Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

PDF to Markdown

REMOTE · PDFMD.DEV

Convert public PDF links into Markdown with page counts and explicit excerpt limits.

Available components

+4 this week 82 Trust /100

Last scanned (19 hours ago)

Scores higher than 88% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 23 Oct 2026.

Category Documents and Files

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability75
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 224 tokens (~224/item across 1 items; 1 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management67
  • Stability observed for 20 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage86
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 50% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 1 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 2 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 19 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 17 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 16 Oct 26 0
    • Tool “convert_pdf_url” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Schema quality: pass → fail ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 0% → 50% ▲ functional
    • “convert_pdf_url” added an optional parameter “format” cosmetic
  • 15 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 13 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 12 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 23 Oct 2026 · Probed https://pdfmd.dev/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=*.pdfmd.dev CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 20 Sept 2026 19 Dec 2026 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 609e2d609ea3e293ff9dda7ee9874ca17ff
SANs: *.pdfmd.dev, pdfmd.dev
CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of pdfmd.dev. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
dev. present 60074 8 Verified
pdfmd.dev. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000
content-security-policy default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://www.google.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data: blob: https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net https://ad.doubleclick.net https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com https://www.google.com; font-src 'self'; connect-src 'self' https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.googleadservices.com https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net https://ad.doubleclick.net https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com https://www.google.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://region1.google-analytics.com https://hello-30155--pdfmd-worker-direct-ocr-endpoint.modal.run; frame-src 'self' https://www.googletagmanager.com; worker-src 'self'; object-src 'none'; base-uri 'self'; form-action 'self' https://checkout.stripe.com https://billing.stripe.com; frame-ancestors 'none'
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options DENY
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://pdfmd.dev/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://pdfmd.dev/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://pdfmd.dev/mcp
MCP tools · 1 exposed · ~134 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
convert_pdf_url ~134

Use when someone asks to read, quote or summarize a PDF that sits at a public web link, or wants it as Markdown or HTML for research or a coding project. Returns extracted text, page and table counts, and whether scanned pages were found. It does not OCR scanned pages and it cannot open private links or local files. The reply holds at most 20,000 Markdown characters and marks a longer result as an excerpt; the whole PDF counts toward the API page allowance.

NameTypeReqDescription
formatstring–markdown (default), html or both. html is a fragment you can embed.
urlstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
converted_atstring––
docs_urlstringyes–
errorstring––
htmlstring––
http_statusinteger––
markdownstring––
messagestringyes–
pagesinteger––
parser_versionstring––
remaining_pagesstring––
retry_afterstring––
returned_charactersinteger––
scanned_pagesinteger––
source_urlstring––
statusstringyes–
tablesinteger––
total_charactersinteger––
truncatedboolean––
warningsarray––

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the PDF to Markdown MCP server?

PDF to Markdown is a hosted endpoint at https://pdfmd.dev/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · pdfmd.dev

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http dev-pdfmd-pdf-to-markdown 'https://pdfmd.dev/mcp'
Common questions

What is the PDF to Markdown MCP server?

PDF to Markdown is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as dev.pdfmd/pdf-to-markdown. Convert public PDF links into Markdown with page counts and explicit excerpt limits. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://pdfmd.dev/mcp).

Is the PDF to Markdown MCP server safe to use?

PDF to Markdown scores 82 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the PDF to Markdown MCP server expose?

PDF to Markdown exposes 1 tool: convert_pdf_url. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 134 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the PDF to Markdown MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to PDF to Markdown without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the PDF to Markdown MCP server still maintained?

PDF to Markdown is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 23 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.