Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Vergabeweiser

REMOTE · VERGABEWEISER.DE

German public tenders and contract awards: search, deadlines, winners, market figures. Open data.

Available components

74 Trust /100

Last scanned (9 hours ago)

Scores higher than 62% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Finance and Payments

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
  • The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
  • No authorisation is required to call this server. Nothing on it is marked destructive, but we can't show that an anonymous caller can only read: full credit needs the server to list at least one tool and every tool to be verifiably read-only. We use a best-effort check of tool names and descriptions to tell read-only tools from tools that change things, so some genuinely read-only tools may not get full credit. Names that start with a read verb (get, list, read, search and similar) and accurate readOnlyHint annotations help. Meet that to earn full credit, or require authorisation. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
  • HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
  • The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
  • DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability60
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1831 tokens (~228/item across 8 items; 8 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management20
  • Stability observed for 6 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 8 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 9 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (13)

  • TLS certificate
  • Authorization
  • HTTPS
  • HSTS header
  • DNSSEC
  • Transport
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)

  • Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
  • Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1
    • Tool “get_company_awards” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “get_tender” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
  • 31 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
    • “search_tenders” reworded the description of “place” cosmetic
    • “search_tenders” reworded the description of “radius_km” cosmetic
  • 30 Oct 26 71

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://vergabeweiser.de/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=vergabeweiser.de CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 25 Oct 2026 23 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 6c0606ae54f0e5b647665ed2848251f4c5d
SANs: vergabeweiser.de
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of vergabeweiser.de. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. Trust anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
de. DS published 26755 8 Verified
vergabeweiser.de. No DS Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=31536000

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://vergabeweiser.de/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://vergabeweiser.de/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://vergabeweiser.de/mcp
MCP tools · 8 exposed · ~1,445 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
expiring_contracts ~122

Awarded service and supply contracts whose term ends within the next months according to the notice (end date or duration, without renewals), with winner, renewals and offers. A new tender is likely but not certain. Needs at least gewerk, land or buyer.

NameTypeReqDescription
buyerstring–Buyer slug or vergabeweiser.de/vergabestelle URL
gewerkstring–Trade slug from list_categories
landstring–Bundesland slug
monthsinteger–Months from today, default 12

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

find_organisations ~122

Find contracting authorities (Vergabestellen) and companies by name or its beginning, e.g. "Stadt Köln", "Fraunhofer", "WISAG". Returns name, city, slug and page URL for get_buyer and get_company_awards, the most active first. Only organisations with a page in the index; sole traders are never listed.

NameTypeReqDescription
namestringyesName or its beginning, at least three characters
typestring–Only Vergabestellen (buyer) or only companies; both by default

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_buyer ~104

A contracting authority (Vergabestelle): contact data from one of its notices (no persons; may belong to a law firm or central purchasing body that runs procedures for it, for a procedure use the contact in its notice), platforms, open tenders, recent awards, offers per award, frequent winners, trades and contracts that end soon.

NameTypeReqDescription
slugstringyesSlug from vergabeweiser.de/vergabestelle/{slug} or that URL

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_company_awards ~127

Contracts won by a company (legal entities with a page on vergabeweiser.de/unternehmen only, never sole traders): totals, buyers, Länder, trades and the awards, 25 per page, with the company's published sum. firm_shared_max: an amount the notice gives alike for several winners of the procedure (usually a shared framework ceiling); not counted as the company's sum or share.

NameTypeReqDescription
pageinteger–Page of awards, 25 per page
slugstringyesSlug from vergabeweiser.de/unternehmen/{slug} or that URL

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_tender ~167

One tender: description, all deadlines (Bieterfragen, Teilnahmeantrag, Angebotsfrist), procedure, lots, result with winners, sums and number of offers, link to the documents on the buyer's platform and to the original notice. result.framework_max is the ceiling of a framework agreement for all call-offs, not an award sum: never report it as the contract value or a firm's share. Do not add up awards[].amount, result.sum is the sum: amount_is_shared_ceiling marks an amount several winners share, never that winner's own sum, amount_covers_several_lots a bid over several lots.

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyesTender id (8–12 characters at the end of the URL) or the full vergabeweiser.de URL

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_categories ~26

Slugs of all trades (Gewerke) and Bundesländer for the other tools.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

market_stats ~126

Market of one trade in Germany, a Bundesland or a Kreis: tenders in the last 12 months, open now, median offers per award, share with a single offer, typical award sums (quartiles) and frequent winners.

NameTypeReqDescription
gewerkstringyesTrade slug from list_categories, e.g. gebaeudereinigung
kreisstring–Kreis slug inside that Land, as in vergabeweiser.de/ausschreibungen/{gewerk}/{land}/{kreis}
landstring–Bundesland slug, e.g. bayern

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_tenders ~651

Search German public tenders like vergabeweiser.de/suche. Free text in German may contain a trade and a place ("Gebäudereinigung Rosenheim", "Dach 25 km um 90402"). Returns 20 results per page with deadline, buyer, place, estimated value and the page URL. result.framework_max is the ceiling of a framework agreement, never an award sum.

NameTypeReqDescription
buyer_groupstring–Only tenders of a buyer group: bund (federal bodies incl. Bundeswehr and Autobahn GmbH), bundeswehr, autobahn-gmbh, deutsche-bahn, fraunhofer, aok, deutsche-rentenversicherung, krankenhaeuser (hospit…
gewerkstring–Trade slug from list_categories, e.g. gebaeudereinigung
landstring–Bundesland slug from list_categories, e.g. bayern
pageinteger–Result page, 20 per page
placestring–Place: city, postcode or its first digits, Kreis or Bundesland (name or code), e.g. "Rosenheim", "90402", "904", "Bayern", "BY". Also as people write it: with a radius ("München 25 km", "50 km um Mün…
procedurestring–tw: with Teilnahmewettbewerb, einladung: by invitation only
querystring–Free text in German: trade, subject, buyer name, optionally a place, e.g. "Unterhaltsreinigung Schule München"
radius_kminteger–Radius around place in km, default 50. Goes before a radius written into place
sortstring–frist: next deadline first, neu: newest, wert: highest value, treffer: relevance
statusstring–offen: open (default), bald: deadline within 7 days, ergebnisse: awarded or ended, alle: all
with_valueboolean–Only tenders with an estimated value or award sum

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Vergabeweiser MCP server?

Vergabeweiser is a hosted endpoint at https://vergabeweiser.de/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · vergabeweiser.de

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http de-vergabeweiser-tenders 'https://vergabeweiser.de/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Vergabeweiser MCP server?

Vergabeweiser is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as de.vergabeweiser/tenders. German public tenders and contract awards: search, deadlines, winners, market figures. Open data. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://vergabeweiser.de/mcp).

Is the Vergabeweiser MCP server safe to use?

Vergabeweiser scores 74 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Vergabeweiser MCP server expose?

Vergabeweiser exposes 8 tools: search_tenders, get_tender, find_organisations, get_buyer, get_company_awards, and 3 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,445 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Vergabeweiser MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Vergabeweiser without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Vergabeweiser MCP server still maintained?

Vergabeweiser is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What did VerifyMCP test on the Vergabeweiser MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 13 checks on Vergabeweiser, covering TLS certificate, Authorization, HTTPS, HSTS header and 9 more. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.