Ideabob Validation
REMOTE · UMXGVOXLXZNNPDVKGNAJ.SUPABASE.CO
Score, validate, and pressure-test startup ideas with AI from Claude or any MCP agent.
Available components
Last scanned (20 hours ago)
Scores higher than 69% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.
Category Marketing and SEO
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security63
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 5 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability82
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 390 tokens (~65/item across 6 items; 5 tools + 1 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage74
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 21% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities40
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-03-26; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 23 Oct 26 0
- Server version: 1.0.0 → 1.0.1 functional
- 16 Oct 26 0
- Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Stability: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Authorization: Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 5 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. security
- MCP protocol: unverified → fail ▼ functional
- Endpoint reachability: unreachable → reachable ▲ functional
- Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- Schema quality: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- 15 Oct 26 0
- Endpoint reachability: reachable → unreachable ▼ security
- Stability: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Authorization: Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to connect, but we couldn't read the whole tool list to see what that exposes. security
- Schema quality: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- Capabilities: fail → unverified ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- 28 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 26 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Aug 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 11 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://umxgvoxlxznnpdvkgnaj.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=supabase.co | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 24 Oct 2026 | 22 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | d2b50611cd88e9c50e4e2231f4d3f059 |
| SANs: supabase.co, *.supabase.co | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of umxgvoxlxznnpdvkgnaj.supabase.co. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| co. | present | 7786 | 8 | Verified |
| supabase.co. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://umxgvoxlxznnpdvkgnaj.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://umxgvoxlxznnpdvkgnaj.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://umxgvoxlxznnpdvkgnaj.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
export_idea_report ~45
Export a complete idea report (scores, validations, pressure tests, competitor analysis, market research) as clean JSON ready for PDF generation.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| ideaId | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
generate_competitor_analysis ~78
Run AI-powered competitor analysis. Provide either an existing ideaId or ad-hoc { idea, websiteUrl }. Returns competitors, strengths/weaknesses, positioning, and competitive score.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| description | string | – | – |
| idea | string | – | – |
| ideaId | string | – | – |
| websiteUrl | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
score_idea ~79
Score a startup or product idea across 9 weighted dimensions. Returns an Opportunity Score (0-100), decision label, breakdown, and reasoning.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| additionalContext | string | – | Description, problem, monetization notes |
| concept | string | yes | Short name/title of the idea |
| targetMarket | string | – | Who the product is for |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
strategic_intelligence ~89
Run the Strategic Intelligence Engine on an existing idea. Synthesizes every completed analysis (score, validation, pressure test, competition, market research, durability, roadmap, cost, discovery) into market landscape, competitive map, white space, feature matrix, moat analysis, category call, strategic recommendations, defensibility score, opportunity ranking and a board-level executive recommendation.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| ideaId | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
validate_market_fit ~84
Run AI-powered market fit validation. Provide either an existing ideaId or an ad-hoc idea description. Returns problem hunt, size check, competition map, traffic prediction, and verdict.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| description | string | – | – |
| idea | string | – | – |
| ideaId | string | – | – |
| targetProblem | string | – | – |
| websiteUrl | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Ideabob Validation MCP server?
Ideabob Validation is a hosted endpoint at https://umxgvoxlxznnpdvkgnaj.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · umxgvoxlxznnpdvkgnaj.supabase.co
claude mcp add --transport http foodyogi-ideaflow-scorer 'https://umxgvoxlxznnpdvkgnaj.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp'
What is the Ideabob Validation MCP server?
Ideabob Validation is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.foodyogi/ideaflow-scorer. Score, validate, and pressure-test startup ideas with AI from Claude or any MCP agent. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://umxgvoxlxznnpdvkgnaj.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp).
Is the Ideabob Validation MCP server safe to use?
Ideabob Validation scores 77 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Ideabob Validation MCP server expose?
Ideabob Validation exposes 5 tools: score_idea, validate_market_fit, generate_competitor_analysis, strategic_intelligence, export_idea_report. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 375 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Ideabob Validation MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Ideabob Validation without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Ideabob Validation MCP server still maintained?
Ideabob Validation is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.