Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

RobotsGate

REMOTE · ROBOTSGATE.MIKE-TUSA.WORKERS.DEV

Generate, validate and check robots.txt rules for AI crawlers. Free; optional Pro key.

+3 this week 74 Trust /100

Last scanned (2 hours ago)

Scores higher than 62% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Web Scraping

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability63
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 901 tokens (~225/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management67
  • Stability observed for 20 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://robotsgate.mike-tusa.workers.dev/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=mike-tusa.workers.dev CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 12 Oct 2026 10 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 f05aa95d8943eeed0e4e86dd1f6f1e02
SANs: mike-tusa.workers.dev, *.mike-tusa.workers.dev
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of robotsgate.mike-tusa.workers.dev. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
dev. present 60074 8 Verified
workers.dev. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
x-content-type-options nosniff

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://robotsgate.mike-tusa.workers.dev/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://robotsgate.mike-tusa.workers.dev/mcp Inconclusive 405
MCP tools · 4 exposed · ~689 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
check_site ~140

Fetch a site's /robots.txt (http/https on the default port only; private, loopback and internal addresses are refused; up to 512,000 bytes; results cached for 5 minutes) and report, for one path, which registry AI crawlers are allowed or blocked, plus validation errors and warnings. Read-only: one GET of /robots.txt with a RobotsGate user-agent. Same engine as GET /api/check.

NameTypeReqDescription
pathstring–URL path to test, starting with "/" (default "/").
urlstringyesSite URL or bare hostname, e.g. example.com. Only the scheme and host are used.
NameTypeReqDescription
ai_crawlers––Per-crawler results, or null when robots.txt was unreachable
cacheobject––
fetched_atstring––
final_urlstringyes–
http_statusintegeryes–
interpretationstringyes–
pathstring––
personal_agents––Object, or null when robots.txt was unreachable
redirectsinteger––
robots_foundbooleanyes–
urlstringyes–

No examples provided.

generate_robots ~324

Build a robots.txt from per-category choices (allow, block or omit for training, dataset, search, user_fetch or other), optional per-token overrides, a default policy for other bots, paths, sitemaps and custom rules. Returns the file text, a per-crawler summary and notes. Read-only: it only returns text and changes nothing. Same engine as POST /api/generate.

NameTypeReqDescription
agentsobject–Per-token overrides, e.g. {"GPTBot": "block"}. Tokens: letters, digits, "_", "." and "-", up to 64 characters (not "*"). At most 100.
allow_pathsarray–Paths to allow explicitly. Each path starts with "/" or "*" and has no whitespace or "#". At most 100.
categoriesobject–Action per crawler category. Omitted categories get no group of their own.
custom_rulesstring–Extra robots.txt lines appended after validation (max 20000 bytes).
datestring–Date for the header comment (YYYY-MM-DD). Default: today (UTC).
defaultstring–Policy for "User-agent: *" (default allow).
disallow_pathsarray–Paths to disallow for "*" and for allowed AI groups. Each path starts with "/" or "*" and has no whitespace or "#". At most 100.
sitemapstring–A single sitemap URL (alternative to sitemaps).
sitemapsarray–Absolute http(s) sitemap URLs. At most 20.
NameTypeReqDescription
notesarrayyes–
personal_agents_notestring––
robots_txtstringyes–
summaryarrayyes–

No examples provided.

list_crawlers ~97

Return RobotsGate's AI crawler registry: each crawler's robots.txt token, operator, category (training, dataset, search, user_fetch or other), whether the operator says it respects robots.txt, and a link to the operator's documentation, plus unverified entries and notes. Read-only, no network access. Same data as GET /api/crawlers.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystring–Optional: only crawlers in this category.
NameTypeReqDescription
categoriesobjectyes–
crawlersarrayyes–
generatedstring––
schema_versioninteger––
unverifiedarray––

No examples provided.

validate_robots ~128

Validate robots.txt text against RFC 9309 and report errors, warnings and, for one URL path, which registry AI crawlers are allowed or blocked and by which rule. Read-only, no network access. Same engine as POST /api/validate. Up to 50,000 characters over MCP (the whole JSON-RPC request must also fit in 64 KB); for larger files use POST /api/validate or check_site.

NameTypeReqDescription
pathstring–URL path to test, starting with "/" (default "/").
robots_txtstringyesThe robots.txt file content.
NameTypeReqDescription
ai_crawlersarrayyes–
diagnosticsobject––
errorsarrayyes–
infoarray––
pathstring––
personal_agentsobject––
statsobject––
validbooleanyes–
warningsarrayyes–

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the RobotsGate MCP server?

RobotsGate is a hosted endpoint at https://robotsgate.mike-tusa.workers.dev/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · robotsgate.mike-tusa.workers.dev

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http dev-workers-mike-tusa-robotsgate-robotsgate 'https://robotsgate.mike-tusa.workers.dev/mcp'
Common questions

What is the RobotsGate MCP server?

RobotsGate is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as dev.workers.mike-tusa.robotsgate/robotsgate. Generate, validate and check robots.txt rules for AI crawlers. Free; optional Pro key. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://robotsgate.mike-tusa.workers.dev/mcp).

Is the RobotsGate MCP server safe to use?

RobotsGate scores 74 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the RobotsGate MCP server expose?

RobotsGate exposes 4 tools: list_crawlers, generate_robots, validate_robots, check_site. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 689 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the RobotsGate MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to RobotsGate without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the RobotsGate MCP server still maintained?

RobotsGate is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.