MantleKit Launch Planner
REMOTE · MCP.MANTLEKIT.DEV
Generate MantleKit setup plans and launch-ready SaaS blueprints from a product idea.
Available components
Last scanned (6 hours ago)
Scores higher than 98% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Developer Tools
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability87
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 805 tokens (~100/item across 8 items; 4 tools + 4 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Checks we ran (13)
- TLS certificate
- Authorization
- HTTPS
- HSTS header
- DNSSEC
- Transport
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)
- Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
- Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 4 Nov 26 −1
- Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
- 28 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 9 Sept 26 0
- Schema quality: good → excellent functional
- 26 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Aug 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 11 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://mcp.mantlekit.dev/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=*.mantlekit.dev | CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 30 Sept 2026 | 29 Dec 2026 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 67cf4773e72707de09b780aa0f6b792e935 |
| SANs: *.mantlekit.dev, mantlekit.dev | ||||||
| CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of mcp.mantlekit.dev. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Trust anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| dev. | DS published | 60074 | 8 | Verified |
| mantlekit.dev. | No DS | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000 |
| content-security-policy | default-src 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'none'; img-src 'self' data: blob: https:; font-src 'self' data: https://fonts.gstatic.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com https://embed.tawk.to https://*.tawk.to; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://js.stripe.com https://www.googletagmanager.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://app.lemonsqueezy.com https://checkout.polar.sh https://cdn.promotekit.com https://embed.tawk.to https://*.tawk.to; connect-src 'self' https: wss: https://cdn.promotekit.com https://embed.tawk.to https://*.tawk.to wss://*.tawk.to; frame-src 'self' https://js.stripe.com https://hooks.stripe.com https://www.youtube.com https://youtube.com https://www.youtube-nocookie.com https://player.vimeo.com https://app.lemonsqueezy.com https://checkout.polar.sh https://embed.tawk.to https://*.tawk.to; form-action 'self' https://checkout.stripe.com https://app.lemonsqueezy.com https://checkout.polar.sh; upgrade-insecure-r |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://mcp.mantlekit.dev/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://mcp.mantlekit.dev/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://mcp.mantlekit.dev/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
compare_build_vs_custom Compare MantleKit vs Custom Build ~209
Estimate where MantleKit saves time versus building from scratch for a SaaS project.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| appIdea | string | yes | Plain-English description of the app idea. |
| commercialUse | boolean | – | Whether client delivery or commercial usage matters. |
| estimatedFeatures | array | – | Major product features expected in the first release. |
| experienceLevel | string | – | Builder profile used to estimate fit and time saved. |
| needsAdmin | boolean | – | Whether a serious admin/dashboard surface is needed. |
| needsAuth | boolean | – | Whether authentication is needed. |
| needsCms | boolean | – | Whether structured content management is needed. |
| needsEcommerce | boolean | – | Whether products, orders, and customers are needed. |
| needsPayments | boolean | – | Whether hosted payments or checkout are needed. |
| needsSupportTickets | boolean | – | Whether support ticketing is needed. |
| teamSize | integer | – | Approximate team size working on the product. |
| timelineWeeks | integer | – | Target launch timeline in weeks. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| customWorkRemaining | array | yes | – |
| fitAssessment | string | yes | – |
| links | object | yes | – |
| mantleKitCovers | array | yes | – |
| recommendedNextStep | string | yes | – |
| recommendedTier | string | yes | – |
| roughTimeSaved | string | yes | – |
| summary | string | yes | – |
| why | array | yes | – |
No examples provided.
