Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Allergen Detector

REMOTE · ALLERGEN-DETECTOR-MCP.ONRENDER.COM

Checks food and cosmetic ingredients against each household member's allergies, incl. hidden names.

+3 this week 76 Trust /100

Last scanned (2 hours ago)

Scores higher than 66% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Health and Science

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security74
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability74
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 479 tokens (~159/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management33
  • Stability observed for 10 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 0
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Schema quality: pass → fail ▼ functional
    • “check_product_allergens” added an optional parameter “language” cosmetic
    • “lookup_ingredient” added an optional parameter “language” cosmetic
  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 0
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Tool “check_product_allergens” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Schema quality: 99 → 131 ▼ functional
  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 0
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Tool “check_product_allergens” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Schema quality: 117 → 99 ▲ functional
  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://allergen-detector-mcp.onrender.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=onrender.com CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 21 Sept 2026 20 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 6eb1e3fe7d0631ea1337bfa4a321c137
SANs: onrender.com, *.onrender.com
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of allergen-detector-mcp.onrender.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
onrender.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://allergen-detector-mcp.onrender.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://allergen-detector-mcp.onrender.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://allergen-detector-mcp.onrender.com/mcp
MCP tools · 3 exposed · ~350 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
check_product_allergens ~206

Check a product's ingredient list against the allergies of one or more people in a household. Catches allergens listed under other names (e.g. "arachis oil" for peanut, "casein" for milk, Latin plant names in cosmetics) and does not let "free from" claims hide a real ingredient. Covers food and cosmetics. Use when the user asks if a product or ingredient list is safe for someone with allergies. A result with no listed allergens is not a promise of safety: relay the limits, and never call the product "safe".

NameTypeReqDescription
householdarrayyesOne entry per person, each with their allergens.
ingredientsstringyesThe product's ingredient list, or the product page text that contains it.
languagestring–Language of the text, if known, e.g. "fr". Optional; helps short words in other languages be read correctly.
product_namestring–Product name, for the answer only.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_supported_allergens ~32

List the allergens this service can check (food and cosmetic), with the other names users may type for them.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

lookup_ingredient ~112

Tell which allergens, if any, an ingredient name belongs to, e.g. "sodium caseinate" -> milk, "Prunus amygdalus dulcis oil" -> tree nuts, "DMDM hydantoin" -> formaldehyde releasers.

NameTypeReqDescription
ingredientstringyesOne ingredient name as printed on a label.
languagestring–Language of the text, if known, e.g. "fr". Optional; helps short words in other languages be read correctly.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Allergen Detector MCP server?

Allergen Detector is a hosted endpoint at https://allergen-detector-mcp.onrender.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · allergen-detector-mcp.onrender.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http daniellemeng1022-allergen-detector 'https://allergen-detector-mcp.onrender.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Allergen Detector MCP server?

Allergen Detector is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.daniellemeng1022/allergen-detector. Checks food and cosmetic ingredients against each household member's allergies, incl. hidden names. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://allergen-detector-mcp.onrender.com/mcp).

Is the Allergen Detector MCP server safe to use?

Allergen Detector scores 76 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Allergen Detector MCP server expose?

Allergen Detector exposes 3 tools: check_product_allergens, lookup_ingredient, list_supported_allergens. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 350 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Allergen Detector MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Allergen Detector without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Allergen Detector MCP server still maintained?

Allergen Detector is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.