Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

MCP security checks — WARDEN and HISTOR

REMOTE · MODELMARKET.DEV

Scan MCP tool definitions for poisoning, look up server history, count tool-list tokens. Free.

Available components

71 Trust /100

Last scanned (16 hours ago)

Scores higher than 61% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 22 Oct 2026.

Category Security

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security74
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability69
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 572 tokens (~143/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management7
  • Stability observed for 2 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 22 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 20 Oct 26 70

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 22 Oct 2026 · Probed https://modelmarket.dev/tools/mcp/security

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=modelmarket.dev CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 29 Sept 2026 28 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 676c19725090b70834a37df124c11ac463f
SANs: modelmarket.dev, www.modelmarket.dev
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of modelmarket.dev. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
dev. present 60074 8 Verified
modelmarket.dev. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://modelmarket.dev/tools/mcp/security Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://modelmarket.dev/tools/mcp/security HTTPS enforced 301 https://modelmarket.dev/tools/mcp/security
MCP tools · 4 exposed · ~495 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
histor_check ~92

Look up an MCP server in HISTOR, a public append-only log of MCP tool sets: when its tool set was first pinned, how often it changed, and what the pattern scan found. HISTOR answers from its own observations and never contacts the server.

NameTypeReqDescription
endpointstring–https URL of the MCP server
namestring–Or its registry name, e.g. io.github.owner/server

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

tool_list_cost ~110

How many tokens an MCP server's tool list adds to every model request, what that costs per 1,000 requests, the heaviest tools, and where it sits among 18,204 packages and 16,170 remote servers. Send a tools/list or name a server HISTOR observes.

NameTypeReqDescription
serverstring–Or a server HISTOR observes: https endpoint, npm:<package>, pypi:<package> or registry name
toolsarray–A tools/list result

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

warden_scan ~110

Scan an MCP server's tools/list with WARDEN, the open-source MCP firewall: static rules and a threat list over every name, description, schema and annotation. Returns allow or block and each finding with its rule and severity. Quoted fragments of the scanned text are left out of the answer.

NameTypeReqDescription
serverobject–Optional {name, url} to label the verdict
toolsarrayyesThe server's tools/list result: [{name, description, inputSchema, ...}]

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

x402_check ~183

Check a signed x402 USDC payment before submitting it: recovers the EIP-712 signer, runs USDC's own checks and the seller's terms, and when the signature fails names the domain it was really made for (e.g. Base Sepolia's 'USDC' used on Base, where USDC is 'USD Coin').

NameTypeReqDescription
authorizationobject–Instead of x_payment: from, to, value, validAfter, validBefore, nonce
networkstring–With authorization: base, base-sepolia, … or eip155:<id>
requirementsobject–The 402's accepts entry: payTo, amount, asset, network
signaturestring–With authorization: the 65-byte hex signature
x_paymentstring–The X-PAYMENT header (base64)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the MCP security checks — WARDEN and HISTOR server?

MCP security checks — WARDEN and HISTOR is a hosted endpoint at https://modelmarket.dev/tools/mcp/security, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · modelmarket.dev

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http dev-modelmarket-mcp-security 'https://modelmarket.dev/tools/mcp/security'
Common questions

What is the MCP security checks — WARDEN and HISTOR server?

MCP security checks — WARDEN and HISTOR is listed in the public MCP registry as dev.modelmarket/mcp-security. Scan MCP tool definitions for poisoning, look up server history, count tool-list tokens. Free. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://modelmarket.dev/tools/mcp/security).

Is the MCP security checks — WARDEN and HISTOR server safe to use?

MCP security checks — WARDEN and HISTOR scores 71 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the MCP security checks — WARDEN and HISTOR server expose?

MCP security checks — WARDEN and HISTOR exposes 4 tools: warden_scan, histor_check, tool_list_cost, x402_check. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 495 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the MCP security checks — WARDEN and HISTOR server require authentication?

No. We connected to MCP security checks — WARDEN and HISTOR without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the MCP security checks — WARDEN and HISTOR server still maintained?

MCP security checks — WARDEN and HISTOR is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 22 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.