io.github.danafitkowski/cpp-cpm-engine
REMOTE · MCP.CRITICALPATHPARTNERS.CA · SCANNED SEP 20
Forensic scheduling MCP for Primavera P6 (XER): AACE windows, DCMA-14, Monte Carlo, TIA.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security63
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 13 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability57
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 10820 tokens (~832/item across 13 items; 13 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage67
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 13 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 14 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
How do I install the io.github.danafitkowski/cpp-cpm-engine MCP server?
io.github.danafitkowski/cpp-cpm-engine is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.criticalpathpartners.ca/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · mcp.criticalpathpartners.ca
claude mcp add --transport http danafitkowski-cpp-cpm-engine 'https://mcp.criticalpathpartners.ca/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"danafitkowski-cpp-cpm-engine": {
"url": "https://mcp.criticalpathpartners.ca/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"danafitkowski-cpp-cpm-engine": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.criticalpathpartners.ca/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.danafitkowski-cpp-cpm-engine] url = "https://mcp.criticalpathpartners.ca/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"danafitkowski-cpp-cpm-engine": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://mcp.criticalpathpartners.ca/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add danafitkowski-cpp-cpm-engine --url 'https://mcp.criticalpathpartners.ca/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
danafitkowski-cpp-cpm-engine:
url: "https://mcp.criticalpathpartners.ca/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"danafitkowski-cpp-cpm-engine": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://mcp.criticalpathpartners.ca/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add danafitkowski-cpp-cpm-engine -t streamable-http -u 'https://mcp.criticalpathpartners.ca/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"danafitkowski-cpp-cpm-engine": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.criticalpathpartners.ca/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 20 Sept 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 18 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 16 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 13 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 11 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 9 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 8 Sept 26 0
- Tool “dcma14_health_check” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- 7 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Probed https://mcp.criticalpathpartners.ca/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=mcp.criticalpathpartners.ca | CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 29 Aug 2026 | 27 Nov 2026 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 5ac70a8fe2e011062d41090b350236dad67 |
| SANs: mcp.criticalpathpartners.ca | ||||||
| CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of mcp.criticalpathpartners.ca. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| ca. | present | 26384 | 13 | Verified |
| criticalpathpartners.ca. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://mcp.criticalpathpartners.ca/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://mcp.criticalpathpartners.ca/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://mcp.criticalpathpartners.ca/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
claim_workbench_evidence_ledger ~808
Forensic claim workbench — analyzes a folder of mixed evidence (XER chain + MSG/PDF/DOCX/XLSX correspondence) and produces a unified workbench dashboard. Built from the real-world workflow where forensic delay analysis starts from a folder containing schedule updates, owner correspondence, RFIs, change orders, and meeting minutes — all mixed together. The workbench produces: - Evidence ledger (chronological): all artifacts dated and summarized - Schedule chain-diff: 14-category manipulation log (TASKPRED add/remove, constraint flips, retroactive baseline edits, completion reversals) - Rolling baseline: per-activity baseline-at-introduction across the entire XER chain - Trust score: statistical impossibilities flagged (zero-duration-variance schedules, no-new-activities, every-activity-hits-baseline, etc.) - Slip-to-evidence cross-reference: each forensic slip auto-paired with documents in its window mentioning affected activity codes - Unified HTML dashboard with all of the above Use this tool when starting forensic delay analysis from raw evidence. For single-XER-pair forensic with hand-prepared events, use ``forensic_windows_analysis`` instead. Two input modes (supply exactly one): * ``folder_path`` — a server-side evidence folder that already resolves UNDER the server temp directory (the path guard). Hosted callers cannot reach a desktop path this way. * ``evidence_files`` — a CONTENT MANIFEST: a list of ``{"name": str, "content_b64": str}`` entries carrying base64-encoded file BYTES (handles binary PDF/XLSX/MSG as well as tex…
