Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.github.DeJo90/nace-mcp

NPM · NACE-MCP · SCANNED SEP 21

Browse, search and fuzzy-match NACE Rev. 2.1 economic activity classification codes.

Available components

0 this week 85 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security98
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • 31 of 95 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 213 days ago).Pass
  • Security-disclosure policy not yet verified: we couldn't inspect the source repository.Unverified
Schema Quality & AI Usability84
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 264 tokens (~66/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management97
  • Stability observed for 29 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Install

How do I install the io.github.DeJo90/nace-mcp server?

io.github.DeJo90/nace-mcp runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y nace-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · nace-mcp

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add dejo90-nace-mcp -- npx -y nace-mcp
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "dejo90-nace-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "nace-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "dejo90-nace-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "nace-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
# add to Codex CLI
codex mcp add dejo90-nace-mcp -- npx -y nace-mcp
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "dejo90-nace-mcp": {
      "type": "local",
      "command": [
        "npx",
        "-y",
        "nace-mcp"
      ],
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add dejo90-nace-mcp --command npx --arg -y --arg nace-mcp
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  dejo90-nace-mcp:
    command: "npx"
    args: ["-y", "nace-mcp"]
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "dejo90-nace-mcp": {
      "Transport": "stdio",
      "Command": "npx",
      "Arguments": [
        "-y",
        "nace-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
# add to Vellum
assistant mcp add dejo90-nace-mcp -t stdio -c npx -a -y nace-mcp
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "dejo90-nace-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "nace-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 21 Sept 26 0
    • Security disclosure: fail → unverified functional
  • 20 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 18 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 17 Sept 26 −3
    • Stability: pass → 0.83 functional
  • 16 Sept 26 +1
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 14 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 12 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 10 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 21 Sept 2026 · Analysed npm/nace-mcp@1.0.1

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem npm

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 95 packages
Packages resolved 95
Stale 31
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 4 exposed · ~264 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
nace_browse ~61

Returns direct children of a NACE code (code + label only). Omit parent_code to get all 22 top-level sections. Max 50 results.

NameTypeReqDescription
parent_codestringParent NACE code. Omit to list top-level sections.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

nace_get ~69

Returns full details for a single NACE Rev. 2.1 code: code, label, level (section/division/group/class), and parent code.

NameTypeReqDescription
codestringyesNACE code — e.g. 'A', '01', '01.1', '01.11'

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

nace_search ~59

Case-insensitive substring search across all 1,047 NACE Rev. 2.1 activity labels. Returns up to 10 matches with code, label, and level.

NameTypeReqDescription
querystringyesSubstring to search for in activity labels

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

nace_suggest ~75

Fuzzy-match a free-text activity description to NACE Rev. 2.1 codes. Tokenizes the input, scores by matched terms, and returns the top 5 candidates with a reason. Ideal for AI agents classifying business activities.

NameTypeReqDescription
activity_descriptionstringyesFree-text description of the economic activity to classify

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the io.github.DeJo90/nace-mcp server?

io.github.DeJo90/nace-mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.DeJo90/nace-mcp. Browse, search and fuzzy-match NACE Rev. 2.1 economic activity classification codes. This page covers its npm package (nace-mcp).

Is the io.github.DeJo90/nace-mcp server safe to use?

io.github.DeJo90/nace-mcp scores 85 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 21 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the io.github.DeJo90/nace-mcp server expose?

io.github.DeJo90/nace-mcp exposes 4 tools: nace_get, nace_browse, nace_search, nace_suggest. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 264 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the io.github.DeJo90/nace-mcp server still maintained?

io.github.DeJo90/nace-mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 21 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the io.github.DeJo90/nace-mcp server under?

io.github.DeJo90/nace-mcp declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.