Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Verify a Company

REMOTE · HATCHLOOP.DEV · SCANNED OCT 5

Verify a company on GLEIF LEI and SEC EDGAR, screen sanctions. No key; quota-free data.

Available components

+1 this week 86 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security74
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability86
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 1039 tokens (~86/item across 12 items; 7 tools + 5 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage92
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 75% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 9 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Install

How do I install the Verify a Company MCP server?

Verify a Company is a hosted endpoint at https://hatchloop.dev/mcp/company-verification, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · hatchloop.dev

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http dev-hatchloop-company-verification 'https://hatchloop.dev/mcp/company-verification'
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "dev-hatchloop-company-verification": {
      "url": "https://hatchloop.dev/mcp/company-verification"
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "dev-hatchloop-company-verification": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://hatchloop.dev/mcp/company-verification"
    }
  }
}
# ~/.codex/config.toml
[mcp_servers.dev-hatchloop-company-verification]
url = "https://hatchloop.dev/mcp/company-verification"
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "dev-hatchloop-company-verification": {
      "type": "remote",
      "url": "https://hatchloop.dev/mcp/company-verification",
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add dev-hatchloop-company-verification --url 'https://hatchloop.dev/mcp/company-verification' --transport streamable-http
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  dev-hatchloop-company-verification:
    url: "https://hatchloop.dev/mcp/company-verification"
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "dev-hatchloop-company-verification": {
      "Transport": "http",
      "Url": "https://hatchloop.dev/mcp/company-verification"
    }
  }
}
# add to Vellum
assistant mcp add dev-hatchloop-company-verification -t streamable-http -u 'https://hatchloop.dev/mcp/company-verification'
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "dev-hatchloop-company-verification": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://hatchloop.dev/mcp/company-verification"
    }
  }
}

The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Oct 26 0
    • Tool “screen_sanctions” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • The server no longer declares the “logging” capability functional
    • MCP protocol: Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28). functional
    • MCP protocol version: 2025-11-25 → 2026-07-28 functional
    • “screen_sanctions” reworded the description of “name” cosmetic
  • 2 Oct 26 −3
    • HSTS header: pass → fail ▼ security
  • 1 Oct 26 +1
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 30 Sept 26 +3
    • HSTS header: fail → pass ▲ security
  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 27 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Sept 26 +1
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 23 Sept 26 +1
    • Tool “screen_sanctions” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 6 Oct 2026 · Probed https://hatchloop.dev/mcp/company-verification

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=hatchloop.dev CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 9 Sept 2026 8 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 585b21c0597f38a72ae9ec226ee06a39406
SANs: hatchloop.dev
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of hatchloop.dev. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
dev. present 60074 8 Verified
hatchloop.dev. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
content-security-policy default-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' data: blob: https:

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://hatchloop.dev/mcp/company-verification Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://hatchloop.dev/mcp/company-verification HTTPS enforced 308 https://hatchloop.dev/mcp/company-verification
MCP tools · 7 exposed · ~717 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_outcome ~33

Retrieve the final OutcomeReceipt for a completed operation. [free, no key]

NameTypeReqDescription
operation_idstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_status ~36

Query the current state of any in-flight async operation by operation_id. [free, no key]

NameTypeReqDescription
operation_idstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

lookup_us_contracts ~133

Search US federal contract awards by company (recipient) name using the free USASpending.gov public API. Returns the top awards sorted by dollar amount: award ID, recipient name, award amount USD, awarding agency, NAICS code/description, and period of performance. Zero upstream cost, no key required. Data covers 2020-2026 procurement contracts. [free, no key]

NameTypeReqDescription
company_namestringyesCompany or recipient name to search for in US federal contract awards (e.g.…
max_resultsinteger–Maximum number of contract awards to return (sorted by award amount…

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

preview_cost ~95

Return an expected cost estimate, latency estimate, and success-probability estimate for a proposed call before execution. Returns the exact price when it is fixed, and a min/max range when the cost depends on channel or outcome. It does not promise an accuracy percentage - check cost_range. [free, no key]

NameTypeReqDescription
operationstringyes–
paramsobjectyesThe same request body you would pass to the operation

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

screen_sanctions ~184

Free screening of a name/entity (Latin or Arabic script) against sanctions lists: OFAC SDN (US Treasury), EU consolidated list (European Commission), UK Sanctions List (FCDO). THE UN CONSOLIDATED LIST IS NOT SCREENED -- no licence permits redistribution. Never fabricates a match or clear: check lists_screened; reason_code 'partial_screening' (never 'clear') if any source failed. [free, no key]

NameTypeReqDescription
countrystring–Optional ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country code or country name (e.g. 'IR', 'Iran').…
namestringyesName of the person or entity to screen, in Latin or Arabic script, e.g. 'Kim…
typestring–Optional entity type hint. 'person' for individuals, 'entity' for…

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

self_test ~54

Service health probe: runs 6 internal checks and reports how many passed. Confirms the server is up and responding - it does NOT probe each tool individually. Use to verify connectivity before production use. [free, no key]

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

verify_company_record ~182

Free, live lookup of a company official registry record. Queries the GLEIF global LEI registry (primary, 2.6 million legal entities worldwide) and SEC EDGAR (US public companies) to return the official legal name, LEI, entity status, jurisdiction, registered address, and registry authority. Never fabricates: if the company is not found in these free registries, returns an honest not_found with the sources that were queried. [free, no key]

NameTypeReqDescription
countrystring–Optional ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country filter (e.g. US, DE, GB). Narrows GLEIF…
leistring–Optional 20-character Legal Entity Identifier for a direct, precise lookup.
namestringyesLegal company name to look up, e.g. Apple Inc or Volkswagen AG.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the Verify a Company MCP server?

Verify a Company is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as dev.hatchloop/company-verification. Verify a company on GLEIF LEI and SEC EDGAR, screen sanctions. No key; quota-free data. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://hatchloop.dev/mcp/company-verification).

Is the Verify a Company MCP server safe to use?

Verify a Company scores 86 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Verify a Company MCP server expose?

Verify a Company exposes 7 tools: get_status, get_outcome, preview_cost, self_test, verify_company_record, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 717 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Verify a Company MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Verify a Company without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Verify a Company MCP server still maintained?

Verify a Company is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.