Awardtide Recompete Radar
REMOTE · AWARDTIDE.CYBERMAXTOOLS.COM
Expiring US federal contracts MCP: recompete search by NAICS/agency. Free first 10; $29/mo.
Available components
Last scanned (9 hours ago)
Scores higher than 59% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 18 Oct 2026.
Category Finance and Payments
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security74
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability61
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 326 tokens (~326/item across 1 items; 1 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability check failed: schema churn in the 9 days we've observed: 0 tool removals, 1 breaking changes, 0 auth/transport breaks, 0 additions. See how to fix → Fail
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 1 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 2 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 12 Oct 26 −1
- Stability: 0.03 → fail ▼ security
- A breaking change shipped without a version bump: still 1.0.0 ▼ security
- “search_recompetes” made “naics” required, so existing callers break ▼ functional
- “search_recompetes” reworded the description of “naics” cosmetic
- 10 Oct 26 +1
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 9 Oct 26 69
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 18 Oct 2026 · Probed https://awardtide.cybermaxtools.com/mcp?via=mcp-registry
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=cybermaxtools.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 3 Oct 2026 | 1 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 7a9e40fd991cc06813299fbf542850ff |
| SANs: cybermaxtools.com, awardtide.cybermaxtools.com, *.awardtide.cybermaxtools.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of awardtide.cybermaxtools.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| cybermaxtools.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://awardtide.cybermaxtools.com/mcp?via=mcp-registry | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://awardtide.cybermaxtools.com/mcp?via=mcp-registry | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://awardtide.cybermaxtools.com/mcp?via=mcp-registry |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
search_recompetes Awardtide: search expiring federal contracts ~243
Search US federal contracts ($1M+) ending within 12 months, likely to be re-competed. Returns count, total potential value and the first 10 matches (all rows with a Radar Pro key). Data: USAspending.gov.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| agency | string | – | Agency slugs, comma-separated (see /api/meta), e.g. department-of-defense |
| key | string | – | Optional Radar Pro key: every matching row instead of the first 10 |
| max | number | – | Maximum value in USD |
| min | number | – | Minimum value in USD |
| months | integer | – | Only contracts whose current end date is within this many months (1-12) |
| naics | string | yes | NAICS codes, comma-separated (3-6 digits), e.g. 541512. Pass "" to search by agency only. |
| q | string | – | Incumbent name contains |
| setaside | string | – | Set-aside text to match, e.g. 8(a), SDVOSB, WOSB, HUBZone |
| state | string | – | Two-letter states of performance, comma-separated |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Awardtide Recompete Radar MCP server?
Awardtide Recompete Radar is a hosted endpoint at https://awardtide.cybermaxtools.com/mcp?via=mcp-registry, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · awardtide.cybermaxtools.com
claude mcp add --transport http dev-workers-cybermax-tools-cybermax-awardtide 'https://awardtide.cybermaxtools.com/mcp?via=mcp-registry'
What is the Awardtide Recompete Radar MCP server?
Awardtide Recompete Radar is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as dev.workers.cybermax-tools.cybermax/awardtide. Expiring US federal contracts MCP: recompete search by NAICS/agency. Free first 10; $29/mo. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://awardtide.cybermaxtools.com/mcp?via=mcp-registry).
Is the Awardtide Recompete Radar MCP server safe to use?
Awardtide Recompete Radar scores 69 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Awardtide Recompete Radar MCP server expose?
Awardtide Recompete Radar exposes 1 tool: search_recompetes. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 243 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Awardtide Recompete Radar MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Awardtide Recompete Radar without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Awardtide Recompete Radar MCP server still maintained?
Awardtide Recompete Radar is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 18 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.