io.github.gabrielmahia/sifa-mcp
PYPI · SIFA-MCP · SCANNED SEP 20
⭐ sifa-mcp — Portable Reputation & Skills Passport MCP Server
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security50
- Malware scan not yet available for this package.Unverified
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- Runs setuptools.build_meta at install time, a recognised native-build step with no shell scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
- 1 of 15 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency48
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 63 days ago).Pass
- Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability78
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 718 tokens (~119/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management87
- Stability observed for 26 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
How do I install the io.github.gabrielmahia/sifa-mcp server?
io.github.gabrielmahia/sifa-mcp runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx sifa-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
pypi · sifa-mcp
claude mcp add gabrielmahia-sifa-mcp -- uvx sifa-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"gabrielmahia-sifa-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"sifa-mcp"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"gabrielmahia-sifa-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"sifa-mcp"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add gabrielmahia-sifa-mcp -- uvx sifa-mcp
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"gabrielmahia-sifa-mcp": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"uvx",
"sifa-mcp"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add gabrielmahia-sifa-mcp --command uvx --arg sifa-mcp
mcp_servers:
gabrielmahia-sifa-mcp:
command: "uvx"
args: ["sifa-mcp"] {
"McpServers": {
"gabrielmahia-sifa-mcp": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "uvx",
"Arguments": [
"sifa-mcp"
]
}
}
} assistant mcp add gabrielmahia-sifa-mcp -t stdio -c uvx -a sifa-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"gabrielmahia-sifa-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"sifa-mcp"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 20 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 19 Sept 26 −3
- Stability: pass → 0.83 functional
- 18 Sept 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 17 Sept 26 −15
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- 16 Sept 26 +16
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 15 Sept 26 −15
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- 14 Sept 26 +16
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 12 Sept 26 −3
- Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Analysed pypi/sifa-mcp@0.1.4
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | pypi |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Install scripts 1 script
| Hook | Tier | Command |
|---|---|---|
| build_backend | allowlisted | setuptools.build_meta |
Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →
Dependencies 15 packages
| Packages resolved | 15 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 1 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
add_service_record Add Service Record ~175
Add a completed service record to a worker's profile. Western parallel: Uber trip completion, Angie's List job review, Upwork completed contract. Each record builds the reputation score. DEMO — client verification is simulated.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| client_name | string | yes | Client name (or business name) |
| client_phone | string | yes | Client M-PESA number (for verification anchor) |
| client_rating | integer | yes | Client rating 1-5 stars |
| duration_days | integer | yes | Duration of the job in days |
| notes | string | – | Brief description of work done |
| payment_kes | integer | yes | Amount paid in KES (0 if unpaid/pro bono) |
| profile_id | string | yes | Worker profile ID (SFA-XXXXXXXXXXXX format) |
| service_type | string | yes | Type of service performed |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
compare_workers Compare Workers ~70
Compare the reputation scores of multiple workers for a specific job. Western parallel: Contractor comparison on Thumbtack, Bark, or Houzz. DEMO data.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| profile_ids | string | yes | Comma-separated list of profile IDs to compare |
| required_skill | string | – | Skill required for the job |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
create_worker_profile Create Worker Profile ~190
Create a portable worker reputation profile. Western parallel: LinkedIn profile creation, Angie's List contractor profile. This is the 'economic passport' that travels with the worker. DEMO — no real identity verification in this prototype.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| full_name | string | yes | Worker's full name |
| languages | string | – | Languages spoken (e.g., 'Swahili,English,Kikuyu') |
| location | string | yes | Current base location (town or county) |
| phone | string | yes | M-PESA phone number (used as identity anchor, not stored in plain text) |
| primary_skill | string | yes | Primary skill category (see skill_categories tool) |
| sub_skills | string | yes | Comma-separated list of specific skills (e.g., 'masonry,tiling,plastering') |
| years_experience | integer | yes | Years of experience in primary skill (0-40) |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
generate_reference Generate Reference ~91
Generate a structured professional reference letter for a worker. Western parallel: LinkedIn recommendation, employer reference letter. Outputs a formatted reference that can be printed, shared as PDF, or verified by QR code in production. DEMO.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| profile_id | string | yes | Worker profile ID |
| reference_purpose | string | – | Purpose: job_application, loan_application, tenancy, SACCO_membership, NGO_programme |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
get_reputation_profile Get Reputation Profile ~74
Retrieve a worker's full reputation profile including trust score. Western parallel: Checking a contractor's BBB rating or Upwork JSS. DEMO data.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| profile_id | string | yes | Worker profile ID to retrieve |
| requester_context | string | – | Who is requesting (employer, SACCO, bank, NGO) |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
list_skill_categories List Skill Categories ~35
List all skill categories and subcategories available in the Sifa system. Use this to see valid skill values for create_worker_profile.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
What is the io.github.gabrielmahia/sifa-mcp server?
io.github.gabrielmahia/sifa-mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.gabrielmahia/sifa-mcp. ⭐ sifa-mcp, Portable Reputation & Skills Passport MCP Server. This page covers its PyPI package (sifa-mcp).
Is the io.github.gabrielmahia/sifa-mcp server safe to use?
io.github.gabrielmahia/sifa-mcp scores 69 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 20 September 2026. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.gabrielmahia/sifa-mcp server expose?
io.github.gabrielmahia/sifa-mcp exposes 6 tools: create_worker_profile, add_service_record, get_reputation_profile, generate_reference, list_skill_categories, compare_workers. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 635 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the io.github.gabrielmahia/sifa-mcp server still maintained?
io.github.gabrielmahia/sifa-mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the io.github.gabrielmahia/sifa-mcp server under?
io.github.gabrielmahia/sifa-mcp declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.