rechtsklar24
REMOTE · RECHTSKLAR24.DE
German e-commerce law: obligation dates, statutory fine ceilings, unit-price calculator. Sourced.
Available components
Last scanned (12 minutes ago)
Scores higher than 73% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 24 Oct 2026.
Category E-commerce
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability64
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1193 tokens (~298/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management37
- Stability observed for 11 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 24 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 22 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 20 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 15 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 14 Oct 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 13 Oct 26 72
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 24 Oct 2026 · Probed https://rechtsklar24.de/mcp?src=mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=rechtsklar24.de | CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 30 Jul 2026 | 28 Oct 2026 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | 67d402821d884a313d3f54e02e7c4cb507e |
| SANs: *.rechtsklar24.de, rechtsklar24.de | ||||||
| CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319 |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of rechtsklar24.de. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| de. | present | 26755 | 8 | Verified |
| rechtsklar24.de. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000 |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | SAMEORIGIN |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://rechtsklar24.de/mcp?src=mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://rechtsklar24.de/mcp?src=mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://rechtsklar24.de/mcp?src=mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
calculate_grundpreis Grundpreis nach § 5 PAngV berechnen ~347
Use when someone wants the base price (Grundpreis) for a product: "Grundpreis berechnen", "Preis pro Kilo/Liter/Meter/Quadratmeter", "12,90 € für 750 g". Input: total price including VAT, quantity and unit (g, kg, ml, l, mm, cm, m, cm2, m2, m3, stk). Returns the Grundpreis per legal reference unit (1 kg, 1 l, 1 m, 1 m², 1 m³ under § 5 PAngV; 100 g or 100 ml only with loose_goods=true), rounded to two decimals exactly like the calculator on rechtsklar24.de. A per-piece price is computed but flagged as not a Grundpreis (§ 4 PAngV). Arithmetic on the user's numbers only; it does not judge whether a specific offer is lawful.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| loose_goods | boolean | – | true nur bei loser, unverpackter Ware nach Gewicht oder Volumen: dann 100 g bzw. 100 ml als Bezugsgröße (§ 5 Absatz 2 PAngV). Standard false. |
| price | number | yes | Gesamtpreis in Euro inklusive Umsatzsteuer, z. B. 12.9. |
| quantity | number | yes | Füllmenge oder Inhalt in der angegebenen Einheit, z. B. 750. |
| unit | string | yes | Einheit der Menge: g, kg (Gewicht); ml, l (Volumen); mm, cm, m (Länge); cm2, m2 (Fläche); m3 (Raummaß); stk = Stückzahl (kein Grundpreis). |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| bezugsgroesse | string | yes | – |
| disclaimer | string | yes | – |
| einheit | string | yes | – |
| fakten | array | yes | – |
| grundpreis | number | yes | Auf zwei Nachkommastellen gerundet. |
| grundpreis_text | string | yes | – |
| hinweis | string|null | – | – |
| info_url | string | yes | – |
| lose_ware | boolean | yes | – |
| menge | number | yes | – |
| preis | number | yes | – |
| rechnung | string | yes | – |
| register_url | string | yes | – |
| stand | string|null | – | – |
| status | string | yes | kein_grundpreis = Preis je Stück: § 4 PAngV kennt dafür keinen Grundpreis; der Wert wird trotzdem ausgerechnet. |
No examples provided.
