WirStartenKI
REMOTE · WWW.WIRSTARTENKI.DE
Book a free 15-minute call with Felix Schmidt, AI management consultant for founders and CxOs.
Available components
Last scanned (14 hours ago)
Scores higher than 87% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category CRM and Sales
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability54
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1286 tokens (~321/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage91
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 74% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Checks we ran (13)
- TLS certificate
- Authorization
- HTTPS
- HSTS header
- DNSSEC
- Transport
- Schema quality
- Stability
- Tool coverage
- Injection markers
- Destructive annotations
- Judged manipulation
- MCP protocol
Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)
- Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
- Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 3 Nov 26 −1
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Schema quality: pass → fail ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 38% → 74% ▲ functional
- Server version: 1.0.0 → 1.1.0 functional
- New tool “ki_impact_analyse” functional
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 27 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 25 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 23 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 21 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://www.wirstartenki.de/mcp/
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=www.wirstartenki.de | CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 14 Sept 2026 | 13 Dec 2026 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 5ffa03509e2fb302c5410314f71377ee2cf |
| SANs: www.wirstartenki.de | ||||||
| CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of www.wirstartenki.de. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | Trust anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| de. | DS published | 26755 | 8 | Verified |
| wirstartenki.de. | No DS | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000 |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://www.wirstartenki.de/mcp/ | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://www.wirstartenki.de/mcp/ | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://www.wirstartenki.de/mcp/ |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
about_wirstartenki About WirStartenKI ~32
Who Felix Schmidt and WirStartenKI are, what the consulting covers and how a first call works.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
book_call Book a call with Felix ~104
Books one 15-minute video call in an open slot. Only after the person confirmed the time and their e-mail. Google e-mails the invite with the Meet link to that address.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| company | string | – | – |
| string | yes | – | |
| language | string | – | – |
| name | string | yes | – |
| slot_start | string | yes | slot_start exactly as returned by get_open_slots |
| topic | string | yes | What the person wants to talk about |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_open_slots Open call slots ~76
Free 15-minute slots for a video call with Felix, live from his calendar. Times are returned in the given IANA time zone and as UTC ISO strings for book_call.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| days_ahead | integer | – | – |
| timezone | string | – | IANA time zone of the person, e.g. Europe/Berlin |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
ki_impact_analyse KI-Impact-Analyse ~934
Where AI pays off first in a company. 15 multiple-choice questions: role, size, industry, revenue, biggest cost block, where the time goes, AI use today, data, ownership, know-how, repetitive share, headcount, standardisation, mandate, timing. Returns maturity, impact and momentum scores (0 to 100) with readings, three ranked AI levers, a conservative effect range for the cost block and a short assessment. Deterministic and free; no sign-in, the e-mail is optional.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| company | string | – | – |
| cost_block | string | yes | Where is your biggest cost block? engineering = Engineering and development; sales_marketing = Sales and marketing; service = Service and after-sales; operations = Production, purchasing and supply c… |
| data | string | yes | Where does the data for that block live? silos = In e-mails and Excel; mixed = Partly in ERP, CRM or PLM; central = Mostly in one system; apis = Structured and accessible via interfaces |
| string | – | Optional. With an e-mail the result is saved and the reply carries a personal report link. | |
| first_name | string | – | – |
| governance | string | yes | Who owns the AI topic? none = Nobody yet; discussed = It is discussed, nobody owns it; policy = There are rules, but no owner; owner = One person or team with a mandate |
| headcount | string | yes | How many people work in that block? lt5 = Under 5; h5_20 = 5 to 20; h20_100 = 20 to 100; gt100 = More than 100 |
| industry | string | yes | Which industry are you in? automotive = Automotive; industrial = Industrial manufacturing; energy = Energy; hightech = Electronics and high-tech; appliances = Consumer appliances; other = Another ind… |
| language | string | – | Language of the result |
| priority | string | yes | Is there a mandate or budget for it? none = Not yet; listed = It is on the list; this_year = Planned for this year; budget = Budget is approved |
| repetitive_share | string | yes | How much of the work in that block is repetitive? lt10 = Under 10 percent; s10_30 = 10 to 30 percent; s30_50 = 30 to 50 percent; gt50 = More than half |
| revenue | string | yes | Roughly, what is your annual revenue? r5 = Under 5 million; r25 = 5 to 25 million; r100 = 25 to 100 million; r500 = 100 to 500 million; r500plus = More than 500 million; none = Rather not say |
| role | string | yes | What is your role? founder_ceo = Founder or CEO; cxo = CxO or managing director; head = Head of a division or department; manager = Team lead or project lead; other = Something else |
| size | string | yes | How many people work in your company? s50 = Under 50; s250 = 50 to 250; s1000 = 250 to 1,000; s1000plus = More than 1,000 |
| skills | string | yes | How much AI know-how is in the team? none = Hardly any; enthusiasts = A few enthusiasts; trained = Trained users; experts = People who build with it |
| standardisation | string | yes | How standardised is the work there? adhoc = Everyone does it their own way; partly = Partly, with templates; documented = Documented processes; measured = Documented and measured |
| time_sink | string | yes | Where does most of the time go in that block? documentation = Writing documents and reports; reporting = Collecting figures and reporting; search = Searching for information; customer_comms = Answeri… |
| timeline | string | yes | When do you want to start? none = Just exploring; m12 = Within twelve months; m6 = Within six months; now = Now |
| tools | string | yes | How is AI used in your company today? none = Not at all; individuals = A few people use ChatGPT and the like; pilots = First pilot projects; rollout = Live in one area; embedded = Part of several pro… |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the WirStartenKI MCP server?
WirStartenKI is a hosted endpoint at https://www.wirstartenki.de/mcp/, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · www.wirstartenki.de
claude mcp add --transport http de-wirstartenki-wirstartenki 'https://www.wirstartenki.de/mcp/'
What is the WirStartenKI MCP server?
WirStartenKI is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as de.wirstartenki/wirstartenki. Book a free 15-minute call with Felix Schmidt, AI management consultant for founders and CxOs. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.wirstartenki.de/mcp/).
Is the WirStartenKI MCP server safe to use?
WirStartenKI scores 83 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the WirStartenKI MCP server expose?
WirStartenKI exposes 4 tools: about_wirstartenki, ki_impact_analyse, get_open_slots, book_call. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,146 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the WirStartenKI MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to WirStartenKI without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the WirStartenKI MCP server still maintained?
WirStartenKI is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What did VerifyMCP test on the WirStartenKI MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on WirStartenKI, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.