Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.github.enzoemir1/leadpipe-mcp

NPM · LEADPIPE-MCP-SERVER · SCANNED SEP 20

AI lead qualification: ICP filter, 0-100 scoring, Hunter.io enrichment, HubSpot/Pipedrive export.

Available components

−1 this week 76 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security98
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • 31 of 96 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency19
Schema Quality & AI Usability83
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1579 tokens (~121/item across 13 items; 10 tools + 3 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management90
  • Stability observed for 27 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage71
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 13% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 10 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 11 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Install

How do I install the io.github.enzoemir1/leadpipe-mcp server?

io.github.enzoemir1/leadpipe-mcp runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y leadpipe-mcp-server. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · leadpipe-mcp-server

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add enzoemir1-leadpipe-mcp -- npx -y leadpipe-mcp-server
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "enzoemir1-leadpipe-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "leadpipe-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "enzoemir1-leadpipe-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "leadpipe-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}
# add to Codex CLI
codex mcp add enzoemir1-leadpipe-mcp -- npx -y leadpipe-mcp-server
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "enzoemir1-leadpipe-mcp": {
      "type": "local",
      "command": [
        "npx",
        "-y",
        "leadpipe-mcp-server"
      ],
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add enzoemir1-leadpipe-mcp --command npx --arg -y --arg leadpipe-mcp-server
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  enzoemir1-leadpipe-mcp:
    command: "npx"
    args: ["-y", "leadpipe-mcp-server"]
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "enzoemir1-leadpipe-mcp": {
      "Transport": "stdio",
      "Command": "npx",
      "Arguments": [
        "-y",
        "leadpipe-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}
# add to Vellum
assistant mcp add enzoemir1-leadpipe-mcp -t stdio -c npx -a -y leadpipe-mcp-server
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "enzoemir1-leadpipe-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "leadpipe-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 19 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 16 Sept 26 −3
    • Stability: pass → 0.77 functional
  • 15 Sept 26 +1
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 13 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 11 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 9 Sept 26 −3
    • Schema quality: excellent → good functional
    • Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
  • 8 Sept 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 7 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Analysed npm/leadpipe-mcp-server@1.4.0

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem npm

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 96 packages
Packages resolved 96
Stale 31
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 10 exposed · ~1,540 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
config_scoring ~206

View or update the global lead scoring configuration used by lead_score. Call with no fields (empty object) to fetch the current config. Pass any subset of fields to patch-update: six dimension weights (each 0–1, should sum to ~1 but not enforced), high_value_titles (string array), high_value_industries (string array), preferred_company_sizes, and custom_rules (array of {name, condition, points}). Changes apply to future lead_score calls only — previously scored leads keep their scores until re-scored.

NameTypeReqDescription
company_size_weightnumber
custom_rulesarray
custom_rules_weightnumber
engagement_weightnumber
high_value_industriesarray
high_value_titlesarray
industry_weightnumber
job_title_weightnumber
preferred_company_sizesarray
recency_weightnumber

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

lead_batch_ingest ~88

Add 1 to 100 leads in a single call. Each lead uses the same schema as lead_ingest. Returns {ingested: Lead[], skipped: Array<{email, reason}>} — duplicates are skipped (not failed) so a partial batch still succeeds. Prefer this over repeated lead_ingest calls for bulk imports (CSV/webhook drops).

NameTypeReqDescription
leadsarrayyes

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

lead_demo_seed ~155

Populate the pipeline with a realistic demo dataset: 14 leads across 5 archetypes (hot decision-makers, warm mid-level, cold junior/small-co, raw unenriched, and disqualified). Each lead has appropriate enrichment state, scoring breakdown, and status, so every downstream tool — lead_list, lead_search, lead_score, crm_export, and the pipeline-overview resource — returns meaningful output immediately. Use this to evaluate LeadPipe via MCP Inspector without Hunter, HubSpot, or Pipedrive API keys. Safe to call multiple times; each call appends a fresh batch with new UUIDs. Returns counts by status plus sample_lead_ids you can feed into lead_enrich, lead_score, or crm_export.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

lead_enrich ~111

Derive and attach company data to an existing lead using the email domain: company name, industry, size, country, website, estimated headcount, and common tech stack. Does not call external APIs — enrichment is driven by the built-in domain knowledge base. Updates the lead in place and returns the enriched record, ready for lead_score. Run this before lead_score for the best qualification accuracy.

