Gemot Deliberation Server
REMOTE · GEMOT.DEV · 2 COMPONENTS · SCANNED SEP 27
Deliberation primitive for multi-agent coordination: cruxes, vote clustering, consensus.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security60
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 7 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root. View diagnostics → Pass
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability49
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 2447 tokens (~349/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage67
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
How do I install the Gemot Deliberation Server MCP server?
Gemot Deliberation Server is a hosted endpoint at https://gemot.dev/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · gemot.dev
claude mcp add --transport http dev-gemot-gemot 'https://gemot.dev/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"dev-gemot-gemot": {
"url": "https://gemot.dev/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"dev-gemot-gemot": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://gemot.dev/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.dev-gemot-gemot] url = "https://gemot.dev/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"dev-gemot-gemot": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://gemot.dev/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add dev-gemot-gemot --url 'https://gemot.dev/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
dev-gemot-gemot:
url: "https://gemot.dev/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"dev-gemot-gemot": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://gemot.dev/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add dev-gemot-gemot -t streamable-http -u 'https://gemot.dev/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"dev-gemot-gemot": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://gemot.dev/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 25 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 26 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Aug 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 11 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 8 Aug 26 0
- Schema quality: fair → poor functional
- New tool “account” functional
- 7 Aug 26 0
- Tool “admin” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- “decide” added an optional parameter “note” cosmetic
- “decide” added an optional parameter “dependent_commitment_id” cosmetic
- “decide” added an optional parameter “accessor_id” cosmetic
- “admin” added an optional parameter “agent_id” cosmetic
- “decide” added an optional parameter “kind” cosmetic
- 5 Aug 26 0
- Tool “deliberation” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “decide” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “participate” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- “deliberation” added an optional parameter “signature_policy” cosmetic
- “deliberation” added an optional parameter “principal_policy” cosmetic
- “analyze” added an optional parameter “options” cosmetic
- “analyze” added an optional parameter “option_votes” cosmetic
- “participate” added an optional parameter “principal_credential” cosmetic
- 31 Jul 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 27 Sept 2026 · Probed https://gemot.dev/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=gemot.dev | CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 24 Jul 2026 | 22 Oct 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 574f60c2ee0afc7711e60f20e57e568fcad |
| SANs: gemot.dev | ||||||
| CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC secure
Validation of gemot.dev. — Secure
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| dev. | present | 60074 | 8 | Verified |
| gemot.dev. | present | 27365 | 13 | Verified |
| gemot.dev. | Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| content-security-policy | default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com; font-src 'self' https://fonts.gstatic.com; img-src 'self' data:; connect-src 'self'; frame-ancestors 'none'; base-uri 'self'; form-action 'self' |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://gemot.dev/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://gemot.dev/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://gemot.dev/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
account ~137
Fund your gemot credit balance. Actions: - buy_credits: Top up THIS API key's balance over the ATXP/x402 rail (optional: pack, atxp_account_id, payment_credential). Call once with no payment_credential to receive a payment-required challenge (the x402 accepts to pay against), then call again with payment_credential set to the base64 X-PAYMENT settle credential. Credits are added only on a settled, on-chain-confirmed charge.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| action | string | yes | – |
| atxp_account_id | string | – | – |
| pack | string | – | – |
| payment_credential | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
admin ~160
Admin and audit tools. Actions: - report_abuse: Report abusive content (deliberation_id, reason) - get_audit_log: Get audit trail incl. tamper-evident log with proofs (deliberation_id) - list_templates: List available governance templates - get_votes: Get all votes (deliberation_id) - get_vote_state: Get your own agent's recorded votes to confirm they landed and whether each is marked relayed vs direct (deliberation_id, agent_id) - replica_pubkey: Get the server's BLS public key for offline proof verification
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| action | string | yes | – |
| agent_id | string | – | – |
| deliberation_id | string | – | – |
| reason | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
analyze ~523
Analyze disagreements and find common ground. Actions: - run: Trigger analysis — extracts cruxes, clusters, consensus (deliberation_id; optional: model) - get_result: Get analysis result (deliberation_id; optional: round). While the analysis is running, returns {status:"pending", analysis_status: <stage>} with the current pipeline stage (taxonomy / extracting / crux_detection / clustering) so a single poll loop on this tool replaces calling deliberation action:get for progress. - cancel: Cancel in-progress analysis (deliberation_id) - propose_compromise: Generate a compromise statement (deliberation_id; optional: model) - reframe: Restate a position emphasizing common ground (deliberation_id, position_id; optional: model) - challenge: Challenge an analysis result (deliberation_id, agent_id, reason) - dispute_crux: Dispute a crux classification (deliberation_id, agent_id, crux_claim, correction) - expert_panel: Run an adversarial expert panel review (document; optional: topic, source_type, depth, experts, group_id, model). Creates a deliberation, submits expert critiques, triggers analysis. Returns deliberation_id immediately — poll with deliberation action:get for status, then analyze action:get_result. depth: "quick" (~2 min, 3 experts, tight taxonomy) or "thorough" (~7 min, 5 experts, full taxonomy). source_type selects specialized experts: "code_review", "architecture", "experiment", "proposal". - follow_up: Submit follow-up expert positions responding to round 1 cruxes, then trigger round 2 analysis (deliberation_id; optional: model). Experts review the cruxes and consensus, flag misclassifications, and identify missed issues. Requires round 1 to be complete.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| action | string | yes | – |
