Laborregister Deutschland
REMOTE · LABORREGISTER.DE
Orderable lab tests in Germany by analysis parameter, sample type and provider, with source links.
Available components
Last scanned (6 hours ago)
Scores higher than 59% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 18 Oct 2026.
Category Health and Science
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security74
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability56
- AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 238 tokens (~238/item across 1 items; 1 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management13
- Stability observed for 4 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage93
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 80% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 1 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 2 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 17 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 15 Oct 26 +1
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 14 Oct 26 67
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 18 Oct 2026 · Probed https://laborregister.de/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=laborregister.de | CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 25 Sept 2026 | 24 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 586497db2f39a2a78e10c725e76a3188eff |
| SANs: laborregister.de, www.laborregister.de | ||||||
| CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115 |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of laborregister.de. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| de. | present | 26755 | 8 | Verified |
| laborregister.de. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| content-security-policy | default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' https://www.googletagmanager.com; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data: https://www.google-analytics.com https://*.google-analytics.com; font-src 'self'; connect-src 'self' https://www.google-analytics.com https://*.google-analytics.com https://*.analytics.google.com; frame-ancestors 'none'; base-uri 'none'; form-action 'self'; object-src 'none' |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | no-referrer |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://laborregister.de/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://laborregister.de/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://laborregister.de/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
search_lab_tests Laboranalysen im Laborregister suchen ~148
Search the German Laborregister for directly orderable laboratory analyses by parameter and optional sample/provider filters. Returns up to 10 source-linked matches, not a complete market survey or medical advice. No purchases or modifications. German search terms work best. Do not send personal or health data. Respect source dates and usage terms at https://laborregister.de/nutzung.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| anbieter | string | – | Exact provider ID. |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| parameter | string | – | Exact parameter ID returned by the register. |
| probe | string | – | Sample material filter, e.g. Blut. |
| q | string | – | Search term, e.g. Zink. Required unless parameter is supplied. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Laborregister Deutschland MCP server?
Laborregister Deutschland is a hosted endpoint at https://laborregister.de/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · laborregister.de
claude mcp add --transport http de-laborregister-laborregister 'https://laborregister.de/mcp'
What is the Laborregister Deutschland MCP server?
Laborregister Deutschland is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as de.laborregister/laborregister. Orderable lab tests in Germany by analysis parameter, sample type and provider, with source links. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://laborregister.de/mcp).
Is the Laborregister Deutschland MCP server safe to use?
Laborregister Deutschland scores 69 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Laborregister Deutschland MCP server expose?
Laborregister Deutschland exposes 1 tool: search_lab_tests. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 148 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Laborregister Deutschland MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Laborregister Deutschland without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Laborregister Deutschland MCP server still maintained?
Laborregister Deutschland is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 18 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.