Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

EQIQs Rapport Axis

REMOTE · ADGMSNWJYNQKHAWHIOIL.SUPABASE.CO · SCANNED SEP 21

EQIQs Workplace Dynamics & Psychometric Compatibility Scoring

+3 this week 83 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security94
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability64
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 413 tokens (~59/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management73
  • Stability observed for 22 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage67
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Install

How do I install the EQIQs Rapport Axis MCP server?

EQIQs Rapport Axis is a hosted endpoint at https://adgmsnwjynqkhawhioil.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp-server, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · adgmsnwjynqkhawhioil.supabase.co

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http eqiqs-rapport-axis-core 'https://adgmsnwjynqkhawhioil.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp-server'
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "eqiqs-rapport-axis-core": {
      "url": "https://adgmsnwjynqkhawhioil.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp-server"
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "eqiqs-rapport-axis-core": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://adgmsnwjynqkhawhioil.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp-server"
    }
  }
}
# ~/.codex/config.toml
[mcp_servers.eqiqs-rapport-axis-core]
url = "https://adgmsnwjynqkhawhioil.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp-server"
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "eqiqs-rapport-axis-core": {
      "type": "remote",
      "url": "https://adgmsnwjynqkhawhioil.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp-server",
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add eqiqs-rapport-axis-core --url 'https://adgmsnwjynqkhawhioil.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp-server' --transport streamable-http
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  eqiqs-rapport-axis-core:
    url: "https://adgmsnwjynqkhawhioil.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp-server"
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "eqiqs-rapport-axis-core": {
      "Transport": "http",
      "Url": "https://adgmsnwjynqkhawhioil.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp-server"
    }
  }
}
# add to Vellum
assistant mcp add eqiqs-rapport-axis-core -t streamable-http -u 'https://adgmsnwjynqkhawhioil.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp-server'
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "eqiqs-rapport-axis-core": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://adgmsnwjynqkhawhioil.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp-server"
    }
  }
}

The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 20 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 18 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 17 Sept 26 +14
    • Authorization: unverified → pass security
    • Stability: fail → 0.60 functional
  • 16 Sept 26 −13
    • Authorization: pass → unverified security
    • Stability: 0.53 → fail security
  • 14 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 12 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 9 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 7 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 21 Sept 2026 · Probed https://adgmsnwjynqkhawhioil.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp-server

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=supabase.co CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 26 Aug 2026 24 Nov 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 7c35296a896c0a6f13f8495266045d45
SANs: supabase.co, *.supabase.co
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of adgmsnwjynqkhawhioil.supabase.co. Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
co. present 7786 8 Verified
supabase.co. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication Enforced and verified

The endpoint asked for a token and published valid RFC 9728 metadata describing how to get one.

Result Enforced and verified
Enforced On tool calls
HTTP status 200

WWW-Authenticate challenge Bearer realm="mcp", resource_metadata="https://adgmsnwjynqkhawhioil.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource", error="invalid_token", error_description="Access token is not a JWT"

Bearer realm="mcp", resource_metadata="https://adgmsnwjynqkhawhioil.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource", error="invalid_token", error_description="Access token is not a JWT"
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

Protected resource metadata

Document https://adgmsnwjynqkhawhioil.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource
Retrieved Yes
Resource https://adgmsnwjynqkhawhioil.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp
Authorisation server https://adgmsnwjynqkhawhioil.supabase.co/auth/v1

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://adgmsnwjynqkhawhioil.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp-server Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://adgmsnwjynqkhawhioil.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp-server HTTPS enforced 301 https://adgmsnwjynqkhawhioil.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp-server
MCP tools · 7 exposed · ~362 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
create_profile ~89

Add a person, with optional known traits.

NameTypeReqDescription
attachment_stylestring
date_of_birthstring
departmentstring
disc_typestring
emailstring
enneagram_typestring
eq_scorenumber
mbti_typestring
namestringyes

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

generate_narrative ~86

Premium: write a plain-language coaching narrative for one person or a pair, synthesized from all 21 frameworks. Billed at 5x a normal tool call.

NameTypeReqDescription
audiencestring
compare_withstring
contextstring
focusstring
lengthstring
personstringyes

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_my_profile ~21

The signed-in account holder's own 21-framework profile.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_profile ~47

Full 21-framework read for one person by profile_id, email, or name.

NameTypeReqDescription
emailstring
namestring
profile_idstring

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_profiles ~34

List the user's saved people; optional name or email search.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitnumber
searchstring

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_relationships ~35

List saved pairings and the context each was scored in.

NameTypeReqDescription
contextstring
limitnumber

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

score_compatibility ~50

Score two people for a business, romantic, friendship, or co-parenting context.

NameTypeReqDescription
contextstring
person_astringyes
person_bstringyes

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the EQIQs Rapport Axis MCP server?

EQIQs Rapport Axis is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.EQIQs/rapport-axis-core. EQIQs Workplace Dynamics & Psychometric Compatibility Scoring. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://adgmsnwjynqkhawhioil.supabase.co/functions/v1/mcp-server).

Is the EQIQs Rapport Axis MCP server safe to use?

EQIQs Rapport Axis scores 83 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the EQIQs Rapport Axis MCP server expose?

EQIQs Rapport Axis exposes 7 tools: get_my_profile, list_profiles, get_profile, create_profile, list_relationships, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 362 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the EQIQs Rapport Axis MCP server require authentication?

Yes. EQIQs Rapport Axis asked us for credentials when we connected, so you will need to authorise it in your MCP client before it can do anything.

Is the EQIQs Rapport Axis MCP server still maintained?

EQIQs Rapport Axis is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 21 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.