Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Gearcoleco MCP Server

MCPB · WIN-ARM64 · 6 COMPONENTS

MCP server for Gearcoleco ColecoVision emulator

0 this week 9 Trust /100

Last scanned (13 hours ago)

Scores higher than 34% of MCPB servers

Category Entertainment and Games

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security0
  • No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.Unverified
  • Known CVEs could not be checked: we found no dependency list to check in this bundle: either it runs a compiled binary, whose bundled manifests we do not read, or none of the package.json, requirements.txt, pyproject.toml or uv.lock files it ships for its runtime declares a dependency we can read (a requirements.txt that only points at a setup.py project, a local path, or a nested requirements file we cannot follow counts as none).Unverified
  • Install-script risk not yet assessed.Unverified
  • Dependency health could not be checked: we found no dependency list to check in this bundle: either it runs a compiled binary, whose bundled manifests we do not read, or none of the package.json, requirements.txt, pyproject.toml or uv.lock files it ships for its runtime declares a dependency we can read (a requirements.txt that only points at a setup.py project, a local path, or a nested requirements file we cannot follow counts as none).Unverified
Provenance & Transparency45
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
  • Schema quality not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no schema to assess.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
  • Stability not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no schema to compare.Unverified
Tool Coverage0
  • Tool coverage not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no tool definitions to assess.Unverified
Tool Safety0
  • Tool safety not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no tool text to scan.Unverified
Capabilities0
  • Protocol version not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we never saw its MCP handshake.Unverified

Unverified: 6 categories

Categories scored 0 because we could not verify them: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.

What we tested

Checks we ran (5)

  • Source repository
  • Provenance
  • License
  • Maintenance
  • Security disclosure

Checks we could not complete (9)

These are gaps on our side, not findings about this package. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.

  • Malware scan in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.
  • Known CVEs in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)Known CVEs could not be checked: we found no dependency list to check in this bundle: either it runs a compiled binary, whose bundled manifests we do not read, or none of the package.json, requirements.txt, pyproject.toml or uv.lock files it ships for its runtime declares a dependency we can read (a requirements.txt that only points at a setup.py project, a local path, or a nested requirements file we cannot follow counts as none).
  • Install scripts in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)Install-script risk not yet assessed.
  • Dependency health in Supply Chain Security (scores 0 for this)Dependency health could not be checked: we found no dependency list to check in this bundle: either it runs a compiled binary, whose bundled manifests we do not read, or none of the package.json, requirements.txt, pyproject.toml or uv.lock files it ships for its runtime declares a dependency we can read (a requirements.txt that only points at a setup.py project, a local path, or a nested requirements file we cannot follow counts as none).
  • Schema quality in Schema Quality & AI Usability (scores 0 for this)Schema quality not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no schema to assess.
  • Stability in Stability & Change Management (scores 0 for this)Stability not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no schema to compare.
  • Tool coverage in Tool Coverage (scores 0 for this)Tool coverage not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no tool definitions to assess.
  • Tool safety in Tool Safety (scores 0 for this)Tool safety not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no tool text to scan.
  • Capabilities in Capabilities (scores 0 for this)Protocol version not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we never saw its MCP handshake.

Does not apply to this package (2)

  • Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
  • Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 21 Oct 26 0
    • Provenance: unverified → fail ▼ security
  • 20 Oct 26 0
    • Provenance: fail → unverified ▼ security
  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 27 Sept 26 0

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed mcpb/https://github.com/drhelius/gearcoleco/releases/download/1.7.6/Gearcoleco-1.7.6-mcpb-windows-arm64.mcpb

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem mcpb
Reason No attestation published

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

MCP tools

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tools for package channels are captured by running the package in an isolated sandbox. Our sandbox could not run this package, so no tool list has been captured. That is a gap on our side, not a finding about the package.

Install

How do I install the Gearcoleco MCP Server server?

Gearcoleco MCP Server ships as an MCPB bundle, a single file you download and open in an MCP host that supports MCPB bundles, such as Claude Desktop. The host reads the launch command from the bundle's own manifest, so there is no command to copy. Before opening it, check the file's SHA-256 matches the one the MCP registry declares for it, b2a54a8ae1809d4d2bd94578bca916d172d9affa64f2358e1579b31f3cff8af4; the commands to do that are on this page. If it does not match, do not open it.

mcpb · win-arm64

Download bundle

Check the download matches the SHA-256 the MCP registry declares before you open it. If it does not match, do not open the file.

SHA-256

b2a54a8ae1809d4d2bd94578bca916d172d9affa64f2358e1579b31f3cff8af4

macOS / Linux

echo "b2a54a8ae1809d4d2bd94578bca916d172d9affa64f2358e1579b31f3cff8af4  Gearcoleco-1.7.6-mcpb-windows-arm64.mcpb" | shasum -a 256 -c

Windows (PowerShell)

(Get-FileHash -Algorithm SHA256 .\Gearcoleco-1.7.6-mcpb-windows-arm64.mcpb).Hash -eq "b2a54a8ae1809d4d2bd94578bca916d172d9affa64f2358e1579b31f3cff8af4"

Run it in the folder you saved the bundle to, then open the file with an MCPB-capable host such as Claude Desktop.

Common questions

What is the Gearcoleco MCP Server server?

Gearcoleco MCP Server is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.drhelius/gearcoleco. MCP server for Gearcoleco ColecoVision emulator. This page covers its MCPB bundle (https://github.com/drhelius/gearcoleco/releases/download/1.7.6/Gearcoleco-1.7.6-mcpb-windows-arm64.mcpb).

Is the Gearcoleco MCP Server server safe to use?

Gearcoleco MCP Server scores 9 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What licence is the Gearcoleco MCP Server server under?

Gearcoleco MCP Server declares the GPL-3.0 licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.

What did VerifyMCP test on the Gearcoleco MCP Server server?

VerifyMCP ran 5 checks on Gearcoleco MCP Server, covering Source repository, Provenance, License, Maintenance and 1 more. 9 items could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about Gearcoleco MCP Server: Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health and 5 more. 6 categories score 0 for that reason, because we only credit what we can confirm. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to an MCPB bundle, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.