Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, email [email protected] and we’ll put it right.

OhMyWind

REMOTE · MCP.OHMYWIND.FR · SCANNED AUG 3

Sailing passage planner for any coast, with high-precision tides on the French Atlantic.

Available components

55 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (6 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score →

Endpoint Security46
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability68
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 2350 tokens (~470/item across 5 items; 4 tools + 1 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management7
  • Stability observed for 2 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage71
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
  • Supports UI / widget rendering.Pass
Install

Add this component to your MCP client. Where a client-specific snippet is available, pick your client below and copy it straight into your config; otherwise use the connection detail shown.

remote · mcp.ohmywind.fr

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http fr-ohmywind-sailing-planner https://mcp.ohmywind.fr/mcp
# ~/.codex/config.toml
[mcp_servers.fr-ohmywind-sailing-planner]
url = "https://mcp.ohmywind.fr/mcp"
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "fr-ohmywind-sailing-planner": {
      "type": "remote",
      "url": "https://mcp.ohmywind.fr/mcp",
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add fr-ohmywind-sailing-planner --url https://mcp.ohmywind.fr/mcp --transport streamable-http
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  fr-ohmywind-sailing-planner:
    url: "https://mcp.ohmywind.fr/mcp"
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "fr-ohmywind-sailing-planner": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://mcp.ohmywind.fr/mcp"
    }
  }
}

The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 2 Aug 26 +1
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 functional
  • 1 Aug 26 54

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 3 Aug 2026 · Probed https://mcp.ohmywind.fr/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=ohmywind.fr CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 8 Jul 2026 6 Oct 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 3c7a090e58de3fd00e874816c92e9a15
SANs: ohmywind.fr, *.ohmywind.fr
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b
DNSSEC insecure

Validation of mcp.ohmywind.fr. Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
fr. present 65381 13 Verified
ohmywind.fr. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
content-security-policy frame-ancestors 'self' https://huggingface.co https://*.hf.space
x-content-type-options nosniff
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://mcp.ohmywind.fr/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://mcp.ohmywind.fr/mcp Inconclusive 406
MCP tools — 4 exposed · ~2,222 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability.

Tool Tokens
get_marine_forecast ~157

Fetch wind (and sea, when available) for a point and time window. Args: lat: latitude in degrees. lon: longitude in degrees. start: ISO-8601 datetime, timezone-aware (e.g. "2026-05-01T06:00:00+00:00"). end: ISO-8601 datetime, timezone-aware. models: optional list of model names; defaults to AROME for the Med. Note: the first request after inactivity may incur ~5s of cold-start.

NameTypeReqDescription
endstringyes
latnumberyes
lonnumberyes
models
startstringyes

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

list_boat_archetypes ~65

List the 7 boat archetypes with descriptive metadata. The LLM (or user) maps a commercial model (e.g. "Sun Odyssey 32") to one of these archetypes from the metadata — there is no server-side mapping.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
resultarrayyes

No examples provided.

plan_passage ~1,871

Plan an A→B passage. Compare departure windows by default; pin a single departure only when the user gives an explicit time. ## Tool routing — read this first Before calling, classify the user's question: 1. **Pure weather lookup at a point** ("y aura-t-il du vent à Cassis samedi à 14h ?", "quelles vagues dimanche au cap Sicié ?") — call ``get_marine_forecast`` and answer in text. Do NOT call ``plan_passage``: there's no route to plan. 2. **Trajet question with a flexible date** ("Marseille → Porquerolles ce week-end", "demain ou après-demain", "dans les prochains jours") — call ``plan_passage`` in **compare-windows mode**: pass ``latest_departure`` (e.g. earliest+48h) and ``sweep_interval_hours`` (3 or 6 typically) so the user sees several departure scenarios side-by-side. Then pick 2-3 good ones and let the user choose. This is the **default** for trajet planning — same API cost as a single passage thanks to cache prewarm, much more value. 3. **Trajet with a precise hour pinned by the user** ("je pars demain à 8h", "départ Saturday 9am") — call ``plan_passage`` in single mode (no ``latest_departure``). Used for the final "show me the detailed plan for THIS departure" view, often after step 2. 4. **Methodology question** ("comment c'est calculé ?", "quelle efficacité par défaut ?") — call ``read_me``. Rule of thumb: if the user does NOT give an exact hour, prefer compare-windows. The widget renders one of the windows by default and the chat lets the user pick another. ## Returned payload Single mode: - ``passage``: per-segment timing report (distance_nm, duration_h, model used, segments[] with TWS/TWA/boat_speed/Hs, warnings). - ``complexity``: 1-5 difficulty score with wind/sea brea…

NameTypeReqDescription
archetypestringyes
departurestringyes
efficiencynumber
latest_departure
max_hs_m
modelstring
motor_speed_kn
motor_threshold_kn
segment_length_nmnumber
sweep_interval_hoursinteger
target_eta
waypointsarrayyes

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

read_me ~129

Return OhMyWind's calculation methodology as Markdown. Call this when the user asks how passage timing, complexity, or boat speed are computed (e.g. "comment c'est calculé ?", "what assumptions does the model use?", "is tacking modelled?"). The returned text covers: polar lookup, default efficiency 0.75, VMG / tacking correction, wave derate, single-pass timing, compare-windows mode semantics, Mediterranean simplifications (tides, currents), and what is intentionally NOT modelled in V1.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes

No examples provided.