GG (converti tu le date dette a parole). serie: SG (predefinita), S1-S5, P2.

NameTypeReqDescription
datastringyes–
seriestring––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

ultime_pubblicazioni ~233

Elenca le ultime cose uscite in Gazzetta Ufficiale (feed ufficiale). Usalo quando l'utente chiede le novita': "cosa e' uscito oggi in Gazzetta", "ci sono nuovi decreti questa settimana", "ultimi concorsi pubblicati". Non servono date o codici. Ogni voce ha un codice (es. 26A05182) che poi basta passare a leggi_atto. Copertura parziale: il feed contiene solo i numeri piu' recenti; per giorni piu' lontani usa sommario o cerca. serie: SG (Serie Generale, la piu' comune), S1 (Corte Costituzionale), S2 (Unione Europea), S3 (Regioni), S4 (Concorsi ed esami), S5 (Contratti pubblici), P2 (Parte II). giorni: quanti giorni indietro includere (1-90).

NameTypeReqDescription
giorniinteger––
seriestring––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the io.github.GiovannaFilippini/gazzetta-mcp server?

io.github.GiovannaFilippini/gazzetta-mcp runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx gazzetta-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

pypi · gazzetta-mcp

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add giovannafilippini-gazzetta-mcp -- uvx gazzetta-mcp
Common questions

What is the io.github.GiovannaFilippini/gazzetta-mcp server?

io.github.GiovannaFilippini/gazzetta-mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.GiovannaFilippini/gazzetta-mcp. Free, local MCP server to consult and search the Italian Gazzetta Ufficiale. Unofficial. This page covers its PyPI package (gazzetta-mcp).

Is the io.github.GiovannaFilippini/gazzetta-mcp server safe to use?

io.github.GiovannaFilippini/gazzetta-mcp scores 86 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 5 November 2026. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the io.github.GiovannaFilippini/gazzetta-mcp server expose?

io.github.GiovannaFilippini/gazzetta-mcp exposes 6 tools: ultime_pubblicazioni, sommario, leggi_atto, cerca_concorsi, rimando_normattiva, cerca. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,703 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the io.github.GiovannaFilippini/gazzetta-mcp server still maintained?

io.github.GiovannaFilippini/gazzetta-mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the io.github.GiovannaFilippini/gazzetta-mcp server under?

io.github.GiovannaFilippini/gazzetta-mcp declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.

What did VerifyMCP test on the io.github.GiovannaFilippini/gazzetta-mcp server?

VerifyMCP ran 16 checks on io.github.GiovannaFilippini/gazzetta-mcp, covering Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health and 12 more. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to a PyPI package, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.