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| contract_form | string | – | – |
| evidence_files | – | – | – |
| folder_path | string | – | – |
| original_baseline_xer_filename | string | – | – |
| output_dir | string | – | – |
| project_name | string | – | – |
| run_forensic | boolean | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
collapsed_as_built ~722
Collapsed As-Built / But-For analysis on a post-impact XER. Implements AACE RP 29R-03 §3.8 Modeled / Subtractive / Single Base method (paired with MIP 3.3 Windows for the dual-method gap report per SCL §11.5). Validates a forensic windows analysis (MIP 3.3) by independently computing the same project drift via subtractive removal of delays from the as-built schedule. For each delay event, the as-built duration of every ``affected_activity`` is shortened by ``impact_days`` (or removed entirely if ``removal_method="remove"``), then CPM re-runs and the resulting "but-for" finish date is compared to the as-built finish. Cumulative pass removes ALL events at once for a project-level but-for finish. Use this tool when opposing counsel demands a but-for analysis or you need a dual-method validation pairing §3.3 (windows) with §3.8 (collapsed-as-built). For prospective fragnet insertion (MIP 3.7), use ``time_impact_analysis_fragnet`` instead. Args: as_built_xer_path: server-side post-impact XER (after delays incurred). as_built_xer_content: full text of post-impact XER (alternative for hosted/remote use). Supply EXACTLY ONE of path/content. delay_events: list of event dicts. Each must have ``event_id``, ``affected_activities`` (list of task_codes), and ``impact_days`` (number). Optional: ``removal_method`` ('shorten'|'remove'), ``responsible_party``, ``name``, ``description``. output_dir: optional output dir for HTML/CSV (tempdir if ""). project_name: optional override. removal_method: global default 'shorten' or 'remove'. contractor_filter…
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| as_built_xer_content | string | – | – |
| as_built_xer_path | string | – | – |
| contractor_filter | boolean | – | – |
| delay_events | array | – | – |
| output_dir | string | – | – |
| project_name | string | – | – |
| removal_method | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
concurrent_delay_matrix ~998
Build the per-window x per-party concurrent-delay attribution matrix from a chronological list of XER snapshots. Implements the per-window concurrency view per AACE RP 29R-03 §3.3.I (apportionment) and §4.2 (concurrency). Where ``forensic_windows_analysis`` answers "how many days does each party own across the whole project?", this tool answers "how did each window distribute its shift across the parties?" — useful when defending or attacking concurrency findings on a window-by-window basis. CPP conservation check, per the AACE 29R-03 §3.3.E.13 requirement that the summed per-period net impacts equal the difference between the first schedule update and the last schedule update used in the evaluation: the sum of per-party column totals equals the sum of per-window completion shifts within ±1 day of rounding. The column-total definition is this tool's own bookkeeping, not an AACE rule. The ``conservation_check`` field on the response reflects this; ``conservation_diff_days`` carries the exact gap. IMPORTANT — conservation is NOT attribution. ``conservation_check`` can be True (the columns sum to the grand total) even when 100% of the shift lands in the Unattributed column, i.e. no party owns any of the drift. Read ``unattributed_share_pct`` and ``high_unattributed_share_warning`` to know whether a meaningful apportionment actually occurred. A fully-unattributed matrix conserves perfectly but attributes nothing — never present its green conservation check as a validated apportionment. Use this tool when you only need the matrix view; use ``forensic_windows_analysis`` for the full claim. Args: schedules: chronologicall…
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| schedules | array | – | – |
| xer_contents | array | – | – |
| xer_paths | array | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
critical_path_validator ~652