get_fine_ceilings Gesetzlicher Bußgeld- oder Strafrahmen ~179
Use for "wie hoch ist das Bußgeld", "Strafe", "was droht", "Höchstbetrag", "Vertragsstrafe Abmahnung" in German e-commerce law: BFSG, Preisangabenverordnung, Cookies/TDDDG, Verpackungsgesetz, Elektrogesetz, DSGVO, Produktsicherheit (ProdSG/GPSR), Vertragsstrafe bei der ersten Abmahnung (§ 13a UWG). Returns the statutory maximum from the source register with paragraph, URL and check date. It is always the legal ceiling, never an estimate for a specific case or shop.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| thema | string | yes | bfsg, pangv, cookies_tdddg, verpackg, elektrog, dsgvo, prodsg_gpsr oder abmahnung_vertragsstrafe. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| disclaimer | string | yes | – |
| fakten | array | yes | – |
| hinweis | string | yes | – |
| hoechstrahmen | string|null | – | – |
| info_url | string | yes | – |
| register_url | string | yes | – |
| stand | string|null | – | – |
| thema | string | yes | – |
| titel | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
get_obligation_dates Stichtag einer Pflicht im Onlineshop-Recht ~273
Use for "seit wann gilt", "ab wann", "wann kommt", "Frist", "Stichtag", "Übergangsfrist" around German/EU e-commerce obligations: Widerrufsbutton (§ 356a BGB), GPSR, BFSG (Barrierefreiheit), Greenwashing-Verbot/EmpCo, neue Produkthaftungsrichtlinie, Preisangabenverordnung 2022, Erlöschen des Widerrufsrechts. Returns the date from rechtsklar24's source register with the statute, the source URL and the date it was last checked, and says "gilt seit" or "gilt ab" computed from today. General information only: it does not say whether a particular shop is affected or compliant.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| thema | string | yes | widerrufsbutton = Pflicht zur elektronischen Widerrufsfunktion; gpsr = Produktsicherheitsverordnung; bfsg = Barrierefreiheit; greenwashing_empco = Greenwashing-Verbot; produkthaftung = Umsetzungsfris… |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| disclaimer | string | yes | – |
| fakten | array | yes | – |
| heute | string | yes | – |
| info_url | string | yes | – |
| register_url | string | yes | – |
| stand | string|null | – | – |
| status | string | yes | gilt_seit = Stichtag liegt vor heute; gilt_ab = Stichtag liegt in der Zukunft; frist = Zeitraum statt Stichtag. |
| stichtag | string|null | – | – |
| stichtag_text | string | yes | – |
| thema | string | yes | – |
| titel | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
get_study_facts Studienzahlen zum Onlineshop-Recht ~181
Use for figures about how common legal defects in online shops are: "wie viele Shops haben Fehler", "Studie Rechtsfehler Onlineshops", "wie viele Händler werden abgemahnt", "Abmahnquote", "Widerrufsbelehrung fehlerhaft Prozent". Returns the numbers from rechtsklar24's RechtsRadar-Report 2026 (n = 934 certified shops) and the Händlerbund surveys, each with n, method, publisher and primary source. Aggregate figures only; no shop names.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| thema | string | yes | rechtsradar_2026 = Gesamtergebnis des Reports; widerrufsbelehrung = Anteil mit Lücken in der Widerrufsbelehrung; abmahnquoten_haendlerbund = Abmahnquoten 2024 und 2025. |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| disclaimer | string | yes | – |
| fakten | array | yes | – |
| info_url | string | yes | – |
| methode | string | yes | – |
| register_url | string | yes | – |
| stand | string|null | – | – |
| thema | string | yes | – |
| titel | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
How do I install the rechtsklar24 MCP server?
rechtsklar24 is a hosted endpoint at https://rechtsklar24.de/mcp?src=mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · rechtsklar24.de
claude mcp add --transport http de-rechtsklar24-rechtsklar24 'https://rechtsklar24.de/mcp?src=mcp'
What is the rechtsklar24 MCP server?
rechtsklar24 is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as de.rechtsklar24/rechtsklar24. German e-commerce law: obligation dates, statutory fine ceilings, unit-price calculator. Sourced. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://rechtsklar24.de/mcp?src=mcp).
Is the rechtsklar24 MCP server safe to use?
rechtsklar24 scores 77 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the rechtsklar24 MCP server expose?
rechtsklar24 exposes 4 tools: get_obligation_dates, get_fine_ceilings, calculate_grundpreis, get_study_facts. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 980 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the rechtsklar24 MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to rechtsklar24 without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the rechtsklar24 MCP server still maintained?
rechtsklar24 is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 24 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.