D'AUBE // BRIDGE²
MCPB · DAUBE-AGENT-BRIDGE-0.1.3.MCPB
Universal AI skill compiler and MCP bridge. Write once, run across agents.
Available components
Last scanned (7 hours ago)
Scores higher than 81% of MCPB servers
Category Developer Tools
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security12
- No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.Unverified
- Known CVEs were checked across the 16 of 16 dependencies we could resolve, so this covers what we could see, not the whole tree.Partial
- Install-script risk not yet assessed.Unverified
- 1 of 16 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency48
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 53 days ago).Pass
- Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability64
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 105 tokens (~35/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management70
- Stability observed for 21 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage71
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 3 Nov 26 −5
- Stability: pass → 0.63 functional
- 28 Oct 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 27 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 24 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 22 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 20 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed mcpb/https://github.com/daubesonntag-dotcom/daube-agent-bridge/releases/download/v0.1.3/daube-agent-bridge-0.1.3.mcpb
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | mcpb |
| Reason | No attestation published |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Dependencies 16 packages
| Packages resolved | 16 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 1 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
bridge_targets Bridge Targets ~17
Return supported compilation targets and the bridge version.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
compile_skill Compile Skill ~33
Compile one skill spec into artifacts for supported AI surfaces.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| endpoint | string | – | – |
| spec | object | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
validate_skill Validate Skill ~24
Validate a portable D'AUBE skill specification.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| spec | object | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
How do I install the D'AUBE // BRIDGE² MCP server?
D'AUBE // BRIDGE² ships as an MCPB bundle, a single file you download and open in an MCP host that supports MCPB bundles, such as Claude Desktop. The host reads the launch command from the bundle's own manifest, so there is no command to copy. The MCP registry declares no SHA-256 for this bundle, so there is no published digest to check the download against.
mcpb · daube-agent-bridge-0.1.3.mcpb
Download bundleThe MCP registry declares no SHA-256 for this bundle, so there is no published digest to check it against. Open it with an MCPB-capable host such as Claude Desktop.
What is the D'AUBE // BRIDGE² MCP server?
D'AUBE // BRIDGE² is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.daubesonntag-dotcom/daube-agent-bridge. Universal AI skill compiler and MCP bridge. Write once, run across agents. This page covers its MCPB bundle (https://github.com/daubesonntag-dotcom/daube-agent-bridge/releases/download/v0.1.3/daube-agent-bridge-0.1.3.mcpb).
Is the D'AUBE // BRIDGE² MCP server safe to use?
D'AUBE // BRIDGE² scores 50 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the D'AUBE // BRIDGE² MCP server expose?
D'AUBE // BRIDGE² exposes 3 tools: bridge_targets, validate_skill, compile_skill. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 74 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
What licence is the D'AUBE // BRIDGE² MCP server under?
D'AUBE // BRIDGE² declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.