Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Suxession — French Inheritance Tax Engine

REMOTE · SUXESSION.FR

French inheritance tax engine: simulate, compare scenarios, savings estimate, premium optimizer.

Available components

+3 this week 81 Trust /100

Last scanned (2 hours ago)

Scores higher than 86% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 25 Oct 2026.

Category Finance and Payments

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security77
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability62
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 812 tokens (~162/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management87
  • Stability observed for 26 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage86
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 50% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 0
    • Server version: 0.6.2.0 → 0.6.2.2 functional
  • 22 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 20 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 18 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 16 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 14 Oct 26 +1
    • Server version: 0.6.1.3 → 0.6.2.0 functional
  • 13 Oct 26 0
    • Server version: 0.6.1.2 → 0.6.1.3 functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 25 Oct 2026 · Probed https://suxession.fr/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=suxession.fr CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 2 Oct 2026 31 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 6fae8b6e54ca72033ca0a58be72f1947237
SANs: suxession.fr
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC secure

Validation of suxession.fr. — Secure

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
fr. present 65381 13 Verified
suxession.fr. present 8302 8 Verified
suxession.fr. Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
content-security-policy default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://cdn.jsdelivr.net https://eu-assets.i.posthog.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com; font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com; img-src 'self' data:; connect-src 'self' https://*.supabase.co https://eu.i.posthog.com
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options DENY
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://suxession.fr/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://suxession.fr/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://suxession.fr/mcp
MCP tools · 5 exposed · ~491 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
comparer_scenarios ~74

Compare 1 à 5 scénarios de transmission (ex. usufruit total vs quart en pleine propriété), second décès inclus si conjoint. Gratuit. La projection « donation vs succession » (transmission de son vivant) est une analyse premium, hors de ce périmètre gratuit.

NameTypeReqDescription
scenariosarrayyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

deverrouiller_acces ~50

Active l'accès premium à partir du code d'accès reçu après paiement (affiché sur la page de confirmation). Le code est transmis tel quel, sans modification.

NameTypeReqDescription
codestringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

estimer_economie_optimisation ~137

Estime le montant EXACT de l'économie potentielle via les 25 leviers d'optimisation (gratuit, même calcul que le site). Les leviers individuels ne sont jamais nommés ni chiffrés dans la réponse ; prix (99 €, paiement unique) et lien de paiement inclus. Les leviers détaillés sont révélés par explorer_optimisations après achat.

NameTypeReqDescription
situationobjectyesSous-ensemble fiable du CalculRequest web (~30 sous-schemas → 8 champs). Cas simple uniquement : assurance-vie, donations, démembrement, SCI… → renvoi wizard.
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

explorer_optimisations ~130

Résultats de l'optimiseur complet (premium, accès 99 €) : nécessite un accès actif déverrouillé via deverrouiller_acces. Retourne les stratégies d'optimisation complètes : leviers, montants, articles CGI, avertissements. La mise en place se finalise avec un notaire.

NameTypeReqDescription
codestringyes–
situationobjectyesSous-ensemble fiable du CalculRequest web (~30 sous-schemas → 8 champs). Cas simple uniquement : assurance-vie, donations, démembrement, SCI… → renvoi wizard.
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

simuler_droits_succession ~100

Calcule les droits de succession français (cas simple) : patrimoine, conjoint, enfants, régime matrimonial. Réponse : droits par héritier + articles CGI de référence + liens guide. Gratuit, sans compte.

NameTypeReqDescription
situationobjectyesSous-ensemble fiable du CalculRequest web (~30 sous-schemas → 8 champs). Cas simple uniquement : assurance-vie, donations, démembrement, SCI… → renvoi wizard.
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Suxession — French Inheritance Tax Engine MCP server?

Suxession — French Inheritance Tax Engine is a hosted endpoint at https://suxession.fr/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · suxession.fr

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http fr-suxession-suxession 'https://suxession.fr/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Suxession — French Inheritance Tax Engine MCP server?

Suxession — French Inheritance Tax Engine is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as fr.suxession/suxession. French inheritance tax engine: simulate, compare scenarios, savings estimate, premium optimizer. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://suxession.fr/mcp).

Is the Suxession — French Inheritance Tax Engine MCP server safe to use?

Suxession — French Inheritance Tax Engine scores 81 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Suxession — French Inheritance Tax Engine MCP server expose?

Suxession — French Inheritance Tax Engine exposes 5 tools: simuler_droits_succession, comparer_scenarios, estimer_economie_optimisation, deverrouiller_acces, explorer_optimisations. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 491 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Suxession — French Inheritance Tax Engine MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Suxession — French Inheritance Tax Engine without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Suxession — French Inheritance Tax Engine MCP server still maintained?

Suxession — French Inheritance Tax Engine is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 25 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.