Dexra
REMOTE · API.DEXRA.DEV
Solana DeFi checks for AI agents: launches, holders, wallets, pools, perps and swaps, with verdicts.
Available components
Last scanned (4 hours ago)
Scores higher than 46% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 18 Oct 2026.
Category Crypto and Web3
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security63
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS enforcement could not be verified: the plaintext port answered with HTTP 405, which proves neither a plaintext path nor enforcement. View diagnostics → Unverified
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability68
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1643 tokens (~136/item across 12 items; 12 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management3
- Stability observed for 1 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage92
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 75% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 12 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 13 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 18 Oct 26 +1
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Tool “clmm_range_stats” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “market_snapshot” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “new_launches” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “new_launches_batch” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “pool_health” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “swap_preflight” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “token_deep_check” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “token_holders_delta” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 117 → 136 ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 70% → 75% ▲ functional
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- “new_launches_batch” reworded the description of “mints” cosmetic
- 17 Oct 26 63
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 18 Oct 2026 · Probed https://api.dexra.dev/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=api.dexra.dev | CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 17 Oct 2026 | 15 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 5ad4da61987e1bffc066dc7e544933687e0 |
| SANs: api.dexra.dev | ||||||
| CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of api.dexra.dev. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| dev. | present | 60074 | 8 | Verified |
| dexra.dev. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://api.dexra.dev/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://api.dexra.dev/mcp | Inconclusive | 405 |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
clmm_range_stats Which range to hold in a concentrated pool ~134
For Raydium CLMM, Orca Whirlpool and Meteora DLMM: liquidity by price, share of time a range of the given width would have stayed in range over 7 and 30 days, fee yield inside the range, impermanent loss and how many rebalances it would have needed. Returns a verdict (ok, caution, avoid, or unknown when data is missing) with reasons. Price: 0.020 USDC per call, included in subscriptions.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| pool | string | yes | Concentrated liquidity pool |
| width_pct | number | – | Full range width in percent of the current price |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
describe_address Describe a Solana address ~76
Free. Call first with any Solana address to learn what it is: wallet, program, pool or token, its age, activity and basic stats. Points to the paid tool that answers the next question (wallet_check, pool_health, token_deep_check). Price: free.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| address | string | yes | Any Solana address |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
market_snapshot Perp venues and execution cost in one answer ~121
Funding, open interest, liquidations and order book depth for a ticker across Binance, Bybit, OKX, Hyperliquid and Drift, price and funding divergence, and the all-in cost of an order of the given size on each venue and on Jupiter with the cheapest venue. Returns a verdict (ok, caution, avoid, or unknown when data is missing) with reasons. Price: 0.010 USDC per call, included in subscriptions.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| size_usd | number | – | – |
| symbol | string | yes | Ticker such as SOL |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
new_launches Fresh Solana launches, already checked ~228
New tokens and pools on Solana (pump.fun, LetsBonk, Raydium LaunchLab, Meteora DBC, PumpSwap, Raydium AMM and CPMM) from the last N minutes with mint and freeze authority, liquidity and lock, creator history and links to past collapses, and the first-buyer funding graph: same-block buyers, wallets funded by the creator or by one shared address, known snipers. Each launch has a verdict (ok, caution, avoid, or unknown when data is missing) with reasons. Windows over 60 minutes cost more. Price: 0.005 USDC per call, included in subscriptions.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| include_collapsed | boolean | – | – |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| min_liquidity_usd | number | – | – |
| minutes | integer | – | Look-back window in minutes |
| platforms | string | – | Comma separated: pump_fun, letsbonk, raydium_launchlab, meteora_dbc, pump_swap, raydium_amm_v4, raydium_cpmm |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
new_launches_batch Launch checks for a list of mints ~117
The same checks as new_launches (authorities, liquidity and lock, creator history, first-buyer funding graph) for up to 50 Solana token mints you already know about, in one call (plans can allow more). Each launch has a verdict (ok, caution, avoid, or unknown when data is missing) with reasons. Price: 0.015 USDC per call, included in subscriptions.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| mints | array | yes | Up to 50 mints, or the account plan's batch limit |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
pool_health Real pool yield after impermanent loss ~127
For Raydium AMM, CPMM and CLMM, Orca Whirlpool, Meteora DLMM and PumpSwap pools: depth within 2%, slippage for $1k and $10k, 24h liquidity inflow or outflow, LP return versus holding over 7 and 30 days after impermanent loss, bot and sandwich share of volume. Returns a verdict (ok, caution, avoid, or unknown when data is missing) with reasons. Price: 0.030 USDC per call, included in subscriptions.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| pool | string | yes | Pool address |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
score_performance Measured accuracy of our flags ~60
Free. For every launch risk flag we publish: how often flagged tokens collapsed within 24h versus the base rate across all launches, sample size, test window and daily drift. Price: free.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| days | integer | – | Test window in days |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
service_stats Service reputation ~46
Free. Calls, unique payers, paid volume, uptime and latency of this service over 24h, 7d and 30d. Check before paying. Price: free.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
swap_preflight Is this swap safe to execute now ~153
Before a Solana swap: price impact on the best route, sandwich share on the pool from our history, Token-2022 transfer fees, hooks and permanent delegate, mint and freeze authority. Returns a verdict (ok, caution, avoid) with reasons, and the assessment behind it (ok, unverified, high_slippage_risk, high_sandwich_risk, blocked). Price: 0.005 USDC per call, included in subscriptions.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| amount | number | yes | Amount in quote units for buy, in token units for sell |
| mint | string | yes | Token to buy or sell |
| quote | string | – | Quote mint, SOL by default |
| side | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
token_deep_check Holder graph and history for a token ~135
Use before buying or holding a Solana token to see who really holds it: which top holders were funded from the same address, real concentration after merging linked wallets, holder and liquidity dynamics from our snapshot history, blacklist proximity within two transfers, and the mint's authorities and Token-2022 extensions (transfer fee, hook, permanent delegate). Returns a verdict (ok, caution, avoid, or unknown when data is missing) with reasons. Goes deeper than a single safety score such as RugCheck's. Price: 0.030 USDC per call, included in subscriptions.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| mint | string | yes | Token mint |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
token_holders_delta Who entered and left the top holders ~93
Use to see whether insiders are leaving a Solana token: top holder changes over 1h and 24h from our snapshots, new and exited holders, concentration shift and large holders selling. Returns a verdict (ok, caution, avoid, or unknown when data is missing) with reasons. Price: 0.030 USDC per call, included in subscriptions.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| mint | string | yes | Token mint |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
wallet_check Should I deal with this address ~75
One verdict with reasons for a Solana address: known exchange or not, age, activity, bot or human, PnL on fresh launches, exchange funding, OFAC and hack links up to two hops. Price: 0.030 USDC per call, included in subscriptions.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| address | string | yes | Wallet address |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Dexra MCP server?
Dexra is a hosted endpoint at https://api.dexra.dev/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · api.dexra.dev
claude mcp add --transport http dev-dexra-dexra 'https://api.dexra.dev/mcp'
What is the Dexra MCP server?
Dexra is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as dev.dexra/dexra. Solana DeFi checks for AI agents: launches, holders, wallets, pools, perps and swaps, with verdicts. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://api.dexra.dev/mcp).
Is the Dexra MCP server safe to use?
Dexra scores 64 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Dexra MCP server expose?
Dexra exposes 12 tools: describe_address, service_stats, score_performance, new_launches, new_launches_batch, and 7 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,365 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Dexra MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Dexra without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Dexra MCP server still maintained?
Dexra is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 18 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.