Dockhold
REMOTE · API.DOCKHOLD.EU · 2 COMPONENTS
Deploy your project to a live HTTPS URL from your AI tool; read logs, set variables, resize apps.
Available components
Last scanned (20 hours ago)
Scores higher than 31% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 16 Oct 2026.
Category Cloud Infrastructure
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security57
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to connect, but we couldn't read the whole tool list to see what that exposes. View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
- Schema not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's schema, or could read only part of its tool list.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: one of the two schema captures we compare could not list the server's tools (the server declared tools, or its tool listing failed outright). Comparing them would report every tool as removed, or find nothing to compare at all.Unverified
Tool Coverage0
- Tool coverage not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.Unverified
Tool Safety0
- Tool safety not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.Unverified
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Unverified: 4 categories
Categories scored 0 because we could not verify them: authentication we do not have, an unreachable endpoint, or not enough scan history. We only credit what we can confirm.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 16 Oct 26 0
- This server's schema is too large to store in full, so we cannot compare its tools day to day functional
- 15 Oct 26 0
- This server's schema is too large to store in full, so we cannot compare its tools day to day functional
- 14 Oct 26 +4
- Endpoint reachability: not serving MCP → reachable ▲ functional
- MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- This server's schema is too large to store in full, so we cannot compare its tools day to day functional
- 13 Oct 26 −4
- Endpoint reachability: reachable → not serving MCP ▼ security
- Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- 12 Oct 26 +4
- Endpoint reachability: not serving MCP → reachable ▲ functional
- MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- This server's schema is too large to store in full, so we cannot compare its tools day to day functional
- 10 Oct 26 −31
- Endpoint reachability: reachable → not serving MCP ▼ security
- Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Authorization: Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to connect, but we couldn't read the whole tool list to see what that exposes. security
- Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- 7 Oct 26 +27
- Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
- First check of Judged manipulation: pass security
- Authorization: Authorisation not fully verified: this server exposes a tool marked destructive (remove_app_storage) and its handshake is open, but we could not confirm whether a tool call is gated, so we do not assert it is callable unauthenticated. security
- Schema quality: unverified → fail ▼ functional
- Schema quality: unverified → fail ▼ functional
- Schema quality: unverified → excellent ▲ functional
- Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- First check of Destructive annotations: 100 functional
- First check of Tool coverage: 100 functional
- This server's schema is too large to store in full, so we cannot compare its tools day to day functional
- 5 Oct 26 +4
- Endpoint reachability: not serving MCP → reachable ▲ functional
- MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- This server's schema is too large to store in full, so we cannot compare its tools day to day functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 16 Oct 2026 · Probed https://api.dockhold.eu/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=dockhold.eu | CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 13 Sept 2026 | 12 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 6c1ed54ed261f1b412d534c86cb1dc8342e |
| SANs: *.dockhold.eu, dockhold.eu | ||||||
| CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115 |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of api.dockhold.eu. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| eu. | present | 35926 | 8 | Verified |
| dockhold.eu. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://api.dockhold.eu/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://api.dockhold.eu/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://api.dockhold.eu/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
No tool schema has been captured from this endpoint yet.
How do I install the Dockhold MCP server?
Dockhold is a hosted endpoint at https://api.dockhold.eu/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · api.dockhold.eu
claude mcp add --transport http eu-dockhold-dockhold 'https://api.dockhold.eu/mcp'
What is the Dockhold MCP server?
Dockhold is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as eu.dockhold/dockhold. Deploy your project to a live HTTPS URL from your AI tool; read logs, set variables, resize apps. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://api.dockhold.eu/mcp).
Is the Dockhold MCP server safe to use?
Dockhold scores 37 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
Does the Dockhold MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Dockhold without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Dockhold MCP server still maintained?
Dockhold is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 16 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.