Critical-path validation, logic health, and DCMA-14 assessment of a Primavera P6 schedule. Runs the CPP critical-path validator: checks for false criticality, constraint-driven CP segments, open ends, broken logic, and surfaces a DCMA-14 block with the 14 metrics (logic, leads, lags, FS%, hard constraints, high float, high duration, invalid dates, resources, missed tasks, critical tasks, CPLI, BEI, etc.) at the chosen profile threshold (commercial / nuclear / mining). When ``baseline_xer_path`` is supplied, BEI (Baseline Execution Index) is computed. Use this tool to grade a schedule's logic health and find what should be fixed before forensic analysis. For the full HTML health-dashboard PDF render, use ``dcma14_health_check``. Args: xer_path: server-side path to the schedule XER. xer_content: full text of the schedule XER (alternative for hosted/remote use). Supply EXACTLY ONE of path/content. project_index: which project to analyze in a multi-project XER (0 = first/primary; default). profile: DCMA threshold profile - 'commercial' (default), 'nuclear', 'mining'. baseline_xer_path: optional server-side baseline XER for DCMA BEI. baseline_xer_content: optional baseline XER text content (alternative). Returns: Full validator result dict including: - 'project_name', 'data_date', 'analysis_timestamp' - 'total_activities', 'complete', activity counts - 'critical_path_findings': list of issues - 'logic_findings', 'constraint_findings' - 'overall_rating' / 'overall_score' / 'overall_confidence': LOGIC-HEALTH verdict only (open…
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| baseline_xer_content | string | – | – |
| baseline_xer_path | string | – | – |
| profile | string | – | – |
| project_index | integer | – | – |
| xer_content | string | – | – |
| xer_path | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
dcma14_health_check ~2,163
Full Schedule Health Dashboard HTML report — DCMA-14 + CPLI + BEI + variance/slip register against the baseline. Wraps the CPP Schedule Health Review skill, which produces a self-contained ~1.3 MB HTML dashboard. The dashboard renders DCMA metrics, charts, baseline-vs-current variance, slip register, GAO/AACE compliance bands, and a reproducibility manifest. Baseline XER is OPTIONAL as of Round 7 (Fix MCP-8). When omitted, the tool runs in "degraded mode": the current XER is used as its own baseline for a synthetic 0-variance run. The result carries ``degraded_mode: true`` and ``degraded_mode_reason`` explaining that BEI / variance / slip register KPIs are NOT meaningful in this mode. Supply baseline_xer_path or baseline_xer_content to get the real two-XER variance dashboard. REQUIRES Node + Playwright on the server (the dashboard renders via headless Chromium). The tool returns a clear error if either prerequisite is missing. Use this tool when you need the formal HTML deliverable. Do NOT treat ``critical_path_validator`` as a JSON view of this tool. It runs a SECOND, independent DCMA-14 implementation (``critical-path-validator/scripts/dcma14.py``) with its own criterion numbering, its own activity-eligibility rules and its own CPLI definition. Measured across the real-export corpus on 2026-08-25, the two engines return different verdicts on individual criteria for the same XER, and on some criteria they differ by construction on every file. Two separate DCMA-14 implementations, neither derived from the other. Cite one engine per matter and name which. If what you wanted was the JSON shape of THESE numbers, it is alr…
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| baseline_xer_content | string | – | – |
| baseline_xer_path | string | – | – |
| current_xer_content | string | – | – |
| current_xer_path | string | – | – |
| debug | boolean | – | – |
| output_path | string | – | – |
| return_html_inline | boolean | – | – |
| timeout_seconds | integer | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
forensic_windows_analysis ~639
Run forensic windows analysis (AACE RP 29R-03 §3.3, MIP 3.3 Observational / Dynamic / Contemporaneous As-Is) across multiple Primavera P6 XER snapshots and return the full analysis dict. This is the headline forensic tool — it computes per-window completion shifts, per-window slip registers (per-activity slip with critical/non-critical flag), per-window duration growth on critical-path activities, per-window per-party attribution (Owner / Contractor / Concurrent / Force Majeure / Unattributed), and cumulative project drift from baseline. The attribution math satisfies the CPP conservation check, per the AACE 29R-03 §3.3.E.13 requirement that the summed per-period net impacts equal the difference between the first schedule update and the last schedule update used in the evaluation (per-party day buckets