Samotpravil MCP
NPM · SAMOTPRAVIL-MCP
MCP server for Samotpravil API — docs, typed tools, Python SDK parity, safety flags.
Available components
Last scanned (18 hours ago)
Scores higher than 93% of npm servers
Category Marketing and SEO
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security98
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- 30 of 92 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency74
- Repository check failed: the declared repository URL redirects; it must resolve directly. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to dkanster/samotpravil-mcp). View diagnostics → Pass
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 115 days ago).Pass
- Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability76
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
- Tool/resource definitions use about 6091 tokens (~50/item across 121 items; 58 tools + 63 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage89
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 68% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- All 8 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 59 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Checks we ran (16)
- Malware scan
- Known CVEs
- Install scripts
- Dependency health
- Source repository
- Provenance
- License
- Maintenance
- Security disclosure
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Does not apply to this package (2)
- Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
- Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 3 Nov 26 −1
- Stability: pass → 0.93 functional
- 31 Oct 26 +1
- Security disclosure: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- 30 Oct 26 −1
- Security disclosure: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- 28 Oct 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 27 Oct 26 0
- Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
- 21 Oct 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/samotpravil-mcp@1.8.0
Provenance Verified
A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.
| Result | Verified |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
| Reason | Verified |
| Discovered via | Registry attestation endpoint |
| Source repo | dkanster/samotpravil-mcp |
| Certificate issuer | https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com |
| Certificate SAN | https://github.com/dkanster/samotpravil-mcp/.github/workflows/publish.yml@refs/tags/v1.8.0 |
| Rekor log index | 2160565328 |
| Predicate type | SLSA build provenance https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1 |
| Subject digest | sha512:f9804a2d5e44d45c75a6255a02ee651041db8c2231adc733cd313df9ba5fd404c7722081e67f7a77fb43d057e0ea183f8567e609d7c338f79aa1a332a |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Dependencies 92 packages
| Packages resolved | 92 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 30 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
stop_list_export_download ~59
GET /api/v2/stop-list/export/{token} (Python SDK parity)
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| dry_run | boolean | – | Показать запрос без отправки на API |
| token | string | yes | Имя файла из stop_list_export_create |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
stop_list_export_tasks ~53
GET /api/v2/stop-list/export — список задач экспорта (Python SDK parity)
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| dry_run | boolean | – | Показать запрос без отправки на API |
| status | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
stop_list_failed ~67
GET /api/v2/stop-list/failed (Python SDK parity)
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| cursor_next | integer | – | Пагинация |
| dry_run | boolean | – | Показать запрос без отправки на API |
| limit | integer | – | Лимит (default 50) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
stop_list_fbl ~68
GET /api/v2/stop-list/fbl (Python SDK parity)
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| cursor_next | integer | – | Пагинация |
| dry_run | boolean | – | Показать запрос без отправки на API |
| limit | integer | – | Лимит (default 50) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
stop_list_unsubscribe ~68
GET /api/v2/stop-list/unsubscribe (Python SDK parity)
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| cursor_next | integer | – | Пагинация |
| dry_run | boolean | – | Показать запрос без отправки на API |
| limit | integer | – | Лимит (default 50) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
stop_package ~49
GET /api/v1/package_stop — остановить пакет (Python SDK parity)
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| dry_run | boolean | – | Показать запрос без отправки на API |
| package_id | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
update_blist ~116
POST /api/v2/blist/update — WhiteLabel (Python SDK parity)
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| active | boolean | – | – |
| blist_id | string|number | yes | – |
| check_stop_list | boolean | – | – |
| dry_run | boolean | – | Показать запрос без отправки на API |
| name | string | – | – |
| web_hook_send_accepted_delivered | boolean | – | – |
| webhook_active | boolean | – | – |
| webhook_send_xml_failed_global | boolean | – | – |
| webhook_url | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
validate_email ~48
POST /api/v2/emails/validate/
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| dry_run | boolean | – | Показать запрос без отправки на API |
| string | yes | Email для валидации |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Samotpravil MCP server?
Samotpravil MCP runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y samotpravil-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · samotpravil-mcp
claude mcp add dkanster-samotpravil-mcp -- npx -y samotpravil-mcp
What is the Samotpravil MCP server?
Samotpravil MCP is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.dkanster/samotpravil-mcp. MCP server for Samotpravil API, docs, typed tools, Python SDK parity, safety flags. This page covers its npm package (samotpravil-mcp).
Is the Samotpravil MCP server safe to use?
Samotpravil MCP scores 89 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 5 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Samotpravil MCP server expose?
Samotpravil MCP exposes 58 tools: get_overview, list_endpoints, search_docs, get_endpoint, api_request, and 53 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 4,153 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the Samotpravil MCP server still maintained?
Samotpravil MCP is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the Samotpravil MCP server under?
Samotpravil MCP declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.
What did VerifyMCP test on the Samotpravil MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 16 checks on Samotpravil MCP, covering Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health and 12 more. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to an npm package, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.