ScanScam Integrity
REMOTE · WWW.SCANSCAM.CA · SCANNED SEP 20
Independent agent preflight: verify change, mandates, evidence, and exact execution.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability74
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 261 tokens (~130/item across 2 items; 2 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management33
- Stability observed for 10 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage83
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 50% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 2 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
How do I install the ScanScam Integrity MCP server?
ScanScam Integrity is a hosted endpoint at https://www.scanscam.ca/api/integrity/v1/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · www.scanscam.ca
claude mcp add --transport http gabothefounder-scanscam-integrity 'https://www.scanscam.ca/api/integrity/v1/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"gabothefounder-scanscam-integrity": {
"url": "https://www.scanscam.ca/api/integrity/v1/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"gabothefounder-scanscam-integrity": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://www.scanscam.ca/api/integrity/v1/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.gabothefounder-scanscam-integrity] url = "https://www.scanscam.ca/api/integrity/v1/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"gabothefounder-scanscam-integrity": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://www.scanscam.ca/api/integrity/v1/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add gabothefounder-scanscam-integrity --url 'https://www.scanscam.ca/api/integrity/v1/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
gabothefounder-scanscam-integrity:
url: "https://www.scanscam.ca/api/integrity/v1/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"gabothefounder-scanscam-integrity": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://www.scanscam.ca/api/integrity/v1/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add gabothefounder-scanscam-integrity -t streamable-http -u 'https://www.scanscam.ca/api/integrity/v1/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"gabothefounder-scanscam-integrity": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://www.scanscam.ca/api/integrity/v1/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 20 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 16 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 14 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 12 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 11 Sept 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 10 Sept 26 +36
- Transport: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Authorization: fail → partial ▲ security
- First check of Judged manipulation: pass security
- MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- First check of Tool coverage: 50 functional
- First check of Schema quality: fail functional
- First check of Destructive annotations: pass functional
- First check of Schema quality: pass functional
- First check of Schema quality: good functional
- 9 Sept 26 36
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Probed https://www.scanscam.ca/api/integrity/v1/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=www.scanscam.ca | CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 22 Aug 2026 | 20 Nov 2026 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 570ec80c07f874574bc1ae326d0560070a7 |
| SANs: www.scanscam.ca | ||||||
| CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of www.scanscam.ca. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| ca. | present | 26384 | 13 | Verified |
| scanscam.ca. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://www.scanscam.ca/api/integrity/v1/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://www.scanscam.ca/api/integrity/v1/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://www.scanscam.ca/api/integrity/v1/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
integrity_discover Discover ScanScam Integrity ~42
Public, no-auth storefront for agents. Returns what ScanScam Integrity can verify, the commercial model, and how to express demand. Do not send transaction data.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
integrity_request_service Request an independent agent service ~122
Tell ScanScam what kind of independent service your agent needs, using categories only. This is a demand/fit signal, not a transaction submission.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| agent_name | string | – | Optional agent/client product name only; no person names, IDs, secrets, or transaction data. |
| budget_per_check | string | – | – |
| desired_outcome | string | yes | What result would make the service useful. |
| need | string | yes | Category of service needed. Never include transaction contents. |
| urgency | string | – | – |
| willingness_to_pay | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the ScanScam Integrity MCP server?
ScanScam Integrity is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.Gabothefounder/scanscam-integrity. Independent agent preflight: verify change, mandates, evidence, and exact execution. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.scanscam.ca/api/integrity/v1/mcp).
Is the ScanScam Integrity MCP server safe to use?
ScanScam Integrity scores 77 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the ScanScam Integrity MCP server expose?
ScanScam Integrity exposes 2 tools: integrity_discover, integrity_request_service. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 164 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the ScanScam Integrity MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to ScanScam Integrity without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the ScanScam Integrity MCP server still maintained?
ScanScam Integrity is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.