Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.github.dorianfields/x402-cite-check

REMOTE · HERMES-EARN.TAILEA28C0.TS.NET

Verify cited URLs still resolve: reachability, HTTP status and page title. x402-paid.

+7 this week 70 Trust /100

Last scanned (4 hours ago)

Scores higher than 60% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 18 Oct 2026.

Category Search and Retrieval

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security57
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability77
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 105 tokens (~105/item across 1 items; 1 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management47
  • Stability observed for 14 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 1 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 2 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 18 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 17 Oct 26 +1
    • HSTS header: unverified → fail ▼ security
    • Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • TLS certificate: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Transport: fail → pass ▲ security
    • Authorization: Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 1 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. security
    • MCP protocol: unverified → fail ▼ functional
    • Endpoint reachability: unreachable → reachable ▲ functional
    • Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
    • Stability: unverified → 0.43 ▲ functional
  • 16 Oct 26 0
    • Endpoint reachability: reachable → unreachable ▼ security
    • Stability: 0.37 → unverified ▼ security
    • HSTS header: fail → unverified ▼ security
    • Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • TLS certificate: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Transport: pass → fail ▼ security
    • Authorization: Authorisation not yet verified: we couldn't confirm whether this endpoint requires it. security
    • Capabilities: fail → unverified ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
  • 14 Oct 26 +30
    • HSTS header: unverified → fail ▼ security
    • DNSSEC: unverified → fail ▼ security
    • Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • TLS certificate: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Transport: fail → pass ▲ security
    • Authorization: Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 1 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. security
    • MCP protocol: unverified → fail ▼ functional
    • Endpoint reachability: unreachable → reachable ▲ functional
    • Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
    • Stability: unverified → 0.33 ▲ functional
  • 13 Oct 26 −12

    The score moved with no change recorded against any check. We would rather say so than guess.

  • 12 Oct 26 −13

    The score moved with no change recorded against any check. We would rather say so than guess.

  • 7 Oct 26 0
    • Endpoint reachability: reachable → unreachable ▼ security
    • DNSSEC: fail → unverified ▼ security
    • HSTS header: fail → unverified ▼ security
    • Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • TLS certificate: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Transport: pass → fail ▼ security
    • Authorization: Authorisation not yet verified: we couldn't confirm whether this endpoint requires it. security
    • Capabilities: fail → unverified ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
    • First check of Schema quality: unverified functional
  • 4 Oct 26 63

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 18 Oct 2026 · Probed https://hermes-earn.tailea28c0.ts.net/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=hermes-earn.tailea28c0.ts.net CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 3 Oct 2026 1 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 6af868d80f2be27aa667f124a9aa2dabd08
SANs: hermes-earn.tailea28c0.ts.net
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of hermes-earn.tailea28c0.ts.net. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
net. present 37331 13 Verified
ts.net. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://hermes-earn.tailea28c0.ts.net/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://hermes-earn.tailea28c0.ts.net/mcp HTTPS enforced 302 https://hermes-earn.tailea28c0.ts.net/mcp
MCP tools · 1 exposed · ~65 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
cite_check ~65

Validate a list of URLs and return, for each one, whether it is reachable plus its HTTP status and <title>. Use it to check that sources cited in a document still resolve before publishing.

NameTypeReqDescription
urlsarrayyesAbsolute http(s) URLs to check (max 5).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the io.github.dorianfields/x402-cite-check MCP server?

io.github.dorianfields/x402-cite-check is a hosted endpoint at https://hermes-earn.tailea28c0.ts.net/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · hermes-earn.tailea28c0.ts.net

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http dorianfields-x402-cite-check 'https://hermes-earn.tailea28c0.ts.net/mcp'
Common questions

What is the io.github.dorianfields/x402-cite-check MCP server?

io.github.dorianfields/x402-cite-check is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.dorianfields/x402-cite-check. Verify cited URLs still resolve: reachability, HTTP status and page title. x402-paid. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://hermes-earn.tailea28c0.ts.net/mcp).

Is the io.github.dorianfields/x402-cite-check MCP server safe to use?

io.github.dorianfields/x402-cite-check scores 70 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the io.github.dorianfields/x402-cite-check MCP server expose?

io.github.dorianfields/x402-cite-check exposes 1 tool: cite_check. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 65 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the io.github.dorianfields/x402-cite-check MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to io.github.dorianfields/x402-cite-check without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the io.github.dorianfields/x402-cite-check MCP server still maintained?

io.github.dorianfields/x402-cite-check is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 18 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.