Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

FHI MCP Server Security Audit

REMOTE · POLISHED-TRUTH-C514.FHI-LLC-1118.WORKERS.DEV

Free payment guide and Base-USDC x402 MCP security, package, domain, and SEC tools.

+4 this week 63 Trust /100

Last scanned (5 hours ago)

Scores higher than 46% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 17 Oct 2026.

Category Security

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security46
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability69
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 543 tokens (~77/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management47
  • Stability observed for 14 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage67
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 17 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 15 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 13 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 12 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 10 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 7 Oct 26 +1
    • Schema quality: 443 → 543 ▼ functional
    • New tool “mcp_change_evidence” functional
  • 4 Oct 26 +1
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 3 Oct 26 56

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 17 Oct 2026 · Probed https://polished-truth-c514.fhi-llc-1118.workers.dev/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=fhi-llc-1118.workers.dev CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 29 Sept 2026 28 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 501990a7ec0bc1067027edfbd7be4316b42
SANs: *.fhi-llc-1118.workers.dev, fhi-llc-1118.workers.dev
CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of polished-truth-c514.fhi-llc-1118.workers.dev. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
dev. present 60074 8 Verified
workers.dev. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://polished-truth-c514.fhi-llc-1118.workers.dev/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://polished-truth-c514.fhi-llc-1118.workers.dev/mcp Inconclusive 406
MCP tools · 7 exposed · ~543 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
domain_change_evidence ~60

Stateful DNS, CAA, and certificate-transparency monitoring for a public domain. The first call establishes a baseline; later calls return evidence changes and certificate-expiry signals. ($0.01 USDC on Base)

NameTypeReqDescription
domainstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

mcp_change_evidence ~100

Stateful live remote-MCP monitor for tool-rug-pull and tool-poisoning risk. Establishes an endpoint baseline, then detects added or removed tools, altered tool descriptions, risk-score changes, and newly observed high-risk capability signals before an agent reconnects or pays. Unlike a manifest diff, it fetches the live endpoint and retains the prior observation. ($0.003 USDC on Base)

NameTypeReqDescription
serverUrlstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

mcp_payment_preflight ~98

MCP server security audit before an agent connects or pays: probes initialize and tools/list, then returns an ALLOW, CAUTION, or BLOCK risk score for command, filesystem, or wallet capabilities; prompt-injection or data-exfiltration signals; permissive JSON-schema inputs; missing HSTS; and a large tool surface. Does not execute tools. ($0.01 USDC on Base)

NameTypeReqDescription
serverUrlstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

mcp_vendor_due_diligence ~107

One decision-ready due-diligence dossier before an agent adopts or pays an MCP vendor: live MCP metadata and tool-risk preflight, DNS/CAA/certificate evidence, plus optional SEC material-filing evidence for a public company. Does not execute vendor tools or certify safety. ($0.10 USDC on Base)

NameTypeReqDescription
cikstring––
mcpUrlstringyes–
sincestring––
tickerstring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

package_install_preflight ~81

npm or PyPI install preflight: blocks missing packages, detects near-name typosquats when an expected name is supplied, and checks OSV advisories. ($0.003 USDC on Base)

NameTypeReqDescription
ecosystemstringyes–
expectedNamestring––
namestringyes–
versionstring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

payment_info ~30

Free guide to the FHI MCP tools, Base-USDC x402 payment flow, and per-tool prices.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

sec_material_event_delta ~67

New SEC 8-K, 6-K, and late-filing evidence since a cursor date; accepts a ticker or CIK. ($0.01 USDC on Base)

NameTypeReqDescription
cikstring––
sincestringyes–
tickerstring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the FHI MCP Server Security Audit server?

FHI MCP Server Security Audit is a hosted endpoint at https://polished-truth-c514.fhi-llc-1118.workers.dev/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · polished-truth-c514.fhi-llc-1118.workers.dev

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http dev-workers-fhi-llc-1118-polished-truth-c514-fhi 'https://polished-truth-c514.fhi-llc-1118.workers.dev/mcp'
Common questions

What is the FHI MCP Server Security Audit server?

FHI MCP Server Security Audit is listed in the public MCP registry as dev.workers.fhi-llc-1118.polished-truth-c514/fhi-x402-secur…. Free payment guide and Base-USDC x402 MCP security, package, domain, and SEC tools. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://polished-truth-c514.fhi-llc-1118.workers.dev/mcp).

Is the FHI MCP Server Security Audit server safe to use?

FHI MCP Server Security Audit scores 63 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the FHI MCP Server Security Audit server expose?

FHI MCP Server Security Audit exposes 7 tools: payment_info, domain_change_evidence, package_install_preflight, sec_material_event_delta, mcp_payment_preflight, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 543 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the FHI MCP Server Security Audit server require authentication?

No. We connected to FHI MCP Server Security Audit without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the FHI MCP Server Security Audit server still maintained?

FHI MCP Server Security Audit is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 17 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.