sum to project drift within ±1 day, no cascade-double- counting). Use this tool for the full multi-window forensic claim. If you already have a windows result and only want the per-window × per-party grid view, call ``concurrent_delay_matrix`` instead. Args: schedules: list of dicts in chronological order. Minimum 2 entries (baseline + at least one update). Each dict must contain ``label`` (str) and EXACTLY ONE of: - ``xer_path`` — server-side filesystem path, OR - ``xer_content`` — full XER text content. Use ``xer_content`` when calling a hosted MCP server from a remote client whose XER lives locally. project_name: optional override; auto-picked from XER if "". baseline_idx: which entry in ``schedules`` is the contract baseline (default 0 = first o…
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| baseline_idx | integer | – | – |
| entitlement_milestone | string | – | – |
| output_dir | string | – | – |
| project_name | string | – | – |
| schedules | array | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
monte_carlo_p50_p80 ~626
Monte Carlo Schedule Risk Analysis — P10/P50/P80/P90 completion-date forecast for a Primavera P6 schedule. Implements an AACE-style quantitative SRA (the same math as CPP's browser Tool_11 Portfolio Risk Engine, scripted Python counterpart). For each iteration, every activity duration is sampled from the chosen distribution (Triangular, BetaPERT, Uniform, Lognormal, etc.) parameterized by % of baseline duration; CPM re-runs and the project finish date is recorded. After all iterations, P10/P50/P80/P90 completion dates and a sensitivity tornado (per-activity correlation to project finish) are reported. Use this tool when you need probabilistic completion forecasts or a tornado/sensitivity ranking. For the QRAMM-aligned five-level maturity badge (AACE 122R-22) on the result, pipe the response into ``qramm_maturity``. Args: xer_path: server-side path to the schedule XER. xer_content: full text of the schedule XER (alternative for hosted/remote use). Supply EXACTLY ONE of path/content. iterations: number of MC iterations (default 5000). distribution: 'Triangular', 'BetaPERT', 'Uniform', 'Lognormal' (case-insensitive — passed through). optimistic_pct, most_likely_pct, pessimistic_pct: % of baseline duration for the distribution params (defaults: 85 / 100 / 120). seed: optional fixed seed for reproducibility (0 = system entropy = non-reproducible). output_dir: optional output dir; tempdir if "". Returns: Full SRA result dict, key paths: - 'baseline.percentiles': lowercase p-keys {'p10','p25','p50','p75','p…
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| distribution | string | – | – |
| iterations | integer | – | – |
| most_likely_pct | number | – | – |
| optimistic_pct | number | – | – |
| output_dir | string | – | – |
| pessimistic_pct | number | – | – |
| seed | integer | – | – |
| xer_content | string | – | – |
| xer_path | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
path_explorer ~388
Logic-trace driver-chain explorer — answers "WHY is this activity critical?" and "WHAT does it drive?". Traces driving predecessors backward from a target activity to project start (the "why critical" chain) and/or driving successors forward to project finish (the "what it drives" chain). Detects constraint-driven artificial criticality and cites AACE RP 49R-06 when found. Supports multiple parallel critical paths (MCPM) and near-critical paths. Use this tool when investigating a single activity's logic chain. For a project-wide CP / logic health audit, use ``critical_path_validator``. Args: xer_path: server-side path to the schedule XER. xer_content: full text of the schedule XER (alternative for hosted/remote use). Supply EXACTLY ONE of path/content. target_activity_codes: list of task_codes to trace; if empty, all CP / near-critical endpoints are traced. direction: 'backward' (predecessors), 'forward' (successors), or 'both' (default). include_near_critical: also trace near-critical endpoints (within float band). output_dir: optional dir for HTML / CSV / JSON outputs. Returns: { "paths": [{chain dicts ...}], "output_files": {dashboard, csv, json}, "project_finish": "YYYY-MM-DD", "project_name": ..., "data_date": ... }
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| direction | string | – | – |
| include_near_critical | boolean | – | – |
| output_dir | string | – | – |
| target_activity_codes | array | – | – |
| xer_content | string | – | – |
| xer_path | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
qramm_maturity ~597
