Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

ApproveKit

REMOTE · APPROVEKIT.DEV

Audit apps against App Store, Google Play and Google OAuth review rules; get the required docs.

Available components

+1 this week 81 Trust /100

Last scanned (7 hours ago)

Scores higher than 84% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Security

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability77
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 502 tokens (~125/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage93
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 78% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • All 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 22 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 20 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 18 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 15 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://approvekit.dev/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=approvekit.dev CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 30 Sept 2026 29 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 24e3ea99c1b567710e99d673d79fa98c
SANs: approvekit.dev, *.approvekit.dev
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of approvekit.dev. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
dev. present 60074 8 Verified
approvekit.dev. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://approvekit.dev/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://approvekit.dev/mcp Inconclusive 406
MCP tools · 4 exposed · ~502 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
audit_app ~162

Use before submitting a mobile or web app to the Apple App Store, Google Play or Google OAuth verification. Pass an inventory of what the app collects, which SDKs it uses and which Google scopes it requests (build it by reading the repo). Returns the problems reviewers are likely to reject, how to fix each one, and which paid package generates the missing documents. Free. The first call returns an app_token: save it in .approvekit.json at the project root and pass it on later calls so the app is updated instead of duplicated.

NameTypeReqDescription
app_tokenstring–The app_token returned by audit_app. It is stored in .approvekit.json at the project root. Omit on the first audit of an app.
inventoryobjectyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

create_checkout ~102

Creates a Stripe Checkout link for one app. Only call this after the user agreed to the purchase. Show the link to the user so they can pay; then call get_order with the returned order_id to receive the documents.

NameTypeReqDescription
app_tokenstringyesThe app_token returned by audit_app. It is stored in .approvekit.json at the project root.
productstringyeslaunch_pass (US$49) or oauth_pack (US$249).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_order ~99

Returns the payment status of an order. Once paid, returns every generated document as Markdown plus the public URLs of the hosted privacy policy and account deletion pages, ready to paste into App Store Connect, Play Console or the Google OAuth consent screen.

NameTypeReqDescription
app_tokenstringyesThe app_token returned by audit_app. It is stored in .approvekit.json at the project root.
order_idstringyesThe order_id returned by create_checkout.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

publish_document ~139

Saves the final version of a document after every [CONFIRM: ...] placeholder has been resolved with the user. For privacy-policy and account-deletion this makes the hosted page live at its public URL; for the other kinds it just stores the final text. Call it again whenever the text needs an update (for example after the app adds a new data type).

NameTypeReqDescription
app_tokenstringyesThe app_token returned by audit_app. It is stored in .approvekit.json at the project root.
kindstringyes–
markdownstringyesThe complete final document in Markdown (headings, lists, bold and links only).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the ApproveKit MCP server?

ApproveKit is a hosted endpoint at https://approvekit.dev/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · approvekit.dev

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http dev-approvekit-approvekit 'https://approvekit.dev/mcp'
Common questions

What is the ApproveKit MCP server?

ApproveKit is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as dev.approvekit/approvekit. Audit apps against App Store, Google Play and Google OAuth review rules; get the required docs. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://approvekit.dev/mcp).

Is the ApproveKit MCP server safe to use?

ApproveKit scores 81 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the ApproveKit MCP server expose?

ApproveKit exposes 4 tools: audit_app, create_checkout, get_order, publish_document. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 502 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the ApproveKit MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to ApproveKit without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the ApproveKit MCP server still maintained?

ApproveKit is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.