Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

熔岩 Lava · A股机构/大V消息面热度监测

REMOTE · LAVA.AI-DOLPHIN.COM

查A股个股/概念最近被多少机构/大V提及、热度高不高。只读数据,机构/大V用匿名ID。量化交易必备。

0 this week 31 Trust /100

Last scanned (15 hours ago)

Scores higher than 14% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Finance and Payments

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security78
Transport & Reachability0
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
  • Schema blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read it. See how to fix → Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
  • Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage0
  • Tool coverage blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read its tools.Unverified
Tool Safety0
  • Tool safety blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read its tools.Unverified
Capabilities0
  • Capabilities blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read them. See how to fix → Unverified

Unverified: 6 categories

Categories scored 0 because we could not verify them: authentication we do not have, an unreachable endpoint, or not enough scan history. We only credit what we can confirm. Claim this server and supply a read-only token to verify it and lift the score.

What we tested

Checks we ran (4)

  • TLS certificate
  • Authorization
  • HSTS header
  • DNSSEC

Checks we could not complete (7)

These are gaps on our side, not findings about this hosted endpoint. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.

  • HTTPS in Endpoint SecurityHTTPS enforcement could not be verified: the plaintext port answered with HTTP 405, which proves neither a plaintext path nor enforcement.
  • Transport in Transport & Reachability (scores 0 for this)Transport blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to verify streamable-http.
  • Schema quality in Schema Quality & AI Usability (scores 0 for this)Schema blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read it.
  • Stability in Stability & Change Management (scores 0 for this)Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).
  • Tool coverage in Tool Coverage (scores 0 for this)Tool coverage blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read its tools.
  • Tool safety in Tool Safety (scores 0 for this)Tool safety blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read its tools.
  • Capabilities in Capabilities (scores 0 for this)Capabilities blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read them.

Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)

  • Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
  • Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 29 Oct 26 +3
    • Authorization: fail → pass ▲ security
    • First check of Authorization: partial security
  • 27 Oct 26 28

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://lava.ai-dolphin.com/subscribe/v1/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=*.ai-dolphin.com CN=RapidSSL TLS RSA CA G1,OU=www.digicert.com,O=DigiCert Inc,C=US 10 Feb 2026 9 Feb 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA c4c678f2a996380c328217e49502877
SANs: *.ai-dolphin.com, ai-dolphin.com
CN=RapidSSL TLS RSA CA G1,OU=www.digicert.com,O=DigiCert Inc,C=US (CA) CN=DigiCert Global Root G2,OU=www.digicert.com,O=DigiCert Inc,C=US 2 Nov 2017 2 Nov 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA b259422ced9812a15a04e99528a0efa
CN=DigiCert Global Root G2,OU=www.digicert.com,O=DigiCert Inc,C=US (CA) CN=DigiCert Global Root CA,OU=www.digicert.com,O=DigiCert Inc,C=US 18 Jan 2024 9 Nov 2031 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA fe032ab844d033106c50c8e13c8b068

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of lava.ai-dolphin.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. Trust anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. DS published 19718 13 Verified
ai-dolphin.com. No DS Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication Enforced and verified

The endpoint asked for a token and published valid RFC 9728 metadata describing how to get one.

Result Enforced and verified
Enforced On connection
HTTP status 401

WWW-Authenticate challenge Bearer realm="lava-subscribe", resource_metadata="https://lava.ai-dolphin.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/subscribe/v1/mcp"

Bearer realm="lava-subscribe", resource_metadata="https://lava.ai-dolphin.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/subscribe/v1/mcp"
Header Value
www-authenticate Bearer realm="lava-subscribe", resource_metadata="https://lava.ai-dolphin.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/subscribe/v1/mcp"

Protected resource metadata

Document https://lava.ai-dolphin.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/subscribe/v1/mcp
Retrieved Yes
Resource https://lava.ai-dolphin.com/subscribe/v1/mcp
Authorisation server https://lava.ai-dolphin.com/subscribe/v1/oauth

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://lava.ai-dolphin.com/subscribe/v1/mcp Auth required 401
http (plaintext) http://lava.ai-dolphin.com/subscribe/v1/mcp Inconclusive 405
MCP tools

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

No tool schema has been captured from this endpoint yet.

Install

How do I install the 熔岩 Lava · A股机构/大V消息面热度监测 MCP server?

熔岩 Lava · A股机构/大V消息面热度监测 is a hosted endpoint at https://lava.ai-dolphin.com/subscribe/v1/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · lava.ai-dolphin.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http dustinliang666-blip-lava-mcp 'https://lava.ai-dolphin.com/subscribe/v1/mcp'
Common questions

What is the 熔岩 Lava · A股机构/大V消息面热度监测 MCP server?

熔岩 Lava · A股机构/大V消息面热度监测 is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.dustinliang666-blip/lava-mcp. 查A股个股/概念最近被多少机构/大V提及、热度高不高。只读数据,机构/大V用匿名ID。量化交易必备。 This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://lava.ai-dolphin.com/subscribe/v1/mcp).

Is the 熔岩 Lava · A股机构/大V消息面热度监测 MCP server safe to use?

熔岩 Lava · A股机构/大V消息面热度监测 scores 31 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

Does the 熔岩 Lava · A股机构/大V消息面热度监测 MCP server require authentication?

Yes. 熔岩 Lava · A股机构/大V消息面热度监测 asked us for credentials when we connected, so you will need to authorise it in your MCP client before it can do anything.

Is the 熔岩 Lava · A股机构/大V消息面热度监测 MCP server still maintained?

熔岩 Lava · A股机构/大V消息面热度监测 is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What did VerifyMCP test on the 熔岩 Lava · A股机构/大V消息面热度监测 MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 4 checks on 熔岩 Lava · A股机构/大V消息面热度监测, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HSTS header and DNSSEC. 7 items could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about 熔岩 Lava · A股机构/大V消息面热度监测: HTTPS, Transport, Schema quality, Stability and 3 more. 6 categories score 0 for that reason, because we only credit what we can confirm. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.