var.gg Naming Memory
REMOTE · VAR.GG · 2 COMPONENTS
Curated multilingual dictionary that names code identifiers from domain concepts (KO/JA/ZH/VI/EN).
Available components
Last scanned (7 hours ago)
Scores higher than 55% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Databases
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security57
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 7 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability64
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 423 tokens (~60/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage67
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities20
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2024-11-05; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 28 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 26 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Aug 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 11 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 31 Jul 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 30 Jul 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 27 Jul 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://var.gg/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=var.gg | CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 6 Oct 2026 | 4 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 64f0de10d8169146114e67e610de5179448 |
| SANs: *.var.gg, var.gg | ||||||
| CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of var.gg. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| gg. | present | 4975 | 8 | Verified |
| var.gg. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://var.gg/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://var.gg/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://var.gg/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
erd.get_changes ~55
다이어그램 change_events 목록 (proposed_state 필터 가능).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| actor_type | string | – | – |
| diagram_id | string | yes | – |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| proposed_state | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
erd.get_schema ~33
다이어그램 전체 (tables + columns + relationships + enums) snapshot.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| diagram_id | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
erd.get_table ~36
특정 테이블 1개 (columns 포함).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| diagram_id | string | yes | – |
| table_name | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
erd.list_diagrams ~78
ERD 다이어그램 목록. anonymous 면 project_group_id 명시 필수 + group.is_public=true 만 통과. user-scope token 도 project_group_id 명시 권장. project-scope token 은 token 의 group 이 default.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| include_archived | boolean | – | – |
| project_group_id | integer | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
erd.search_tables ~52
group 안 모든 다이어그램에서 table_name keyword 검색. anonymous 면 project_group_id 명시 + group.is_public 통과.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| keyword | string | – | – |
| project_group_id | integer | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
vargg.search_terms ~70
변수명 검색 — query + scopes (project/public/global) 기준 매칭.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
| locale | string | – | – |
| projectId | integer | – | – |
| query | string | yes | – |
| scopes | array | – | – |
| searchBy | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
vargg.suggest_name ~99
변수명 추천 — concept 받아 canonical / public / global 검색 + best-effort 후보.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| abbreviationsAllowed | boolean | – | – |
| codeLanguage | string | – | – |
| concept | string | yes | – |
| context | string | – | – |
| desiredCase | string | – | – |
| entityType | string | – | – |
| locale | string | – | – |
| maxResults | integer | – | – |
| projectId | integer | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the var.gg Naming Memory MCP server?
var.gg Naming Memory is a hosted endpoint at https://var.gg/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · var.gg
claude mcp add --transport http gg-var-naming-memory 'https://var.gg/mcp'
What is the var.gg Naming Memory MCP server?
var.gg Naming Memory is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as gg.var/naming-memory. Curated multilingual dictionary that names code identifiers from domain concepts (KO/JA/ZH/VI/EN). This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://var.gg/mcp).
Is the var.gg Naming Memory MCP server safe to use?
var.gg Naming Memory scores 70 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the var.gg Naming Memory MCP server expose?
var.gg Naming Memory exposes 7 tools: vargg.suggest_name, vargg.search_terms, erd.list_diagrams, erd.get_schema, erd.get_table, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 423 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the var.gg Naming Memory MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to var.gg Naming Memory without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the var.gg Naming Memory MCP server still maintained?
var.gg Naming Memory is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.