NameTypeReqDescription
lead_idstringyesUUID of the lead to enrich (returned by lead_ingest or lead_search)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

lead_export ~145

Push leads to an external destination. target must be one of "hubspot", "pipedrive", "google_sheets", "csv", or "json". For CRM targets (hubspot, pipedrive) the respective API key env var must be set (HUBSPOT_API_KEY, PIPEDRIVE_API_TOKEN) — if missing, the tool returns a dry-run payload instead of erroring. Filter the export via lead_ids (explicit list) or min_score (everything above threshold). Returns {target, count, summary, errors?}.

NameTypeReqDescription
lead_idsarray
min_scorenumber
targetstringyes

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

lead_ingest ~207

Add a single lead to the pipeline. Required: email. Optional: first_name, last_name, job_title, company_name, phone, source ("website"|"linkedin"|"referral"|"event"|"cold_outreach"|"partner"|"other"), tags (string array), custom_fields. Returns the stored lead object with a generated UUID, initial status="new", created_at, and a null score (run lead_score to populate). Throws a duplicate error if the email is already in the pipeline — use lead_search first if you need upsert behaviour.

NameTypeReqDescription
company_domainstring
company_namestring
custom_fieldsobject
emailstringyes
first_namestring
job_titlestring
last_namestring
phonestring
sourcestring
source_detailstring
tagsarray

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

lead_qualify ~271

Filter leads against your Ideal Customer Profile BEFORE spending enrichment credits. Uses only locally-available signals (email domain, job_title, country, industry hints, tech_stack) so nothing is charged to Hunter.io, HubSpot, Pipedrive, or any other external service. Set auto_disqualify=true to also update rejected leads to status="disqualified" with the reject reasons stored in custom_fields. If lead_ids is omitted, evaluates every lead currently in status="new". Pairs naturally with upstream platform-detection tools (e.g. Detecto's detect_platform) — run that first to populate company.tech_stack, then run lead_qualify with required_tech_stack=["shopify"] to drop wrong-platform leads before they cost a single API call. Returns qualified/rejected counts, per-lead reasons, and an estimated credit savings figure.

NameTypeReqDescription
auto_disqualifybooleanIf true, rejected leads have status set to "disqualified" and reasons stored in custom_fields. If false (default), just returns the evaluation without mutating storage.
criteriaobjectyesAt least one criterion is required. All provided criteria must pass for a lead to qualify.
lead_idsarraySpecific lead IDs to evaluate. If omitted, evaluates all leads with status="new".

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

lead_score ~123

Compute a 6-dimensional qualification score (0-100) for a lead: job_title, company_size, industry, engagement, recency, and custom_rules. Each dimension is weighted via config_scoring; the final score is their weighted average. Updates the lead status to "qualified" (≥60) or "disqualified" (<60) and stores score_breakdown alongside the total. Returns the updated lead with the breakdown. Run lead_enrich first for the most accurate industry/size signals.

NameTypeReqDescription
lead_idstringyesUUID of the lead to score

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

lead_search ~154

Search and filter the lead pipeline. Optional filters: query (free-text over name/email/company), status ("new"|"qualified"|"disqualified"|"contacted"|"converted"), min_score, max_score, source, tags (array), date_from/date_to. Pagination via limit (default 50, max 200) and offset. Returns {total, leads[]}. Use this to drive exports, targeted scoring, and dashboards.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger
max_scorenumber
min_scorenumber
offsetinteger
querystring
sourcestring
statusstring
tagsarray

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

pipeline_stats ~80

Portfolio-wide pipeline analytics across all leads. Returns {total_leads, leads_today, leads_this_week, leads_this_month, avg_score, qualified_rate (percent), by_status (counts per status), by_source (counts per source), score_distribution}. Takes no input — always aggregates the full dataset. Ideal for dashboards, stand-ups, and conversion-rate tracking.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the io.github.enzoemir1/leadpipe-mcp server?

io.github.enzoemir1/leadpipe-mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.enzoemir1/leadpipe-mcp. AI lead qualification: ICP filter, 0-100 scoring, Hunter.io enrichment, HubSpot/Pipedrive export. This page covers its npm package (leadpipe-mcp-server).

Is the io.github.enzoemir1/leadpipe-mcp server safe to use?

io.github.enzoemir1/leadpipe-mcp scores 76 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 20 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the io.github.enzoemir1/leadpipe-mcp server expose?

io.github.enzoemir1/leadpipe-mcp exposes 10 tools: lead_demo_seed, lead_qualify, lead_ingest, lead_batch_ingest, lead_enrich, and 5 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,540 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the io.github.enzoemir1/leadpipe-mcp server still maintained?

io.github.enzoemir1/leadpipe-mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the io.github.enzoemir1/leadpipe-mcp server under?

io.github.enzoemir1/leadpipe-mcp declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.