QRAMM-aligned maturity reading for an SRA result. Places a Schedule Risk Analysis run (from ``monte_carlo_p50_p80`` or any equivalent dict) on the five named maturity levels of AACE RP 122R-22 (Quantitative Risk Analysis Maturity Model), section 3: level 1 Reactive, level 2 Ad-hoc, level 3 Centralized, level 4 Dynamic, level 5 Adaptive. Inputs the SRA inspects (defensively, all keys optional): - baseline.percentiles (lowercase p50 / p80 presence) - baseline.config (iterations, opt/ml/pes %, distribution) - baseline.sensitivity (per-activity tornado rows, on_cp) - mitigated (scenario comparison evidence) - risk_register_simulation + risk_register_used (Hulett quantified risk register evidence) - convergence (MC diagnostics, required for level 5) Use this tool any time you have an SRA result and want a maturity reading for a forensic-claim methodology section. Note the scope limit the badge carries on every render: AACE 122R-22 assesses the quantitative-risk capability of an ORGANIZATION and states it is guidelines rather than a standard, so a reading on one simulation run is CPP's placement on the RP's scale, not a QRAMM score. Report it as "QRAMM-aligned", never as "per AACE 122R-22". Args: sra_result: dict from ``monte_carlo_p50_p80``. May be {} - the badge degrades to level 1 with the missing evidence listed. Returns: { "rp_citation": "AACE RP 122R-22 ...", "scale_max": 5, "scale_note": "... names five levels ...", "level": int (1-5), "level_name":…
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| sra_result | object | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
slip_velocity ~1,089
Per-window slip velocity & acceleration trend across XER snapshots. Computes three signed metrics per window from the underlying forensic windows analysis: - slip_velocity_days_per_day: completion shift / window duration (positive = slipping, negative = recovering). Numerator is the WORKING-day completion shift. The denominator is WORKING days between the prior and later data dates on the same calendar (``window_duration_workdays``), making this a same-day-type working-day/working-day rate. It falls back to CALENDAR days only for legacy window dicts that predate that field, and such a row is flagged ``velocity_basis="wd/cd"``. Read ``velocity_basis`` to know which denominator produced the figure. Each velocity field name states the ratio it holds: ``slip_velocity_workdays_per_workday`` (populated only on the wd/wd path), ``slip_velocity_workdays_per_calendar_day`` (working-days of slip per CALENDAR day elapsed, computed against ``window_duration_days``), and ``slip_velocity_days_per_day`` as the retained back-compat name for whichever basis was selected. Quote ``basis`` in any expert report. NOTE (2026-09-03): the two named fields are no longer equal. ``slip_velocity_workdays_per_calendar_day`` used to be a blind copy of the headline velocity, which made its name wrong once the denominator moved to working days — it read 5/10 = 0.500 while its name promised 5/14 = 0.357. It now holds the calendar-day rate it is named for. - slip_acceleration: velocity[n] - velocity[n-1] (positive = slip rate increasing, negative = dece…
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| schedules | array | – | – |
| xer_contents | array | – | – |
| xer_paths | array | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
time_impact_analysis_fragnet ~964
Time Impact Analysis (TIA) — prospective fragnet insertion into a pre-impact baseline schedule. Supports two modes. **Single-base mode** (legacy): supply ``baseline_xer_path`` or ``baseline_xer_content``. All fragnets are inserted into the same shared baseline XER and impact is measured against that shared baseline. The result carries a ``single_base_disclosure`` warning explaining this is an AACE 29R-03 §3.7 simplification — acceptable when all events share a single baseline window, but not strict MIP 3.7 Multiple Base. **Multi-base mode** (AACE 29R-03 MIP 3.7 Multiple Base): supply ``per_event_bases`` — a dict keyed by each fragnet's ``id``, with each value a dict containing EITHER ``xer_path`` OR ``xer_content`` for that event's pre-event contemporaneous baseline. Each fragnet is inserted into its OWN base, impact is measured against THAT base's pre-event finish, and the result carries ``per_event_methodology``, ``per_event_base_count``, and ``per_event_bases_used`` (sha256-truncated content hashes for audit reproducibility). The cumulative-impact figure carries ``cumulative_caveat`` because the sum of events measured against different bases is NOT a valid joint impact. Exactly ONE of {baseline_xer_path, baseline_xer_content, per_event_bases} must be supplied. Multi-base mode errors out (returning ``{"error": ...}``) if any fragnet id is missing from ``per_event_bases``. Use this tool when modeling delay impact prospectively (e.g. quantifying RFI / change-order delay before settlement). For retrospective windows analysis after the fact, use ``forensic_windows_analysis`` (MIP 3.3 windows). Args:…