| agent_id | string | – | – |
| correction | string | – | – |
| crux_claim | string | – | – |
| deliberation_id | string | – | – |
| depth | string | – | – |
| document | string | – | – |
| experts | string | – | – |
| group_id | string | – | – |
| model | string | – | – |
| option_votes | object | – | – |
| options | null|array | – | – |
| position_id | string | – | – |
| reason | string | – | – |
| result_json | string | – | – |
| round | null|integer | – | – |
| source_type | string | – | – |
| topic | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
coordinate ~196
Multi-agent coordination. Actions: - delegate: Delegate your vote to another agent (deliberation_id, from_agent, to_agent; optional: scope) - invite: Invite an agent to join (deliberation_id, invited_by, invited_agent, reason; optional: role) - generate_join_code: Generate a short-lived join code (deliberation_id; optional: role, ttl_minutes) - join: Join a deliberation using a code (code, agent_id)
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| action | string | yes | – |
| agent_id | string | – | – |
| code | string | – | – |
| deliberation_id | string | – | – |
| from_agent | string | – | – |
| invited_agent | string | – | – |
| invited_by | string | – | – |
| reason | string | – | – |
| role | string | – | – |
| scope | string | – | – |
| to_agent | string | – | – |
| ttl_minutes | integer | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
decide ~254
Commitments and reputation tracking. Actions: - commit: Commit to a deliberation outcome (deliberation_id, agent_id, statement; optional: conditional) - get_commitments: Get all commitments (deliberation_id) - fulfill: Mark a commitment as fulfilled (commitment_id; optional: verified_by) — caller must be a participant in the commitment's deliberation, and cannot be the agent that made it - break: Mark a commitment as broken (commitment_id, reason; optional: verified_by) — caller must be a participant in the commitment's deliberation; the committing agent may break its own - reputation: Get an agent's commitment track record (agent_id; optional: group_id)
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| accessor_id | string | – | – |
| action | string | yes | – |
| agent_id | string | – | – |
| commitment_id | string | – | – |
| conditional | string | – | – |
| deliberation_id | string | – | – |
| dependent_commitment_id | string | – | – |
| group_id | string | – | – |
| kind | string | – | – |
| note | string | – | – |
| reason | string | – | – |
| statement | string | – | – |
| verified_by | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
deliberation ~283
Manage deliberations. Actions: - create: Create a new deliberation (topic, description, template, group_id, deadline_minutes, rules, visibility, max_participants, type, principal_policy, signature_policy) - get: Get status/stats of a deliberation (deliberation_id) - list: List all deliberations (limit, offset) - list_by_group: List deliberations in a group (group_id, limit, offset) - list_by_agent: List deliberations an agent participated in (agent_id, limit, offset) - delete: Soft-delete a deliberation (deliberation_id) - set_template: Change governance template (deliberation_id, template) - export: Export complete multi-round history (deliberation_id)
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| action | string | yes | – |
| agent_id | string | – | – |
| deadline_minutes | integer | – | – |
| deliberation_id | string | – | – |
| description | string | – | – |
| group_id | string | – | – |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| max_participants | integer | – | – |
| offset | integer | – | – |
| principal_policy | string | – | – |
| rules | object | – | – |
| signature_policy | string | – | – |
| template | string | – | – |
| topic | string | – | – |
| type | string | – | – |
| visibility | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
participate ~448
Participate in a deliberation. Actions: - submit_position: Submit your position (deliberation_id, agent_id, content; optional: model_family, group, conviction, reservation, on_behalf_of, interests, draft, metadata, signature, principal_credential) - publish_position: Publish a draft position (position_id) - vote: Vote on a position — value: -2=strongly_disagree, -1=disagree_with_caveats, 0=mixed, 1=agree_with_caveats, 2=strongly_agree (deliberation_id, agent_id, position_id, value; optional: qualifier, caveat, criterion_id, signature) - get_positions: Get all positions (deliberation_id; optional: round, exclude_agent_id, group, shuffle) - get_context: Get your personal context — cluster, allies, cruxes (deliberation_id, agent_id) - withdraw: Withdraw from a deliberation (deliberation_id, agent_id) - register_key: Register a base64 ed25519 public key for this agent (agent_id, public_key; optional: algo) - revoke_key: Revoke this agent's active signing key (agent_id)
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| action | string | yes | – |
| agent_id | string | – | – |
| algo | string | – | – |
| caveat | string | – | – |
| content | string | – | – |
| conviction | number | – | – |
| criterion_id | string | – | – |
| deliberation_id | string | – | – |
| draft | boolean | – | – |
| exclude_agent_id | null|string | – | – |
| group | string | – | – |
| interests | string | – | – |
| metadata | object | – | – |
| model_family | string | – | – |
| on_behalf_of | string | – | – |
| position_id | string | – | – |
| principal_credential | null|object | – | – |
| public_key | string | – | – |
| qualifier | string | – | – |
| reservation | string | – | – |
| round | null|integer | – | – |
| shuffle | null|boolean | – | – |
| signature | string | – | – |
| value | integer | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the Gemot Deliberation Server MCP server?
Gemot Deliberation Server is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as dev.gemot/gemot. Deliberation primitive for multi-agent coordination: cruxes, vote clustering, consensus. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://gemot.dev/mcp).
Is the Gemot Deliberation Server MCP server safe to use?
Gemot Deliberation Server scores 72 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Gemot Deliberation Server MCP server expose?
Gemot Deliberation Server exposes 7 tools: account, admin, analyze, coordinate, decide, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 2,001 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Gemot Deliberation Server MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Gemot Deliberation Server without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Gemot Deliberation Server MCP server still maintained?
Gemot Deliberation Server is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 27 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.