Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

ScrapeMole Pkgs

REMOTE · PKGS.SCRAPEMOLE.WORKERS.DEV

Pay-per-call x402 npm and PyPI package metadata, versions, search, download counts.

68 Trust /100

Last scanned (5 hours ago)

Scores higher than 58% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 18 Oct 2026.

Category Code Search and Documentation

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability75
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 830 tokens (~138/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management20
  • Stability observed for 6 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 18 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 15 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 13 Oct 26 +1
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 12 Oct 26 65

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 18 Oct 2026 · Probed https://pkgs.scrapemole.workers.dev/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=scrapemole.workers.dev CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 11 Oct 2026 9 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 6cb5e08b3ab5152b2cf983c23c8751537e4
SANs: *.scrapemole.workers.dev, scrapemole.workers.dev
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of pkgs.scrapemole.workers.dev. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
dev. present 60074 8 Verified
workers.dev. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://pkgs.scrapemole.workers.dev/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://pkgs.scrapemole.workers.dev/mcp Inconclusive 405
MCP tools · 6 exposed · ~754 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
npm_package ~126

Use when you need the public npm registry card for a package (scoped or unscoped): returns description, homepage, bugs URL, repository, license, keywords, maintainers as names only (emails stripped), number of versions, latest dist-tag version, created/modified times, and last-week download count from the official downloads API. Private packages are not supported. Paid tool: x402 USDC on Base, $0.002 per successful call; call without payment to receive the PaymentRequired object.

NameTypeReqDescription
namestringyesnpm package name, optionally scoped (@scope/name).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

npm_search ~107

Use to discover npm packages by keyword or name: returns up to 20 hits with name, version, description, keywords, date, and the registry search score. Publisher and maintainer emails are never returned (names/usernames only when present). Paid tool: x402 USDC on Base, $0.003 per successful call; call without payment to receive the PaymentRequired object.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitstring–Max results (1-20).
qstringyesSearch text.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

npm_version ~123

Use when you need the exact published artifact for an npm version: dependencies, optionalDependencies, peerDependencies, bundledDependencies, engines, os/cpu, dist (tarball URL, integrity, shasum, unpacked size), and the version publish time. Give "latest" as version to resolve the current dist-tag. Paid tool: x402 USDC on Base, $0.002 per successful call; call without payment to receive the PaymentRequired object.

NameTypeReqDescription
namestringyesnpm package name.
versionstringyesExact version or "latest".

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

pypi_project ~109

Use when you need the public PyPI project card: summary, home_page, project_urls, license, requires_python, a subset of classifiers, requires_dist (capped), current version, and yank status. Author/maintainer emails are omitted or redacted; only display names remain when present. Paid tool: x402 USDC on Base, $0.002 per successful call; call without payment to receive the PaymentRequired object.

NameTypeReqDescription
namestringyesPyPI project name.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

pypi_release ~128

Use when you need the published artifacts for a specific PyPI version: each file with filename, packagetype (sdist/bdist_wheel…), size, upload time, yank flags, digests (sha256/blake2b/md5) and download URL. Give "latest" as version to use the project's current version. Paid tool: x402 USDC on Base, $0.002 per successful call; call without payment to receive the PaymentRequired object.

NameTypeReqDescription
namestringyesPyPI project name.
versionstringyesExact version or "latest".

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

pypi_search ~161

Use when you have a likely PyPI project name (or a few tokens) and need to resolve it to live projects: tries the query as-is, PEP 503 normalization (lowercase, [-_.] → -), and hyphen/underscore/dot variants, then returns up to "limit" matching projects with summary, version, requires_python and license. This is name resolution, not full-text discovery — prefer exact package names when known. Author emails are redacted. Paid tool: x402 USDC on Base, $0.003 per successful call; call without payment to receive the PaymentRequired object.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitstring–Max results (1-20).
qstringyesProject name or name-like query.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the ScrapeMole Pkgs MCP server?

ScrapeMole Pkgs is a hosted endpoint at https://pkgs.scrapemole.workers.dev/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · pkgs.scrapemole.workers.dev

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http dev-pages-scrapemole-pkgs 'https://pkgs.scrapemole.workers.dev/mcp'
Common questions

What is the ScrapeMole Pkgs MCP server?

ScrapeMole Pkgs is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as dev.pages.scrapemole/pkgs. Pay-per-call x402 npm and PyPI package metadata, versions, search, download counts. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://pkgs.scrapemole.workers.dev/mcp).

Is the ScrapeMole Pkgs MCP server safe to use?

ScrapeMole Pkgs scores 68 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the ScrapeMole Pkgs MCP server expose?

ScrapeMole Pkgs exposes 6 tools: npm_package, npm_version, npm_search, pypi_project, pypi_release, pypi_search. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 754 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the ScrapeMole Pkgs MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to ScrapeMole Pkgs without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the ScrapeMole Pkgs MCP server still maintained?

ScrapeMole Pkgs is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 18 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.