Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

dev.workers.sebastiaan-ba3.payverify/tools

REMOTE · PAYVERIFY.SEBASTIAAN-BA3.WORKERS.DEV

Verify a Base USDC transaction or x402 settlement landed. Free, no account needed.

+3 this week 60 Trust /100

Last scanned (21 hours ago)

Scores higher than 46% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 22 Oct 2026.

Category Crypto and Web3

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security46
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability64
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 373 tokens (~373/item across 1 items; 1 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management23
  • Stability observed for 7 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 1 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 2 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 22 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 0
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Schema quality: excellent → good functional
  • 20 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 18 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 16 Oct 26 0
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Schema quality: 258 → 409 ▼ functional
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
    • Schema quality: good → excellent functional
  • 15 Oct 26 57

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 22 Oct 2026 · Probed https://payverify.sebastiaan-ba3.workers.dev/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=sebastiaan-ba3.workers.dev CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 18 Sept 2026 17 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 61f8a0e14c80aee897d02cfc8b1b838082b
SANs: *.sebastiaan-ba3.workers.dev, sebastiaan-ba3.workers.dev
CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of payverify.sebastiaan-ba3.workers.dev. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
dev. present 60074 8 Verified
workers.dev. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://payverify.sebastiaan-ba3.workers.dev/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://payverify.sebastiaan-ba3.workers.dev/mcp Served over HTTP 200
MCP tools · 1 exposed · ~155 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
verify_base_usdc_tx ~155

Verify a Base (Ethereum L2) transaction and report every USDC Transfer event in it: sender, recipient, amount, block number, on-chain success, and confirmation age. Free, no account, reads Base's public JSON-RPC live. Example you can call right now, no setup: {"tx": "0xad887d8844d9d8b093b8040c1950e66b7cf3c9f3c98644bed7fb911c6a2e8079"} -- a real, already-settled USDC transfer, always returns found:true.

NameTypeReqDescription
txstringyes0x-prefixed 64-hex-character Base transaction hash.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the dev.workers.sebastiaan-ba3.payverify/tools MCP server?

dev.workers.sebastiaan-ba3.payverify/tools is a hosted endpoint at https://payverify.sebastiaan-ba3.workers.dev/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · payverify.sebastiaan-ba3.workers.dev

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http dev-workers-sebastiaan-ba3-payverify-tools 'https://payverify.sebastiaan-ba3.workers.dev/mcp'
Common questions

What is the dev.workers.sebastiaan-ba3.payverify/tools MCP server?

dev.workers.sebastiaan-ba3.payverify/tools is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as dev.workers.sebastiaan-ba3.payverify/tools. Verify a Base USDC transaction or x402 settlement landed. Free, no account needed. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://payverify.sebastiaan-ba3.workers.dev/mcp).

Is the dev.workers.sebastiaan-ba3.payverify/tools MCP server safe to use?

dev.workers.sebastiaan-ba3.payverify/tools scores 60 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the dev.workers.sebastiaan-ba3.payverify/tools MCP server expose?

dev.workers.sebastiaan-ba3.payverify/tools exposes 1 tool: verify_base_usdc_tx. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 155 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the dev.workers.sebastiaan-ba3.payverify/tools MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to dev.workers.sebastiaan-ba3.payverify/tools without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the dev.workers.sebastiaan-ba3.payverify/tools MCP server still maintained?

dev.workers.sebastiaan-ba3.payverify/tools is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 22 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.