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| baseline_xer_content | string | – | – |
| baseline_xer_path | string | – | – |
| fragnets | array | – | – |
| output_dir | string | – | – |
| per_event_bases | object | – | – |
| project_name | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
woet_classifier ~607
Worked-vs-On-time Execution Timeline (WOET) per-activity day-by-day classification of as-built execution against baseline. For each pairable activity (matched by ``task_code``), classifies execution into 4 day-states: - PROGRESS: work performed during the baseline-planned window - GAIN: work performed BEFORE the baseline window opened - EXTENDED: work performed AFTER the baseline window closed - VOID: baseline-window day where activity was NOT active This is a CPP-disclosed enhancement layered on top of AACE 29R-03 §3.3 Windows Analysis — a per-day execution classifier (Progress/Gain/Extended/Void) NOT itself AACE-defined. It is not a substitute for fragnet-based AACE 29R-03 §3.7 (TIA) modeling. It gives the trier-of-fact a calendar picture of how the project executed versus how it was supposed to execute, which is otherwise buried in finish-date deltas. Use this tool when you want a per-activity execution-quality picture (on-time %, count of activities with VOID days, etc.). Args: baseline_xer_path: server-side path to baseline XER (target dates). actual_xer_path: server-side path to as-built XER (act dates). baseline_xer_content: full text of baseline XER (alternative). actual_xer_content: full text of as-built XER (alternative). Supply EXACTLY ONE of path/content per pair. today: optional ISO date (YYYY-MM-DD) reference for in-progress activities. Defaults to actual XER's last_recalc_date if available, else today's date. Returns: { "method": "WOET", "standard": "AACE 29R-03 §3.3 Windows Analysis — per-day execution class…
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| actual_xer_content | string | – | – |
| actual_xer_path | string | – | – |
| baseline_xer_content | string | – | – |
| baseline_xer_path | string | – | – |
| today | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
xer_parser ~361
Parse a Primavera P6 XER file and return a TABLE SUMMARY (not the full row-level data — XER row dumps explode the MCP context window). For each table in the XER, returns the table name, field list, and record count. Per-row data is intentionally omitted — for forensic / DCMA / windows analysis use the dedicated tools (``forensic_windows_analysis``, ``critical_path_validator``, etc.) which consume the parsed XER internally and return analytical summaries, not raw rows. Use this tool to confirm an XER is parseable, list its tables, see the data date / project name from PROJECT, or count activities in TASK before deciding which deeper tool to run. Args: xer_path: server-side filesystem path to the XER file. xer_content: full text of the XER file (alternative for hosted/remote use). Supply EXACTLY ONE of path/content. Returns: { "filepath": absolute path, "encoding_used": "utf-8" | "cp1252" | ..., "ermhdr": file header dict (P6 version, export user, etc.), "tables": [{"name", "fields", "record_count"}, ...], "table_count": int, "total_records": int, "project_summary": { "proj_id", "proj_short_name", "proj_long_name", "data_date", "plan_end_date" } (from first PROJECT row, if any) }
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| xer_content | string | – | – |
| xer_path | string | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the io.github.danafitkowski/cpp-cpm-engine MCP server?
io.github.danafitkowski/cpp-cpm-engine is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.danafitkowski/cpp-cpm-engine. Forensic scheduling MCP for Primavera P6 (XER): AACE windows, DCMA-14, Monte Carlo, TIA. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.criticalpathpartners.ca/mcp).
Is the io.github.danafitkowski/cpp-cpm-engine MCP server safe to use?
io.github.danafitkowski/cpp-cpm-engine scores 75 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.danafitkowski/cpp-cpm-engine MCP server expose?
io.github.danafitkowski/cpp-cpm-engine exposes 13 tools: forensic_windows_analysis, concurrent_delay_matrix, woet_classifier, slip_velocity, collapsed_as_built, and 8 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 10,614 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the io.github.danafitkowski/cpp-cpm-engine MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to io.github.danafitkowski/cpp-cpm-engine without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the io.github.danafitkowski/cpp-cpm-engine MCP server still maintained?
io.github.danafitkowski/cpp-cpm-engine is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.