generate_project_blueprint Generate Project Blueprint ~243
Turn an app idea into a launch-ready MantleKit project blueprint with pages, dashboard sections, entities, and MVP scope.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| adminNeeds | boolean | – | Whether the product needs dashboard/admin workflows. |
| appName | string | yes | Name of the planned product. |
| authRequired | boolean | – | Whether users need accounts, login, or protected areas. |
| commercialUse | boolean | – | Whether this is for client delivery or commercial agency use. |
| contentNeeds | boolean | – | Whether the product needs CMS, blog, docs, or SEO content. |
| coreFeatures | array | – | Core user-facing features to include in the MVP. |
| ecommerceNeeds | boolean | – | Whether the product needs products, orders, carts, or fulfilment. |
| oneLineIdea | string | yes | Short description of the product. |
| paymentsRequired | boolean | – | Whether the app needs checkout, subscriptions, or paid plans. |
| supportNeeds | boolean | – | Whether the product needs tickets, chat, or support workflows. |
| targetAudience | string | – | Primary audience or buyer segment for the product. |
| themePreference | string | – | Desired MantleKit theme style or brand direction. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| appSummary | string | yes | – |
| installCommand | string | yes | – |
| links | object | yes | – |
| recommendedLaunchPlan | array | yes | – |
| recommendedMantleKitFeatures | array | yes | – |
| recommendedMvpScope | array | yes | – |
| recommendedTheme | string | yes | – |
| recommendedTier | string | yes | – |
| suggestedDashboardSections | array | yes | – |
| suggestedDatabaseEntities | array | yes | – |
| suggestedPages | array | yes | – |
No examples provided.
match_theme Match MantleKit Theme ~80
Recommend the best MantleKit theme for a product type, audience, and brand direction.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| appType | string | yes | Type of product being built. |
| audience | string | – | Intended audience or buyer segment. |
| brandAdjectives | array | – | Brand adjectives or vibe words. |
| stylePreference | string | – | Optional style direction or visual preference. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| alternatives | array | yes | – |
| confidence | string | yes | – |
| links | object | yes | – |
| previewUrl | string | yes | – |
| recommendedTheme | string | yes | – |
| summary | string | yes | – |
| why | array | yes | – |
No examples provided.
recommend_setup Recommend MantleKit Setup ~199
Recommend the best MantleKit tier, theme, and built-in feature set for a new app idea.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| appIdea | string | yes | Plain-English description of the app idea. |
| businessType | string | – | Business model or category, for example B2B SaaS or agency. |
| commercialUse | boolean | – | Whether client delivery or commercial usage matters. |
| needsAdmin | boolean | – | Whether a serious admin/dashboard surface is needed. |
| needsAuth | boolean | – | Whether authentication is needed. |
| needsCms | boolean | – | Whether structured content management is needed. |
| needsEcommerce | boolean | – | Whether products, orders, and customers are needed. |
| needsPayments | boolean | – | Whether hosted payments or checkout are needed. |
| needsSupportTickets | boolean | – | Whether support ticketing is needed. |
| preferredThemeStyle | string | – | Desired visual direction or brand adjectives. |
| targetAudience | string | – | Primary audience for the product. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| alternatives | array | yes | – |
| assumptions | array | yes | – |
| confidence | string | yes | – |
| installCommand | string | yes | – |
| links | object | yes | – |
| nextSteps | array | yes | – |
| recommendedFeatures | array | yes | – |
| recommendedTheme | string | yes | – |
| recommendedTier | string | yes | – |
| summary | string | yes | – |
| why | array | yes | – |
No examples provided.
How do I install the MantleKit Launch Planner MCP server?
MantleKit Launch Planner is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.mantlekit.dev/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · mcp.mantlekit.dev
claude mcp add --transport http dev-mantlekit-launch-planner 'https://mcp.mantlekit.dev/mcp'
What is the MantleKit Launch Planner MCP server?
MantleKit Launch Planner is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as dev.mantlekit/launch-planner. Generate MantleKit setup plans and launch-ready SaaS blueprints from a product idea. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.mantlekit.dev/mcp).
Is the MantleKit Launch Planner MCP server safe to use?
MantleKit Launch Planner scores 90 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the MantleKit Launch Planner MCP server expose?
MantleKit Launch Planner exposes 4 tools: recommend_setup, generate_project_blueprint, match_theme, compare_build_vs_custom. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 731 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the MantleKit Launch Planner MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to MantleKit Launch Planner without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the MantleKit Launch Planner MCP server still maintained?
MantleKit Launch Planner is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What did VerifyMCP test on the MantleKit Launch Planner MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on MantleKit Launch Planner, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.