HumanMirror One
REMOTE · HUMANMIRROR.FR
Agent routing, safety preflight, execution receipts, best execution and verified outcomes.
Available components
Last scanned (18 hours ago)
Scores higher than 73% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 6 Nov 2026.
Category Security
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security66
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 1 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root. View diagnostics → Pass
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability51
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 355 tokens (~355/item across 1 items; 1 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 1 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 2 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Checks we ran (12)
- TLS certificate
- HTTPS
- HSTS header
- DNSSEC
- Transport
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Checks we could not complete (1)
These are gaps on our side, not findings about this hosted endpoint. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.
- Authorization in Endpoint SecurityAuthorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 1 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe.
Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)
- Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
- Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 6 Nov 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 11 Oct 26 −1
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Tool “humanmirror_do” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Server version: 1.0.1 → 1.0.2 functional
- 30 Sept 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 28 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 26 Sept 26 0
- Server version: 1.0.0 → 1.0.1 functional
- 25 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 24 Sept 26 0
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- 20 Sept 26 0
- MCP protocol: fail → pass ▲ functional
- MCP protocol version: 2025-06-18 → 2026-07-28 functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 6 Nov 2026 · Probed https://humanmirror.fr/api/one/mcp/
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=humanmirror.fr | CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 23 Oct 2026 | 21 Jan 2027 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 5d212d21cfa696bb4e0696a84caa36bc908 |
| SANs: humanmirror.fr | ||||||
| CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC secure
Validation of humanmirror.fr. — Secure
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Trust anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| fr. | DS published | 65381 | 13 | Verified |
| humanmirror.fr. | DS published | 55541 | 8 | Verified |
| humanmirror.fr. | Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains |
| content-security-policy | frame-ancestors 'none'; object-src 'none'; base-uri 'self' |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://humanmirror.fr/api/one/mcp/ | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://humanmirror.fr/api/one/mcp/ | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://humanmirror.fr/api/one/mcp/ |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
humanmirror_do ~297
HumanMirror Agent Control Plane in one MCP tool. Use free intent routing to resolve the right capability, pre-execution safety boundary or post-execution evidence path before spending anything. For measurable deterministic work, outcome_type/input can run a verified Outcome; 6 Nexus credits are kept only on verified success.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| contract_id | string | – | Optional Outcome contract ID returned by a dry run. |
| criteria | object | – | Optional measurable success thresholds. |
| dispatch_only | boolean | – | When true, resolve the canonical HumanMirror route without charging Nexus credits. |
| dry_run | boolean | – | When true, return a free quote and do not reserve or consume credits. |
| input | – | – | JSON input for the requested result. |
| intent | string | – | Optional routing intent, for example sanitize untrusted input, protect an agent purchase, issue execution evidence, use the zero-cost sink, diagnose a payment failure, or request best execution. |
| objective | string | – | Natural-language measurable objective, for example: remove duplicate records and prove none remain. |
| options | object | – | Optional operation-specific settings. |
| outcome_type | string | – | Optional explicit Outcome type: clean_json, deduplicate_records, normalize_entity, data_quality_at_least, detect_anomalies, no_secrets, output_quality, schema_compatible, safe_preflight, execution_re… |
| route_intent | string | – | Alias for intent when the caller wants canonical route discovery. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the HumanMirror One MCP server?
HumanMirror One is a hosted endpoint at https://humanmirror.fr/api/one/mcp/, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · humanmirror.fr
claude mcp add --transport http fr-humanmirror-one 'https://humanmirror.fr/api/one/mcp/'
What is the HumanMirror One MCP server?
HumanMirror One is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as fr.humanmirror/one. Agent routing, safety preflight, execution receipts, best execution and verified outcomes. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://humanmirror.fr/api/one/mcp/).
Is the HumanMirror One MCP server safe to use?
HumanMirror One scores 78 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the HumanMirror One MCP server expose?
HumanMirror One exposes 1 tool: humanmirror_do. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 297 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the HumanMirror One MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to HumanMirror One without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the HumanMirror One MCP server still maintained?
HumanMirror One is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 6 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What did VerifyMCP test on the HumanMirror One MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 12 checks on HumanMirror One, covering TLS certificate, HTTPS, HSTS header, DNSSEC and 8 more. One item could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about HumanMirror One: Authorization. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.