io.github.diyaluo/web-extract-mcp
OCI · GHCR.IO/DIYALUO/WEB-EXTRACT-MCP
Local HTML to structured extraction MCP server (links, tables, title, body), offline.
Available components
Last scanned (11 hours ago)
Scores higher than 47% of OCI servers
Category Web Scraping
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security0
- No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.Unverified
- Known CVEs could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.Unverified
- Install-script risk not yet assessed.Unverified
- Dependency health could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.Unverified
Provenance & Transparency6
- Repository check failed: no source repository is declared. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- License check failed: no license is declared. See how to fix → Fail
- Actively maintained (last published 5 days ago).Pass
- Security-disclosure policy not yet verified: we couldn't inspect the source repository.Unverified
Schema Quality & AI Usability64
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 399 tokens (~133/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management20
- Stability observed for 6 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage67
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Unverified: 1 category
A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 24 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 22 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 19 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 0 to 3. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 0 days of observed history at the previous scan, 1 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Oct 26 28
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 24 Oct 2026 · Analysed oci/ghcr.io/diyaluo/web-extract-mcp@v0.1.0
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | oci |
| Reason | No attestation published |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
extract_batch ~112
批量处理目录下所有 .html/.htm：每个文件在 output_dir 下建同名子目录，内含 <名>.md（mode=all）/ tables.xlsx / links.json，并生成 _batch_index.json。recursive=True 递归子目录。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| frontmatter | boolean | – | – |
| include_script | boolean | – | – |
| input_dir | string | yes | – |
| mode | string | – | – |
| output_dir | string | yes | – |
| recursive | boolean | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
extract_page ~176
解析单个本地 .html/.htm 文件并落盘。mode: 'all' 输出正文 Markdown；'tables' 输出表格——output_path 以 .xlsx 结尾时导出单工作簿多 sheet，否则输出到该目录下的 table1.csv/table2.csv…；'links' 输出链接清单 JSON。include_script 保留内联 JSON-LD/JS；frontmatter 给 Markdown 加 YAML 头；base_url 手工指定相对链接转绝对的基准 URL（页面有 <base> 时可省略）。
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| base_url | string | – | – |
| frontmatter | boolean | – | – |
| include_script | boolean | – | – |
| input_path | string | yes | – |
| mode | string | – | – |
| output_path | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
selftest ~40
运行核心引擎自检（标题/正文/script剔除/链接绝对化/表格/JSON-LD/批量）。
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the io.github.diyaluo/web-extract-mcp server?
io.github.diyaluo/web-extract-mcp runs locally as a container image, launched with docker run --rm -i ghcr.io/diyaluo/web-extract-mcp:v0.1.0. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 3 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
oci · ghcr.io/diyaluo/web-extract-mcp
claude mcp add diyaluo-web-extract-mcp -- docker run --rm -i ghcr.io/diyaluo/web-extract-mcp:v0.1.0
What is the io.github.diyaluo/web-extract-mcp server?
io.github.diyaluo/web-extract-mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.diyaluo/web-extract-mcp. Local HTML to structured extraction MCP server (links, tables, title, body), offline. This page covers its container image (ghcr.io/diyaluo/web-extract-mcp).
Is the io.github.diyaluo/web-extract-mcp server safe to use?
io.github.diyaluo/web-extract-mcp scores 31 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.diyaluo/web-extract-mcp server expose?
io.github.diyaluo/web-extract-mcp exposes 3 tools: extract_page, extract_batch, selftest. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 328 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the io.github.diyaluo/web-extract-mcp server still maintained?
io.github.diyaluo/web-extract-mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 24 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.