Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

hackshop

REMOTE · WWW.HACKSHOP.DEV · 2 COMPONENTS

Plan and build a physical body for your AI agent: boards, parts list, assembly and pairing.

+2 this week 87 Trust /100

Last scanned (8 hours ago)

Scores higher than 94% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category IoT and Hardware

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability81
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 1573 tokens (~104/item across 15 items; 10 tools + 5 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage83
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 41% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 10 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 12 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 3 Nov 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +7
    • Authorization: unverified → partial ▲ security
    • Tool “intake_gadget” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “find_firmware_playbooks” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “plan_gadget” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Schema quality: fail → pass ▲ functional
  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://www.hackshop.dev/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=*.hackshop.dev CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 9 Oct 2026 7 Jan 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 6f60b109f6c0cb71ce742219b726bc8ff97
SANs: *.hackshop.dev, hackshop.dev
CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of www.hackshop.dev. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
dev. present 60074 8 Verified
hackshop.dev. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000
content-security-policy frame-ancestors 'self'
x-content-type-options nosniff
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://www.hackshop.dev/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://www.hackshop.dev/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://www.hackshop.dev/mcp
MCP tools · 10 exposed · ~1,179 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
assess_hackability ~77

Look up a device by id, exact name or substring and return hackability, brick risk, firmware links, curated firmware playbooks, community size, build page and agent platform support. Input: `device_name` 1-200 chars.

NameTypeReqDescription
device_namestringyesDevice name or id, 1-200 characters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

check_firmware_compatibility ~69

Fail-closed compatibility check for one firmware playbook. Required model, codename, revision, SoC or firmware identifiers must exactly match a curated target; missing facts return unknown and mismatches return unsupported.

NameTypeReqDescription
observedobjectyes–
playbook_idstringyes–

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

find_firmware_playbooks ~82

Find curated owner-authorized firmware, local-protocol and cloud-replacement playbooks. Results rank less-invasive paths first and contain research guidance rather than device compatibility approval.

NameTypeReqDescription
device_idstring––
interventionstring––
limitnumber––
querystringyes–
risk_tolerancestring––

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

find_reverse_engineering_examples ~173

Search Hackshop's curated hardware reverse-engineering examples and research methods. With no query, returns the newest dated examples first. Evidence labels distinguish reproduced work, documented implementations, author demos and analysis methods; they do not imply compatibility with similar-looking hardware.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystring––
evidencestring––
limitnumber––
max_device_price_usdnumber–Maximum lowest-listed device price in USD; unknown prices excluded. Accessories, host, shipping and tax are extra; availability is returned separately.
methodstring––
querystring–Optional case-insensitive search across title, device, exact models, summary, outcome and tags. Empty returns the latest examples.
use_casestring–Filter source-backed design starters by intended use.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_build_plan ~93

Return the complete deterministic build plan for a catalog device id: difficulty, board-specific flash warnings, parts, shopping list with buy_options, prices checked date and purchase policy, steps, machine-readable assembly with verify checks, commands, links, caveats and an agent-ready brief. Input: `device_id` 1-200 chars.

NameTypeReqDescription
device_idstringyesCatalog device id, 1-200 characters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_firmware_playbook ~52

Return a curated firmware playbook with exact targets, prerequisites, backups, recovery, independent risk axes, sources, validation checks and the human-only destructive-action boundary.

NameTypeReqDescription
playbook_idstringyes–

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

intake_gadget ~37

Return four hardware-planning intake questions covering placement, interaction, room sensing and budget, with answer options and their planning meanings. No input.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

plan_gadget ~445

Deterministically plan a physical body for an AI agent using Meta Muse boards. Partial intake answers produce remaining questions and an intake completion status. Inputs: `idea` 3-2000 chars (optional when `answers` or `needs` are given); `answers` {size, interaction, sensing, budget} using the intake option values; `platform` one of muse-esp32, muse-linux, any (default any); `budget_usd` number greater than 0, up to 100000; `owned_device_ids` up to 50 catalog ids; `needs` values: voice, screen, images, touch, camera, air-sensors, e-ink, battery, round, home-tunnel, big-screen, compute, linux; `size` one of pocket, desk, wall, hidden, any (default any); `limit` 1-5 (default 3). Boards that meet the hard needs and the budget rank first, cheapest first. Returns fit, notes, warnings, intake status, questions, picks with difficulty, terms and next steps.

NameTypeReqDescription
answersobject–The human's intake answers, by question id, using the option values from intake_gadget.
budget_usdnumber–Optional hardware budget in USD. Must be greater than 0, max 100000.
ideastring–Gadget idea or use case, 3-2000 characters. Optional when `answers` or `needs` are given.
limitnumber–Number of picks to return: 1-5, default 3.
needsarray–Optional explicit needs. Allowed: voice, screen, images, touch, camera, air-sensors, e-ink, battery, round, home-tunnel, big-screen, compute, linux.
owned_device_idsarray–Catalog device ids the user already owns. Max 50.
platformstring–Platform filter: muse-esp32, muse-linux, or any. Default any.
sizestring–Preferred size or placement: pocket, desk, wall, hidden, any. Default any.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

prepare_firmware_job ~70

Prepare a non-executing firmware manifest after owner authorization and an exact compatibility match. Returns backup, recovery, sources, validation and stop points; never returns a flash command.

NameTypeReqDescription
observedobjectyes–
owner_authorizedbooleanyes–
playbook_idstringyes–

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

verify_firmware_artifact ~81

Compare a caller-supplied filename, source URL and SHA-256 with Hackshop's curated metadata. Hackshop does not fetch, upload or redistribute the artifact; absent hashes return unknown.

NameTypeReqDescription
filenamestringyes–
playbook_idstringyes–
sha256stringyes–
source_urlstringyes–

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the hackshop MCP server?

hackshop is a hosted endpoint at https://www.hackshop.dev/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · www.hackshop.dev

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http dev-hackshop-hackshop-mcp 'https://www.hackshop.dev/mcp'
Common questions

What is the hackshop MCP server?

hackshop is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as dev.hackshop/hackshop-mcp. Plan and build a physical body for your AI agent: boards, parts list, assembly and pairing. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.hackshop.dev/mcp).

Is the hackshop MCP server safe to use?

hackshop scores 87 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the hackshop MCP server expose?

hackshop exposes 10 tools: intake_gadget, plan_gadget, get_build_plan, assess_hackability, find_reverse_engineering_examples, and 5 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,179 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the hackshop MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to hackshop without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the hackshop MCP server still maintained?

hackshop is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.