Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Cocktailline

REMOTE · COCKTAILLINE.DE

Cocktail recipes and an exact ingredient finder: what can I mix with what I have at home?

Available components

+3 this week 75 Trust /100

Last scanned (15 hours ago)

Scores higher than 68% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 23 Oct 2026.

Category Entertainment and Games

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability66
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 490 tokens (~81/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management33
  • Stability observed for 10 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage80
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 41% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 20 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 18 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 16 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 14 Oct 26 +1
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 13 Oct 26 70

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 23 Oct 2026 · Probed https://cocktailline.de/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=cocktailline.de CN=Sectigo Public Server Authentication CA DV R36,O=Sectigo Limited,C=GB 12 Oct 2026 10 Apr 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 12bb932270c14d83a2cafa5d2a17329d
SANs: cocktailline.de, www.cocktailline.de
CN=Sectigo Public Server Authentication CA DV R36,O=Sectigo Limited,C=GB (CA) CN=Sectigo Public Server Authentication Root R46,O=Sectigo Limited,C=GB 22 Mar 2021 21 Mar 2036 RSA 3072 SHA384-RSA 397a66cc2756362e0daa87ca6eabe3b1
CN=Sectigo Public Server Authentication Root R46,O=Sectigo Limited,C=GB (CA) CN=USERTrust RSA Certification Authority,O=The USERTRUST Network,L=Jersey City,ST=New Jersey,C=US 22 Mar 2021 18 Jan 2038 RSA 4096 SHA384-RSA d27fbbc1de359e5216ad6149586099c4
CN=USERTrust RSA Certification Authority,O=The USERTRUST Network,L=Jersey City,ST=New Jersey,C=US (CA) CN=AAA Certificate Services,O=Comodo CA Limited,L=Salford,ST=Greater Manchester,C=GB 12 Mar 2019 31 Dec 2028 RSA 4096 SHA384-RSA 3972443af922b751d7d36c10dd313595

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of cocktailline.de. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
de. present 26755 8 Verified
cocktailline.de. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload
content-security-policy default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'nonce-ztMpRqzxCZtfCgi3m2qSxFjgCFqeZqBrc4s5W3hE'; style-src 'self' 'nonce-ztMpRqzxCZtfCgi3m2qSxFjgCFqeZqBrc4s5W3hE'; img-src 'self' data: blob: https://m.media-amazon.com; font-src 'self'; media-src 'self' blob:; connect-src 'self'; worker-src 'self' blob:; object-src 'none'; base-uri 'none'; form-action 'self'; frame-ancestors 'none'; manifest-src 'self'; upgrade-insecure-requests
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options DENY
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy accelerometer=(), camera=(), geolocation=(), gyroscope=(), magnetometer=(), microphone=(), payment=(), usb=(), interest-cohort=(), browsing-topics=()

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://cocktailline.de/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://cocktailline.de/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://cocktailline.de/mcp
MCP tools · 6 exposed · ~429 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
fetch ~29

Fetch a Cocktailline recipe by id (as returned by search).

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

find_cocktails ~144

Finds cocktails that can be made with the ingredients the user has at home (exact matching against a curated recipe database: staples like ice and sugar count as available, garnishes are ignored). Optionally also returns drinks missing only 1–2 ingredients. Ingredient names may be given in English, German, French or Spanish.

NameTypeReqDescription
alcohol_freeboolean–Only non-alcoholic drinks
ingredientsarrayyesIngredients the user has, e.g. ["gin", "tonic water", "lime"]
languagestring––
limitinteger––
max_missinginteger–Also include drinks missing up to this many ingredients

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_recipe ~68

Returns a full cocktail recipe (ingredients with amounts, steps, glass, history) as Markdown, plus the link to the recipe page with photo, party calculator and ratings.

NameTypeReqDescription
cocktailstringyesCocktail name or slug, e.g. "Mojito"
languagestring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

missing_ingredients ~56

Tells which ingredients are still missing to make a given cocktail with what the user has.

NameTypeReqDescription
cocktailstringyesCocktail name or slug
ingredientsarrayyesIngredients the user has
languagestring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search ~35

Search Cocktailline recipes. Returns ids, titles and URLs; use fetch for the full recipe.

NameTypeReqDescription
querystringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_cocktails ~97

Searches cocktails by name, ingredient or taste (fruity, sour, sweet, bitter, fresh, creamy, spicy, smoky, sparkling), optionally only non-alcoholic.

NameTypeReqDescription
alcohol_freeboolean––
languagestring––
limitinteger––
querystring–Free text, e.g. "gin", "summer", "Margarita"
tastestring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Cocktailline MCP server?

Cocktailline is a hosted endpoint at https://cocktailline.de/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · cocktailline.de

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http de-cocktailline-cocktailline 'https://cocktailline.de/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Cocktailline MCP server?

Cocktailline is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as de.cocktailline/cocktailline. Cocktail recipes and an exact ingredient finder: what can I mix with what I have at home? This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://cocktailline.de/mcp).

Is the Cocktailline MCP server safe to use?

Cocktailline scores 75 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Cocktailline MCP server expose?

Cocktailline exposes 6 tools: find_cocktails, get_recipe, missing_ingredients, search_cocktails, search, fetch. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 429 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Cocktailline MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Cocktailline without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Cocktailline MCP server still maintained?

Cocktailline is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 23 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.